Literature DB >> 1797040

Comparison between three rapid methods for direct diagnosis of influenza and the conventional isolation procedure.

J J Chomel1, D Pardon, D Thouvenot, J P Allard, M Aymard.   

Abstract

Besides the rapid diagnostic tests based on influenza A and B antigens nucleoproteins detection, which are routinely used, the isolation of influenza strains is still required to obtain recent variant isolates for full antigenic characterization, in order to up-date the influenza vaccine composition. To increase the rapidity and the efficacy of the virus growth, we implemented a culture test in 24-well plates by centrifugation of samples on to LLCMK2 cells in the presence of trypsin. This test was routinely applied to 331 nasopharyngeal swabs collected during the influenza A outbreak in the winters 1988-1989 and to 962 in 1989-1990. The centrifugation culture assay has been compared with the direct detection of NP antigens in the clinical samples by immunofluorescence and capture ELISA tests and with the conventional virus isolation by inoculation of the samples to embryonated eggs and to LLCMK2 cell cultures. Compared with the NP antigen detection tests, the centrifugation culture assay closely correlated (r = 0.95) and the sensitivity and specificity were also excellent, 93.4% and 99.6%, respectively. Compared with the conventional culture assays, the centrifugation culture markedly increased the performance (five times) and rapidity (2 days) of influenza virus isolation and identification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1797040     DOI: 10.1016/s1045-1056(05)80017-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biologicals        ISSN: 1045-1056            Impact factor:   1.856


  7 in total

1.  Survey on influenza laboratory diagnostic and surveillance methods in Europe. European Scientific Working Group on Influenza.

Authors:  C Hannoun; B Tumova
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  Identification of pandemic viral strains. Role of the national reference centre.

Authors:  M Aymard
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Comparison of the MChip to viral culture, reverse transcription-PCR, and the QuickVue influenza A+B test for rapid diagnosis of influenza.

Authors:  Martin Mehlmann; Aleta B Bonner; John V Williams; Daniela M Dankbar; Chad L Moore; Robert D Kuchta; Amy B Podsiad; John D Tamerius; Erica D Dawson; Kathy L Rowlen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Surveillance of community-acquired viral infections due to respiratory viruses in Rhone-Alpes (France) during winter 1994 to 1995.

Authors:  B Lina; M Valette; S Foray; J Luciani; J Stagnara; D M See; M Aymard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of rapid detection methods for influenza A virus and their value in health-care management of institutionalized geriatric patients.

Authors:  G P Leonardi; H Leib; G S Birkhead; C Smith; P Costello; W Conron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Prospective application of reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction for diagnosing influenza infections in respiratory samples from a children's hospital.

Authors:  E C Claas; A J van Milaan; M J Sprenger; M Ruiten-Stuiver; G I Arron; P H Rothbarth; N Masurel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Epidemiology of viral infections and evaluation of the potential benefit of OM-85 BV on the virologic status of children attending day-care centers.

Authors:  M Aymard; J J Chomel; J P Allard; D Thouvenot; D Honegger; D Floret; J P Boissel; J P Collet; F Dürr; J Gillet
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.580

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.