Literature DB >> 17970358

Children's participation in vaccine research: parents' views.

Fabienne Jay1, Tracey Chantler, Amanda Lees, Andrew J Pollard.   

Abstract

AIM: Vaccine studies that evaluate the persistence of protection following immunisation require subjects to continue participation in a research protocol over many years. As parents' attitudes and opinions may change over time, and with experience of research, it is important to consider the factors influencing parents' decision-making about their child's continued participation in such prolonged vaccine studies.
METHOD: Parental views about participation of their child in a one-year follow-up vaccine study were explored by means of a self-administered questionnaire. Of the 254 eligible parents, 187 took part (74 per cent).
RESULTS: Parents who provided consent were more likely to agree that having a home visit to take blood was very helpful (p=0.005) and that information obtained during the earlier part of the study influenced their decision to take part in a follow-up study (p<0.0001). Parents who did not consent to their child's participation were more likely to report the presence of personal reasons as a variable influencing their decision (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between study staff and parents is the cornerstone for success in performing studies involving vaccines and children. Provision of clear study information (oral and written) and offering the convenience of home visits are important in retaining participants in paediatric vaccine trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17970358     DOI: 10.7748/paed2007.10.19.8.14.c4460

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Paediatr Nurs        ISSN: 0962-9513


  3 in total

1.  Factors associated with parents' willingness to enroll their children in trials for COVID-19 vaccination.

Authors:  Ran D Goldman; Georg Staubli; Cristina Parra Cotanda; Julie C Brown; Julia Hoeffe; Michelle Seiler; Renana Gelernter; Jeanine E Hall; Mark A Griffiths; Adrienne L Davis; Sergio Manzano; Ahmed Mater; Sara Ahmed; David Sheridan; Matt Hansen; Samina Ali; Graham C Thompson; Naoki Shimizu; Eileen J Klein
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Minimally-invasive methods for examining biological changes in response to chronic stress: A scoping review.

Authors:  Rebecca E Salomon; Kelly R Tan; Ashley Vaughan; Harry Adynski; Keely A Muscatell
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 5.837

Review 3.  Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised trials.

Authors:  Shaun Treweek; Marie Pitkethly; Jonathan Cook; Cynthia Fraser; Elizabeth Mitchell; Frank Sullivan; Catherine Jackson; Tyna K Taskila; Heidi Gardner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-02-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.