Literature DB >> 17970145

A comparison of outcomes following tympanostomy tube placement or conservative measures for management of otitis media with effusion.

Svetlana Diacova1, Thomas J McDonald.   

Abstract

We obtained the charts of 183 patients (197 ears) who had undergone surgery for chronic otitis media (COM), and we reviewed their otic histories to analyze the series of events that ultimately culminated in surgery. All ears had originally been treated for otitis media with effusion (OME); 125 ears had been treated with tympanostomy tube placement, and 72 ears had been treated with conservative measures. Our goal was to compare the influence that these two strategies had on the subsequent development of COM and its sequelae (i.e., retraction pockets, tympanic membrane perforations, and cholesteatomas) and thereby determine which strategy is preferable. We found that although retraction pockets developed in a significantly higher proportion of the tympanostomy-treated ears than the conservatively treated ears (58 vs. 35%; p < 0.01), a significantly greater percentage of retractions in the tympanostomy-treated ears were mild and situated in the anterior part of the tympanic membrane (52 vs. 32%; p < 0.05). Moreover, severe retractions were significantly more common in the conservatively treated ears (40 vs. 16%; p < 0.02); the incidence of complete retractions in the two groups of ears was similar (tympanostomy: 32%; conservative treatment: 28%). Cholesteatomas developed in a significantly lower percentage of tympanostomy-treated ears (67 vs. 81%; p < 0.05), and the incidence of large cholesteatomas that involved the tympanic and mastoid cavities was likewise significantly lower in these ears (44 vs. 69%; p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of tympanic membrane perforations. Finally, even though all of these ears eventually required surgery for COM, the tympanostomy-treated ears required significantly fewer repeat surgeries (16 vs. 28%; p < 0.05) and significantly fewer radical modified tympanomastoidectomies (30 vs. 44%; p < 0.05). Therefore, we conclude that myringotomy with insertion of tympanostomy tubes to treat OME is superior to conservative treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17970145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Nose Throat J        ISSN: 0145-5613            Impact factor:   1.697


  3 in total

1.  A Novel Surgery Classification for Endoscopic Approaches to Middle Ear Cholesteatoma.

Authors:  Yu Sun; En-Hao Wang; Jin-Tao Yu; Gang Zhong; Li-Xin Zhu; Yi Wang; Niu Xun; Hong Yu; Wen Zhou; Zhen Xie; Kun Zhang; Guo-Run Fan; Yi Zhong; Hong-Jun Xiao; Wei-Jia Kong
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2020-03-13

2.  Shepard grommet tympanostomy tube complications in children with chronic otitis media with effusion.

Authors:  Huseyin Yaman; Suleyman Yilmaz; Nihal Alkan; Bugra Subasi; Ender Guclu; Ozcan Ozturk
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Diseases of the middle ear in childhood.

Authors:  Amir Minovi; Stefan Dazert
Journal:  GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-12-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.