INTRODUCTION: Spirometry is more frequently measured in younger children. Our primary aim was to validate 2005 ATS-ERS Task Force standards for spirometry in adults and older children among a population of 5-year-old children. Our secondary aim was to relate spirometry to asthma symptoms. METHODS: Children were participants in a longitudinal cohort study where asthma symptoms and spirometry were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 827 children assessed, spirometry was obtained in 638 (85 with wheeze). A back-extrapolated volume/FVC ratio of <5% was achieved in 99% of children, the best two FVC were < or =150 ml of each other in 89% and three efforts were obtained within six attempts in 88%. The best two FVC were within 10% of each other in 82% of children. Only 13% achieved a forced expiratory time (FET) of > or =3 sec, whereas 80% had an FET of > or =1 sec. All criteria (including FET > or =1 s and FVC < or =10%) were met in 400 (65%) of the 638 children. Most spirometric indices were reduced in association with current wheeze and a history of asthma; children with current wheeze had a mean reduction of 0.65 FEV(1) z score compared to healthy children, P < 0.001. An FEV(1) z score of -1.0 had 82% sensitivity but only 50% specificity for current wheeze, the corresponding numbers for an FEF(50) z score of -1.0 being 79% and 71%. CONCLUSIONS: The standards for spirometry are mostly achieved in this age group but are not necessarily valid and require revision. Reliable spirometry is feasible in 5-year-old children where reduced measurements are associated with asthma symptoms and in whom FEF(50) appears to be the most discriminatory variable.
INTRODUCTION: Spirometry is more frequently measured in younger children. Our primary aim was to validate 2005 ATS-ERS Task Force standards for spirometry in adults and older children among a population of 5-year-old children. Our secondary aim was to relate spirometry to asthma symptoms. METHODS:Children were participants in a longitudinal cohort study where asthma symptoms and spirometry were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 827 children assessed, spirometry was obtained in 638 (85 with wheeze). A back-extrapolated volume/FVC ratio of <5% was achieved in 99% of children, the best two FVC were < or =150 ml of each other in 89% and three efforts were obtained within six attempts in 88%. The best two FVC were within 10% of each other in 82% of children. Only 13% achieved a forced expiratory time (FET) of > or =3 sec, whereas 80% had an FET of > or =1 sec. All criteria (including FET > or =1 s and FVC < or =10%) were met in 400 (65%) of the 638 children. Most spirometric indices were reduced in association with current wheeze and a history of asthma; children with current wheeze had a mean reduction of 0.65 FEV(1) z score compared to healthy children, P < 0.001. An FEV(1) z score of -1.0 had 82% sensitivity but only 50% specificity for current wheeze, the corresponding numbers for an FEF(50) z score of -1.0 being 79% and 71%. CONCLUSIONS: The standards for spirometry are mostly achieved in this age group but are not necessarily valid and require revision. Reliable spirometry is feasible in 5-year-old children where reduced measurements are associated with asthma symptoms and in whom FEF(50) appears to be the most discriminatory variable.
Authors: Stephen W Turner; Jon G Ayres; Tatiana V Macfarlane; Anil Mehta; Gita Mehta; Colin N Palmer; Steve Cunningham; Tim Adams; Krishnan Aniruddhan; Claire Bell; Donna Corrigan; Jason Cunningham; Andrew Duncan; Gerard Hunt; Richard Leece; Una MacFadyen; Jonathan McCormick; Sally McLeish; Andrew Mitra; Deborah Miller; Elizabeth Waxman; Alan Webb; Slawomir Wojcik; Somnath Mukhopadhyay; Donald Macgregor Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 4.615