Literature DB >> 17968741

Future directions for drug transporter modelling.

S Ekins1, G F Ecker, P Chiba, P W Swaan.   

Abstract

Since the late 1980s computational methods such as quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) and pharmacophore approaches have become more widely applied to assess interactions between drug-like molecules and transporters, starting with P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Identifying molecules that interact with P-gp and other transporters is important for drug discovery, but it is normally ascertained using laborious in vitro and in vivo studies. Computational QSAR and pharmacophore models can be used to screen commercial databases of molecules rapidly and suggest those likely to bind as substrates or inhibitors for transporters. These predictions can then be readily verified in vitro, thus representing a more efficient route to screening. Recently, the application of this approach has seen the identification of new substrates and inhibitors for several transporters. The successful application of computational models and pharmacophore models in particular to predict transporter binding accurately represents a way to anticipate drug-drug interactions of novel molecules from molecular structure. These models may also see incorporation in future pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models to improve predictions of in vivo drug effects in patients. The implications of early assessment of transporter activity, current advances in QSAR, and other computational methods for future development of these and systems-based approaches will be discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17968741     DOI: 10.1080/00498250701646341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenobiotica        ISSN: 0049-8254            Impact factor:   1.908


  14 in total

1.  Exploring the P-glycoprotein binding cavity with polyoxyethylene alkyl ethers.

Authors:  Xiaochun Li-Blatter; Anna Seelig
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Membrane transporters in drug development.

Authors:  Kathleen M Giacomini; Shiew-Mei Huang; Donald J Tweedie; Leslie Z Benet; Kim L R Brouwer; Xiaoyan Chu; Amber Dahlin; Raymond Evers; Volker Fischer; Kathleen M Hillgren; Keith A Hoffmaster; Toshihisa Ishikawa; Dietrich Keppler; Richard B Kim; Caroline A Lee; Mikko Niemi; Joseph W Polli; Yuichi Sugiyama; Peter W Swaan; Joseph A Ware; Stephen H Wright; Sook Wah Yee; Maciej J Zamek-Gliszczynski; Lei Zhang
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Computational ligand-based rational design: Role of conformational sampling and force fields in model development.

Authors:  Jihyun Shim; Alexander D Mackerell
Journal:  Medchemcomm       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.597

Review 4.  The Next Era: Deep Learning in Pharmaceutical Research.

Authors:  Sean Ekins
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Computational modeling to accelerate the identification of substrates and inhibitors for transporters that affect drug disposition.

Authors:  S Ekins; J E Polli; P W Swaan; S H Wright
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  A substrate pharmacophore for the human organic cation/carnitine transporter identifies compounds associated with rhabdomyolysis.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Lei Diao; James E Polli
Journal:  Mol Pharm       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 7.  Determination and modelling of stereoselective interactions of ligands with drug transporters: a key dimension in the understanding of drug disposition.

Authors:  P Bhatia; M Kolinski; R Moaddel; K Jozwiak; I W Wainer
Journal:  Xenobiotica       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.908

8.  Effect of the drug transporters ABCG2, Abcg2, ABCB1 and ABCC2 on the disposition, brain accumulation and myelotoxicity of the aurora kinase B inhibitor barasertib and its more active form barasertib-hydroxy-QPA.

Authors:  Serena Marchetti; Dick Pluim; Monique van Eijndhoven; Olaf van Tellingen; Roberto Mazzanti; Jos H Beijnen; Jan H M Schellens
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2013-01-13       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 9.  Molecular characterization of CYP2B6 substrates.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Manisha Iyer; Matthew D Krasowski; Evan D Kharasch
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.731

10.  Fluorescent probes of the isoxazole-dihydropyridine scaffold: MDR-1 binding and homology model.

Authors:  Monika I Szabon-Watola; Sarah V Ulatowski; Kathleen M George; Christina D Hayes; Scott A Steiger; Nicholas R Natale
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.823

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.