Literature DB >> 17968337

Primer: challenges in randomized and observational studies.

Robert Landewé1, Désirée van der Heijde.   

Abstract

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered superior to observational studies, and both clinicians and researchers believe that conclusions that stem from observational research are flawed. RCTs, however, have important methodological and interpretational limitations, and particular clinical questions can only be addressed by observational research. This Review compares RCTs and observational studies with regard to particular limitations, and explains how the credibility of results from observational studies can be improved by making use of advanced analytical techniques.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17968337     DOI: 10.1038/ncprheum0626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol        ISSN: 1745-8382


  7 in total

1.  The value of observational cohort studies for cancer drugs.

Authors:  David R Spigel
Journal:  Biotechnol Healthc       Date:  2010

2.  Not-in-trial simulation I: Bridging cardiovascular risk from clinical trials to real-life conditions.

Authors:  Anne S Y Chain; Jeanne P Dieleman; Charlotte van Noord; Albert Hofman; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Meindert Danhof; Miriam C J M Sturkenboom; Oscar Della Pasqua
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.335

3.  A comparison of outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty and fusion in everyday clinical practice: surgical and methodological aspects.

Authors:  Dieter Grob; Francois Porchet; Frank S Kleinstück; Friederike Lattig; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Andrea Luca; Urs Mutter; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Physical Activity Measurement Methodologies: A Systematic Review in the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN).

Authors:  Yi-Shin Lee; John Komar; Michael Yong Hwa Chia
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20

Review 5.  Microdiscectomy compared with standard discectomy: an old problem revisited with new outcome measures within the framework of a spine surgical registry.

Authors:  F Porchet; V Bartanusz; F S Kleinstueck; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; D Grob; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Microdiscectomy or tubular discectomy: Is any of them a better option for management of lumbar disc prolapse.

Authors:  Pallav S Bhatia; Harvinder S Chhabra; Bibhudendu Mohapatra; Ankur Nanda; Gururaj Sangodimath; Rahul Kaul
Journal:  J Craniovertebr Junction Spine       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

7.  Undifferentiated arthritis: a changing population who did not benefit from enhanced disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug strategies-results from a 25 year longitudinal inception cohort.

Authors:  Marloes Verstappen; Xanthe M E Matthijssen; Annette H M van der Helm-van Mil
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 7.046

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.