| Literature DB >> 17968337 |
Robert Landewé1, Désirée van der Heijde.
Abstract
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered superior to observational studies, and both clinicians and researchers believe that conclusions that stem from observational research are flawed. RCTs, however, have important methodological and interpretational limitations, and particular clinical questions can only be addressed by observational research. This Review compares RCTs and observational studies with regard to particular limitations, and explains how the credibility of results from observational studies can be improved by making use of advanced analytical techniques.Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17968337 DOI: 10.1038/ncprheum0626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol ISSN: 1745-8382