Literature DB >> 1796791

Minimal head injury: is admission necessary?

D H Livingston1, P A Loder, C D Hunt.   

Abstract

The records of 138 patients admitted a Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) of 14 or 15 following head injury were reviewed to assess the need for hospital observation and to determine whether obtaining a normal computerized tomography (CT) scan in the emergency department could have avoided admission. GCS was 15 in 103 patients (74%) and 14 in 35 (26%). Eighty-three patients were admitted for their head injury alone, and 55 had other injuries but would have required admission for their head injury. Loss of consciousness was documented in 51 per cent and suspected in another 29 per cent and was distributed equally regardless of GCS. Seven per cent (5/71) of skull x rays were positive and were associated with CNS pathology in three patients. Skull x rays in an additional four patients with positive CT findings were negative including a patient with an epidural hematoma (EDH). Seventeen per cent (13/75) of CT scans were positive (contusions 5, subdural hematoma 3, subarachnoid hemorrhage 2, edema 2, EDH 1). Only the patient with the EDH required operative treatment. No patient with a normal CT scan went on to develop any neurosurgical problems, and 78 per cent of the patients admitted with isolated head injuries were discharged within 48 hours. Significant CNS pathology does occur following "minimal" head injuries. Skull x rays are not helpful. The use of CT scanning appears to triage those patients requiring admission and in hospital observation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1796791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  9 in total

1.  Computerised tomography and acute traumatic head injury: time for change?

Authors:  J Cranshaw; G Hughes; M Clancy
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1996-03

Review 2.  Head trauma.

Authors:  Patricia C Davis
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Head injury--abuse or accident?

Authors:  B Wilkins
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Relative risk of deterioration after mild closed head injury.

Authors:  S T Lee; T N Liu; C W Wong; Y S Yeh; W C Tzaan
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 5.  Mild head injury: reliability of early computed tomographic findings in triage for admission.

Authors:  J-L af Geijerstam; M Britton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 6.  Traumatic alterations in consciousness: traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Brian J Blyth; Jeffrey J Bazarian
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 2.264

7.  Value of radiological diagnosis of skull fracture in the management of mild head injury: meta-analysis.

Authors:  P A Hofman; P Nelemans; G J Kemerink; J T Wilmink
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  A more detailed classification of mild head injury in adults and treatment guidelines.

Authors:  Young Bae Lee; Sun Ju Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-11-30

9.  Evaluation of the Scandinavian guidelines for head injuries based on a consecutive series with computed tomography from a Norwegian university hospital.

Authors:  Ingrid Haavde Strand; Ole Solheim; Kent Gøran Moen; Anne Vik
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 2.953

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.