Literature DB >> 17967602

The role of fibrates in the prevention of cardiovascular disease--a pooled meta-analysis of long-term randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Sandeep Ajoy Saha1, Lenney G Kizhakepunnur, Amol Bahekar, Rohit R Arora.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fibrates are effective antilipidemic agents with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonist activity, but clinical trial data on their role in cardiovascular prevention are conflicting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to evaluate their role in prevention of cardiovascular events.
METHODS: A total of 36,489 patients from 10 published randomized placebo-controlled trials were analyzed using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effects model. Odds ratios were computed for cardiovascular outcomes from data pooled from the selected trials, and statistical significance was tested using the z-test statistic (2-sided alpha error <.05).
RESULTS: Fibrates significantly reduced plasma total cholesterol and triglyceride levels by about 8% and 30%, respectively, and raised high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by about 9% compared with placebo. The odds of all-cause mortality tended to be higher (P = .08), and the odds of noncardiovascular mortality were significantly higher (P = .004) with the use of fibrates. However, these significant differences did not persist after exclusion of trials using clofibrate as the study drug. Fibrates did not significantly reduce the odds of cardiovascular mortality (P = .68), fatal myocardial infarction (MI) (P = .76), or stroke (P = .56). On the other hand, fibrates significantly reduced the odds of nonfatal MI by about 22% (P < .00001). The odds of developing cancer were not significantly higher with the use of fibrates (P = .98), nor were the odds of cancer-related death (P = .17).
CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our meta-analysis revealed that the long-term use of fibrates significantly reduces the occurrence of nonfatal MI but has no significant effect on other adverse cardiovascular outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17967602     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  20 in total

Review 1.  The HDL hypothesis: does high-density lipoprotein protect from atherosclerosis?

Authors:  Menno Vergeer; Adriaan G Holleboom; John J P Kastelein; Jan Albert Kuivenhoven
Journal:  J Lipid Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 5.922

Review 2.  Cardiovascular disease risk reduction by raising HDL cholesterol--current therapies and future opportunities.

Authors:  K Mahdy Ali; A Wonnerth; K Huber; J Wojta
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 8.739

3.  [Therapeutic drug option for dyslipaemia].

Authors:  Antonio Maiques Galan; Carlos Brotons Cuixart
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  Genetic Variants in HSD17B3, SMAD3, and IPO11 Impact Circulating Lipids in Response to Fenofibrate in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Daniel M Rotroff; Sonja S Pijut; Skylar W Marvel; John R Jack; Tammy M Havener; Aurora Pujol; Agatha Schluter; Gregory A Graf; Henry N Ginsberg; Hetal S Shah; He Gao; Mario-Luca Morieri; Alessandro Doria; Josyf C Mychaleckyi; Howard L McLeod; John B Buse; Michael J Wagner; Alison A Motsinger-Reif
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 5.  Do persons with diabetes benefit from combination statin and fibrate therapy?

Authors:  Paul D Rosenblit
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Lipid lowering therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Bernhard Föger
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2011-06

7.  Variation in the net benefit of aggressive cardiovascular risk factor control across the US population of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Rodney A Hayward; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2010-06-28

Review 8.  Potential increased risk of cancer from commonly used medications: an umbrella review of meta-analyses.

Authors:  J P A Ioannidis; Y Zhou; C Q Chang; S D Schully; M J Khoury; A N Freedman
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Diminishing efficacy of combination therapy, response-heterogeneity, and treatment intolerance limit the attainability of tight risk factor control in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Justin W Timbie; Rodney A Hayward; Sandeep Vijan
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 10.  Cholesteryl ester transfer protein: at the heart of the action of lipid-modulating therapy with statins, fibrates, niacin, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors.

Authors:  M John Chapman; Wilfried Le Goff; Maryse Guerin; Anatol Kontush
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-10-12       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.