Literature DB >> 17967313

Assessment of tumor response to the vascular disrupting agents 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid or combretastatin-A4-phosphate by intrinsic susceptibility magnetic resonance imaging.

Lesley D McPhail1, John R Griffiths, Simon P Robinson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the use of the transverse magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) relaxation rate R(2)(*) (s(-1)) as a biomarker of tumor vascular response to monitor vascular disrupting agent (VDA) therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Multigradient echo MRI was used to quantify R(2)(*) in rat GH3 prolactinomas. R(2)(*) is a sensitive index of deoxyhemoglobin in the blood and can therefore be used to give an index of tissue oxygenation. Tumor R(2)(*) was measured before and up to 35 min after treatment, and 24 h after treatment with either 350 mg/kg 5,6-dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA) or 100 mg/kg combretastatin-A4-phosphate (CA4P). After acquisition of the MRI data, functional tumor blood vessels remaining after VDA treatment were quantified using fluorescence microscopy of the perfusion marker Hoechst 33342.
RESULTS: DMXAA induced a transient, significant (p < 0.05) increase in tumor R(2)(*) 7 min after treatment, whereas CA4P induced no significant changes in tumor R(2)(*) over the first 35 min. Twenty-four hours after treatment, some DMXAA-treated tumors demonstrated a decrease in R(2)(*), but overall, reduction in R(2)(*) was not significant for this cohort. Tumors treated with CA4P showed a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in R(2)(*) 24 h after treatment. The degree of Hoechst 33342 uptake was associated with the degree of R(2)(*) reduction at 24 h for both agents.
CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in tumor R(2)(*) or deoxyhemoglobin levels 24 h after VDA treatment was a result of reduced blood volume caused by prolonged vascular collapse. Our results suggest that DMXAA was less effective than CA4P in this rat tumor model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17967313     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.08.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  4 in total

Review 1.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies.

Authors:  James P B O'Connor; Alan Jackson; Geoff J M Parker; Caleb Roberts; Gordon C Jayson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 66.675

2.  Multiparametric MRI biomarkers for measuring vascular disrupting effect on cancer.

Authors:  Huaijun Wang; Guy Marchal; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2011-01-28

3.  Monitoring antivascular therapy in head and neck cancer xenografts using contrast-enhanced MR and US imaging.

Authors:  Mukund Seshadri; Nuno T Sacadura; Tonya Coulthard
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 9.596

4.  A perspective on vascular disrupting agents that interact with tubulin: preclinical tumor imaging and biological assessment.

Authors:  Ralph P Mason; Dawen Zhao; Li Liu; Mary Lynn Trawick; Kevin G Pinney
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2011-02-14       Impact factor: 2.192

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.