| Literature DB >> 17967196 |
Michael H Parsons1, Christine M Rafferty, Byron B Lamont, Kenneth Dods, Meredith M Fairbanks.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is much debate concerning which ecological constraints are the most limiting factors to seedling recruitment in disturbed communities. We provide the first comparison between selective herbivory and plant competition effects among two post-mined forest ecosystems (primary succession) and one post-fire woodland ecosystem (secondary succession). Animal exclosure assessments of nine common species across eight sites were performed for comparison within three locations separated by up to 200 km. Additionally, we asked whether pre-browsed plants differed in nutrient content between or within species in the separate systems.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17967196 PMCID: PMC2200639 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6785-7-13
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Ecol ISSN: 1472-6785 Impact factor: 2.964
Table of attributes for 3 post-disturbance locations. Max/min temperature is monthly. 1 = western grey kangaroo, 2 = rabbit, 3 = western brush wallaby
| Ecosystem | Site | Location relative to Perth | Major species prior to disturbance | Landform | Soil type | Rainfall (mm) | Max/min temp (°C) | Type of disturbance | Primary herbivores |
| Banksia woodland | Whiteman Park | 18 km NE | Coastal dunes of quartz origin | Deep sands | 700 | 32.5/8 | Fire | 1,2,3 | |
| Moist jarrah forest | Huntly | 100 km S | Plateau of granite origin | Laterite over clay loam | 1200 | 28/5 | Bauxite mining | 1,2,3 | |
| Dry jarrah forest | Boddington | 180 km SE | Plateau of granite origin | Laterite over clay loam, | 800 | 30/5 | Bauxite mining | 1,3 |
Species in common at the 3 locations. * = grasslike as seedlings
| Species (family) |
| 1. |
| 2. |
| 3. |
| 4. |
| 5. |
| 6. |
| 7. |
| 8. |
| 9. |
Table of variables for the 9 common species in the 3 locations including levels of herbivory. N, P, K, and ADF: % dry weight, H2 O: % fresh weight, tannins: Merk tannic acid equivalents. Superscript refers to Estimated Marginal Means post-hoc analysis between sites with different letters significantly different at P < 0.05, 'a' refers to lowest value. YFEL = area of the youngest fully extended leaf
| Species | Pre fence removal height (cm) | Pre fence removal shoot mass (g) | Leaf area (mm2) YFEL | LMA (μg mm-2) | H2O | N | P | K | Tannins | ADF | Plants eaten (%) |
| 31.1 | 0.41 | 66 | 72 | 50.6 | 1.33a | 0.04a | 0.60a | 5.38a | 31.7a | 81 | |
| 48.6 | 1.97 | 45 | 104 | 37.7 | 1.63a | 0.03a | 0.47a | 8.35a | 28.1a | 42 | |
| 20.2 | 0.38 | 112 | 249 | 59.8 | 1.06b | 0.05a | 0.92a | 9.07a | 40.4a | 71 | |
| 11.2 | 0.04 | 101 | 167 | 55.8 | 1.37a | 0.04a | 0.74a | 2.30a | 38.2a | 100 | |
| 32.4 | 0.45 | 108 | 107 | 63.1 | 1.25a | 0.03a | 0.51a | 0.14a | 39.4a | 86 | |
| 43.6 | 0.36 | 85 | 162 | 33.1 | 0.78a | 0.03a | 0.41a | 0.44a | 39.5a | 100 | |
| 15.5 | 0.09 | 14 | 398 | 58.0 | 1.18a | 0.03a | 0.55a | 0.59a | 46.3a | 100 | |
| 10.7 | 0.04 | 105 | 143 | 58.1 | 1.00a | 0.08a | 0.70a | 1.79a | 37.9a | 98 | |
| 9.6 | 0.04 | 113 | 166 | 60.4 | 0.97a | 0.08b | 0.51a | 1.83a | 27.7a | 98 | |
| 42.8 | 1.97 | 450 | 188 | 52.2 | 1.90b | 0.10c | 1.00b | 4.32a | 38.3a | 99 | |
| 71.5 | 0.89 | 100 | 216 | 51.7 | 1.91b | 0.08b | 0.86b | 5.35a | 27.1a | 57 | |
| 39.3 | 0.81 | 68 | 390 | 58.2 | 1.03b | 0.04a | 0.99a | 8.27a | 40.6a | 99 | |
| 19.2 | 0.15 | 16.7 | 110 | 66.5 | 1.74b | 0.07b | 0.94a | 2.10a | 44.4a | 100 | |
| 40.1 | 0.59 | 116.7 | 157 | 67.1 | 1.55b | 0.07b | 0.91b | 0.25a | 32.9b | 93 | |
| 55.7 | 1.18 | 516.7 | 456 | 51.6 | 0.94a | 0.05b | 0.68b | 0.22a | 39.8a | 100 | |
| 19.0 | 0.29 | 200 | 300 | 70.5 | 1.47b | 0.06b | 1.62b | 0.56a | 39.7a | 100 | |
| 24.6 | 0.45 | 41.7 | 40 | 58.8 | 1.12a | 0.11b | 0.72a | 1.53a | 26.8b | 98 | |
| 43.9 | 0.26 | 29.2 | 114 | 62.3 | 0.87a | 0.06a | 0.60a | 1.84a | 23.3a | 99 | |
| 47.4 | 0.38 | 428.9 | 100 | 61.7 | 1.51a | 0.07b | 0.85b | 6.03a | 38.1a | 79 | |
| 68.5 | 0.44 | 65.8 | 85 | 55.6 | 1.57a | 0.05b | 0.83b | 5.83a | 32.2b | 76 | |
| 13.4 | 0.13 | 61.3 | 139 | 62.0 | 0.79a | 0.17b | 0.81a | 8.81a | 42.7a | 100 | |
| ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | |
| 35.6 | 0.35 | 164.5 | 87 | 72.4 | 1.68b | 0.11c | 1.00b | 0.38a | 31.0b | 84 | |
| 47.4 | 0.92 | 123.0 | 105 | 64.8 | 0.96a | 0.07b | 0.69b | 0.49a | 35.3a | 100 | |
| ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ---- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | ----- | |
| 9.5 | 0.05 | 206.4 | 72 | 67.6 | 0.93a | 0.13c | 0.61a | 1.39a | 33.8b | 95 | |
| 13.5 | 0.08 | 227.0 | 78 | 51.8 | 0.86a | 0.11b | 0.58a | 1.96a | 26.8a | 98 |
Within-species comparison: mean biomass with interactions for inside/out, low/high density for Whiteman (N = 3) and mines (N = 5) by 3-way ANOVA (site × density × exclosure), exclosure one-tailed, competition and interactions two-tailed
| Location | Exclosure | Density | Loc χ Excl | Loc χ Dens | Excl χ Dens | Loc χ Excl χ Dens | |
| 0.155 | 0.346 | 0.378 | 0.862 | 0.832 | 0.490 | ||
| 0.062 | 0.111 | 0.180 | 0.276 | 0.332 | 0.604 | ||
| 0.093 | 0.883 | 0.072 | 0.751 | 0.876 | 0.526 | ||
| 0.242 | 0.038 | 0.140 | 0.773 | 0.964 | |||
| 0.678 | 0.783 | 0.482 | 0.801 | 0.551 | |||
| 0.911 | 0.335 | 0.123 | 0.126 | 0.922 | |||
| 0.203 | 0.613 | 0.994 | 0.639 | 0.479 | 0.791 | ||
| 0.348 | 0.051 | 0.178 | 0.972 | 0.646 | |||
| 0.477 | 0.035 | 0.794 | 0.566 | 0.768 |
Post-fire vs Post-mine analysis (3-way ANOVA) for location × exclosure × density with all interactions.P values are bold where significant. * = not planted at BBM. # = site effect, & = density × exclosure effect. P values are bold where significant
| Biomass (g) | ||||||
| Exclosure | Density | |||||
| Species | Inside | Out | Low | High | ||
| 6.06 | 0.248 | 3.83 | 2.47 | 0.883 | ||
| 28.5 | 11.07 | 0.201 | 19.3 | 20.3 | 0.205 | |
| 3.23 | 0.500 | 1.77 | 1.97 | 0.729 | ||
| 0.14 | 0.001 | 0.83 | 0.53 | |||
| 40.2 | 3.700 | 22.4 | 18.1 | 0.816 | ||
| 2.70 | 0.001 | 0.70 | 2.05 | 0.117 | ||
| 1.33 | 0.001 | 0.55 | 0.75 | 0.617 | ||
| 0.01 | 0.001 | 0.270 | 0.006 | 0.001 | 0.388 | |
| 0.02 | 0.002 | 0.103 | 0.003 | 0.016 | 0.306 | |
| 21.5 | 17.6 | 0.062 | 11.6 | 27.5 | 0.344 | |
| 110.0 | 84.4 | 0.135 | 119.9 | 74.5 | 0.242 | |
| 4.48 | 1.49 | 3.56 | 2.81 | 0.463 | ||
| 0.42 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.277 | ||
| 19.6 | 2.17 | 5.93 | 15.9 | 0.443 | ||
| 14.1 | 0.18 | 7.56 | 6.10 | 0.909 | ||
| 1.45 | 0.07 | 1.12 | 0.40 | 0.277 | ||
| 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.06 | 0.03 | 0.060 | ||
| 0.12 | 0.01 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.694 | ||
Figure 1Macropod raw scat counts at 3 locations, 2002. First count taken after establishment, final counts taken before harvest. Solid fill represents January-February count, diagonal fill is August-September. Letters refer to Scheffé post-hoc test. Rabbit scats were rare.
Chemical analysis for each species by location. Plants harvested and analysed for nitrogen (N), protein, phosphorus (P), Potassium (K), acid digest fibre (ADF) and total tannins (TT). N, protein, P and K are given in % dry matter, ADF as % and TT as % equivalent to tannic acid. Means followed by different letters are significantly different at the 95% confidence level, SE in parenthesis. Superscript refers to Estimated Marginal Means post-hoc analysis within sites with different letters significantly different at P < 0.05; ('a' refers to largest value, 'b' is smaller etc.)
| N | P | K | ADF | Tannins | |
| %db | %db | %db | % | % | |
| 1.5 (0.19)ab | 0.05 (0.01)b | 0.6 (0.26)bc | 40.1 (3.35)b | 5.8 (1.15)b | |
| 1.6 (0.41)a | 0.03 (0.01)b | 0.5 (0.12)c | 28.1 (9.92)c | 8.3 (0.91)a | |
| 1.1 (0.21)c | 0.05 (0.02)b | 0.9 (0.16)a | 40.4 (1.17)b | 9.1 (0.52)a | |
| 1.4 (0.09)b | 0.04 (0.01)b | 0.7 (0.11)b | 38.2 (1.91)c | 2.3 (0.26)c | |
| 1.3 (0.10)b | 0.03 (0.01)b | 0.5 (0.11)c | 39.4 (1.63)c | 0.1 (0.08)e | |
| 0.8 (0.11)d | 0.03 (0.01)b | 0.4 (0.09)c | 39.5 (0.57)b | 0.4 (0.36)d | |
| 1.2 (0.16)bc | 0.03 (0.01)b | 0.6 (0.20)c | 46.3 (1.55)a | 0.6 (0.31)d | |
| 1.0c | 0.07b | 0.7b | 37.9b | 1.8c | |
| 1.0 (0.14)cd | 0.08 (0.02)a | 0.5 (0.06)c | 27.7 (2.65)c | 1.8 (0.28)c | |
| 1.9 (0.14)ab | 0.1 (0.03)ab | 1.0 (0.05)b | 38.3 (2.5)bc | 4.3 (0.7)c | |
| 1.9 (0.05)a | 0.08 (0.01)ab | 0.9 (0.03)b | 27.1 (0.3)c | 5.3 (0.2)b | |
| 1.0 (0.2)ef | 0.04 (0.01)c | 1.0 (0.08)b | 40.6 (0.3)b | 8.3 (0.8)a | |
| 1.7 (0.2)b | 0.07 (0)b | 0.9 (0.08)b | 44.4 (2.1)a | 2.1 (0.2)d | |
| 1.5 (0.08)bc | 0.07 (0.01)b | 0.9 (0.3)b | 32.9 (0.6)b | 0.2 (0)e | |
| 0.9 (0.02)f | 0.05 (0.01)c | 0.7 (0.02)c | 39.8 (2.5)b | 0.2 (0.05)e | |
| 1.5 (0.04)cd | 0.06 (0)c | 1.6 (0.04)a | 39.7 (1.0)b | 0.6 (0.1)e | |
| 1.1 (0.09)e | 0.1 (0.01)a | 0.7 (0.01)c | 26.7 (0.6)c | 1.5 (0.02)d | |
| 0.9 (0.05)f | 0.06 (0.01)c | 0.6 (0.08)c | 23.3 (0.6)d | 1.8 (0.8)d | |
| 1.5 (0.5)b | 0.07 (0.0)c | 0.8 (0.04)b | 38.1 (1.2)b | 6.0 (0.2)b | |
| 1.6 (0.02)b | 0.05 (0.1)d | 0.8 (0.04)b | 32.2 (1.6)d | 5.8 (0.04)b | |
| 0.8 (0.04)d | 0.17 (0.02)a | 0.8 (0.05)b | 42.7 (0.3)a | 8.8 (0.3)a | |
| 1.7 (0.05)a | 0.10 (0.01)b | 1.0 (0.1)a | 31.0 (1.2)d | 0.4 (0.2)e | |
| 1.0 (0.2)c | 0.07 (0.01)c | 0.7 (0.03)c | 35.3 (0.3)c | 0.5 (0.2)e | |
| 0.9 (0.1)c | 0.10 (0.02)b | 0.6 (0.01)d | 33.8 (0)d | 1.4 (0)d | |
| 0.9 (0.1)c | 0.10 (0)b | 0.6 (0.03)d | 26.8 (1.3)e | 2.0 (0.08)c | |
Figure 2Principal components analysis for nine plant species exposed to mammal herbivores at three locations. iHeight = pre-exclosure removal height; iMass = pre-exclosure removal biomass (g), impact = post harvest biomass (1 - P) – see Methods. a = Whiteman Park, b = Huntly, c = BBM. Names for species are shown in italics.