Literature DB >> 17966077

Cranioplasty for large skull defects with PMMA (Polymethylmethacrylate) or Tutoplast processed autogenic bone grafts.

R J Kriegel1, C Schaller, H Clusmann.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Aim of the study was a comparison of cranioplasty using the Tutoplast technology for autogenic bone processing and conventional polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) calvarial re- construction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out in a consecutive series of 61 plastic reconstructions for skull defects, the largest measuring more than 12 cm. Cranioplasty was either performed with PMMA or with the patient's own bone graft which had been recycled using the Tutoplast process.
RESULTS: 36 patients with a mean age of 44 (range 10-68) years underwent freehand PMMA cranioplasty following craniectomy for increased intracranial pressure (19 patients, 52.8%), infection (15 patients, 41.7%), or traumatic bone destruction (2 patients, 5.6%). Bilateral procedures were performed in 10 patients (27.8%). Mean follow-up was 44 months. Four patients (11.1%) died, 14 (38.9%) remained severely disabled, and 18 (50%) made a satisfactory recovery. Two patients (5.6%) had PMMA-related complications and required removal. 26 patients exhibited at least satisfactory cosmetic results (83.9%), in 5 patients the results were not satisfactory (16.1%) and in 5 the results are unknown. Twenty-five patients with a mean age of 42 (range 2-68) years received Tutoplast processed autografts following craniectomy for elevated intracranial pressure. Bilateral procedures were performed in 3 patients (12%). Mean follow-up was 15 months. One patient (4%) died, 18 (72%) remained severely disabled, and 6 (24%) made a satisfactory recovery. All patients had satisfactory cosmetic results, but 2 patients (8.3%) required removal at a later stage, one due to infection (4.2%) and one for bone resorption (4.2%). In the 18 patients with follow-up >0.5 years significant resorption occurred in all 5 children and adolescents (100%) and in two adult patients (15.4%).
CONCLUSION: Cosmetic results were more satisfactory with Tutoplast processed autografts, and the operating time for unilateral surgery was shorter. Complication rates were similar. Resorption occurred in all children and adolescents, but was rare in adults. Thus, Tutoplast processed autogenic bone grafts can be a reasonable alternative to other methods of cranioplasty in adult patients with large craniotomy defects. Cranioplasty in children and adolescents remains an unsolved problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17966077     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-985857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Neurochir        ISSN: 0044-4251


  9 in total

Review 1.  The storage of skull bone flaps for autologous cranioplasty: literature review.

Authors:  Vicente Mirabet; Daniel García; Nuria Yagüe; Luis Roberto Larrea; Cristina Arbona; Carlos Botella
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.522

2.  Complications of cranioplasty following decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jack Henry; Michael Amoo; Adam Murphy; David P O'Brien
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.216

Review 3.  A review of reconstructive materials for use in craniofacial surgery bone fixation materials, bone substitutes, and distractors.

Authors:  James Tait Goodrich; Adam L Sandler; Oren Tepper
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Use of the "mortise and tenon" principle in the augmentation of autologous cranioplasty using bone cement in a child.

Authors:  Chien-Hsun Li; Shih-Hung Yang; Huei-Shyong Wang; Yong-Kwang Tu; Meng-Fai Kuo
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Comparison of failure mechanisms for cements used in skeletal luting applications.

Authors:  O Clarkin; D Boyd; M R Towler
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Labial repositioning using polymethylmethracylate (PMMA)-based cement for esthetic smile rehabilitation-A case report.

Authors:  Toni Arcuri; Maykson Feitosa Pereira da Costa; Iury Machado Ribeiro; Byron Daia Barreto; João Paulo Lyra eSilva
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-07-17

7.  Aseptic bone-flap resorption after cranioplasty - incidence and risk factors.

Authors:  Ali Rashidi; I Erol Sandalcioglu; Michael Luchtmann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Human endothelial-like differentiated precursor cells maintain their endothelial characteristics when cocultured with mesenchymal stem cell and seeded onto human cancellous bone.

Authors:  Dirk Henrich; Kerstin Wilhelm; Joerg Warzecha; Johannes Frank; John Barker; Ingo Marzi; Caroline Seebach
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2013-02-17       Impact factor: 4.711

Review 9.  Complications of cranioplasty in relationship to traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David Shepetovsky; Gianluca Mezzini; Lorenzo Magrassi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.042

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.