Literature DB >> 17965765

Protective effect of Adhatoda vascia Nees against radiation-induced damage at cellular, biochemical and chromosomal levels in Swiss albino mice.

Meenal Kumar1, Ravindra Samarth, Madhu Kumar, Senthamil R Selvan, Begraj Saharan, Ashok Kumar.   

Abstract

Extract of Adhatoda vasica (L) Nees leaves has been used for treatment of various diseases and disorders in Ayurved and Unani medicine. Modulatory effect of ethanolic extract of A. vasica (L) Nees against radiation-induced changes in terms of histological alterations in testis, reduced glutathione (GSH), lipid peroxidation (LPO), acid and alkaline phosphatases levels, and chromosomal alterations in Swiss albino mice was studied at various post-irradiation intervals between 1 and 30 days. Mice exposed to 8 Gy radiation showed radiation-induced sickness including marked changes in histology of testis and chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells with 100% mortality within 22 days. When ethanolic leaf extract of A. vasica was given orally at a dose of 800 mg kg(-1) body weight per mouse for 15 consecutive days and then exposed to radiation, death of Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice was reduced to 70% at 30 days. The radiation dose reduction factor was 1.43. There was significantly lesser degree of damage to testis tissue architecture and various cell populations including spermatogonia, spermatids and Leydig cells. Correspondingly, a significant decrease in the LPO and an increase in the GSH levels were observed in testis and liver of Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice. Similarly, a significant decrease in level of acid phosphatase and increase in level of alkaline phosphatase were observed. Adhatoda pretreatment significantly prevented radiation-induced chromosomal damage in bone marrow cells. The study suggests that Adhatoda plant extract has significant radioprotective effects on testis that warrants further mechanistic studies aimed at identifying the role of major ingredients in the extract.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GSH; LPO; acid and alkaline phosphatases; gamma radiation; testis

Year:  2007        PMID: 17965765      PMCID: PMC1978234          DOI: 10.1093/ecam/nel098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med        ISSN: 1741-427X            Impact factor:   2.629


Introduction

The primary objective of this investigation is to develop and evaluate potential radioprotective phytochemicals in the events of radiation exposures and accidents. A survey of literature may show that plant extracts from Ocimum sanctum (1,2), soya (3), Vitis vinifera (grape seed) (4), Adhatoda vasicagle marmelos (5), Spirulina fusiformis (6), Mentha piperita (7), Brassica compestris (8), Amaranthus paniculatus (9), Withania somnifera (10) and Ginsan (11) possess potential radioprotective activity in mammals. We have recently observed that A. vasica Nees (Family: Acanthaceae) has restored hematological changes caused by irradiation in Swiss albino mice (12). A vasica, an evergreen gregarious and perennial shrub (Fig. 1), has been used as an herbal remedy for allergen-induced bronchial obstruction (13,14), asthma (15,16), tuberculosis (17–19) and possesses antioxidant and chemopreventive agent. Since it enhances the activities of glutathione S-transferase in the liver of mice (20), we have examined the effects of A. vasica extracts on the levels of reduced glutathione (GSH) in liver, lipid peroxidation (LPO), and acid and alkaline phosphatases in testis of normal and irradiated mice. In addition, we have determined the radioprotective potential of A. vasica in terms of restoration of radiation-induced effects on the tissue architecture and cellularity of testis, and chromosome aberrations in the bone marrow cells.
Figure 1.

Adhatoda vasica Nees.

Adhatoda vasica Nees.

Methods

Mice

Swiss albino male mice (Mus musculus), 6–8 weeks old with body weight of 24 ± 2 g, were used. Mice were obtained from Hamdard University, New Delhi, India and maintained and bred in mouse house, as an inbred colony as per norms laid down by an Institutional Ethical Committee, given standard mouse food and water ad libitum.

Irradiation

Mice were irradiated by 60Co source in the cobalt teletherapy unit (ATC-C9) at Radiation Oncology Department, Sawai Man Singh Medical College and Hospital, Jaipur, India. The mice were kept in ventilated box with a distance of 77.5 cm from the source to deliver a dose-rate of 1.33 Gy min−1.

Adhatoda Extract

Fresh leaves of A. vasica (Fig. 1) were collected from the Herbarium, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur, India and shade-dried. Dried leaves were subjected to three changes of 80% ethanol at room temperature. The extracts were pooled, lyophilized, weighed and preserved at 4°C until use.

Experimental Design

Mice were randomly divided into following groups (five per group): Group 1: Normal/sham-irradiated mice were given double-distilled water (DDW) through oral gavage once in a day for 15 consecutive days. Group 2: Mice were treated with 800 mg kg−1 body weight of A. vasica dried extract dissolved in distilled water through oral gavage for 15 consecutive days. Group 3: Mice were given distilled water for 15 days and then exposed to 8 Gy dose of gamma radiation. This group served as positive control. Group 4: Extract of A. vasica was given 800 mg kg−1 body weight of mouse orally for 15 days and after 30 min of last dose; they were exposed to 8 Gy dose of gamma radiation. Following various treatments, mice were autopsied by cervical dislocation on days 1, 3, 7, 14 and 30. Testis were surgically removed, weighed and fixed in Bouin's fluid. The tissue was embedded in a paraffin block after dehydrating with increasing concentrations of 70, 90 and 100% ethanol. Five micrometer sections were cut using hand microtomy, were placed on glass slide and were stained with Harris hematoxylin and eosin. Stained tissue sections were observed under light microscope (Olympus) to determine histopathological changes.

Survival Assay

For survival studies mice of both control and experimental groups were exposed to whole body gamma radiation (6, 8 and 10 Gy) and were checked daily for 30 days. The survival percentage of mice up to 30 days of exposure against each radiation dose was used to construct survival dose–response curves. Regression analysis was done to obtain LD50/30 values and to determine dose reduction factor (DRF).

Cytogenetics of Bone Marrow Cells

Mice (all groups) were injected intraperitoneally with 0.025% colchicine and sacrificed 2 h later by cervical dislocation. Femurs were dissected out and bone marrow cells were aspirated and washed in physiological saline, treated hypotonically (0.075 M KCl), and fixed in Carnoy's fixative and stained with 4% Giemsa. Metaphase slides were prepared by air-drying method of Savage (21). Chromosomal aberrations were scored using oil immersion (with 100× object lens) under a light microscope.

GSH Assay

GSH in liver was measured using the method described by Moron et al. (22). Liver homogenates were treated with 0.1 ml of 25% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) and the resulting precipitate was pelleted by centrifugation at 3900 g for 10 min. Free endogenous sulfhydryl was assayed in a total 3 ml volume by adding 2 ml of 0.5 mM 5, 5′-dithio-bis(2-nitro benzoic acid) (DTNB) prepared in 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 8) to 1 ml of the supernatant. The GSH reacts with DTNB and forms a yellow-colored complex with DTNB. The absorbance was read at 412 nm using UV-VIS Systronic spectrophotometer.

LPO Assay

LPO levels in testis and liver were estimated by the method of Ohkawa et al. (23) as thiobarbituric acid (TBA) reactive substances. The liver and testis were dissected out and chilled in ice cold 0.09% NaCl. Homogenate of desired tissues were prepared in 1.15% KCl (1 g tissue in 9 ml of 1.15% KCl). Sodium dodecyl sulfate (8.1%; 0.2 ml) was added to 0.2 ml of sample in test tubes and pH was adjusted to 3.5 with 5 M NaOH. To this, 1.5 ml of 0.8% aqueous solution of TBA was added. The mixture was made up to 4 ml with distilled water and heated at 95°C for 60 min. After cooling under tap water, 1 ml of distilled water and 5 ml a mixture of n-butanol and pyridine (15:1) were added and shaken vigorously. The solution was centrifuged at 3900 g for 10 min. The upper organic layer was removed and absorbance was measured at 532 nm using UV-VIS Systronic spectrophotometer.

Acid and Alkaline Phosphatase Activity

Acid and alkaline phosphatase activities in testes were estimated using the method described by Fiske and Subbarow (24). The tissue homogenates were mixed with TCA and then centrifuged at 3900 g for 10 min. The supernatant was then treated with molybdate solution. (Molybdate solution was prepared by dissolving 25 g of ammonium molybdate into 200 ml glass distilled water (GDW) and combining with 300 ml of 10 N H2SO4 and then was made up to 1000 ml with GDW.) This resulted in the formation of phosphomolybdic acid from the phosphate present in the tissue. The phosphomolybdic acid was then reduced by 1-anilino-8-naphthalenesulfonic acid (ANSA) to produce a blue color whose intensity was proportional to the amount of phosphate liberated. The alkaline phosphatase activity is the difference between inorganic phosphate content of the incubated and control samples expressed as Bodansky units. One Bodansky unit corresponds to the liberation of 1 mg of inorganic phosphorous from the tissue in mg g−1 h−1 (24).

Statistical Analysis

Student's t-test was employed to analyze the results (25). P-values <0.05 were considered significant. Regression analysis was done to obtain LD50/30 values and to determine DRF.

Results

Dose Reduction Factor

Adhatoda leaves (Fig. 1) extract (AE) was given as 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1200 mg kg−1 body weight of mouse per day in DDW orally to Swiss albino mice for 15 consecutive days. The extract was non-toxic and no mortality was observed till day 30. An optimum dose of 800 mg kg−1 body weight of AE was selected against 8 Gy radiations on the basis of maximum survivability as depicted in Fig. 2. The percent survival was significantly increased in AE-fed mice subsequently treated with irradiation (AE-pretreated irradiated mice). When survival data were fit on regression line equation, LD50/30 values for control (irradiated alone) and experimental (AE plus irradiation) were computed as 6.47 and 9.3 Gy, respectively. On basis of these LD50/30 values, AE pretreatment produced a DRF of 1.43.
Figure 2.

Survival–dose–response curves for determination of LD50/30. Control and experimental (Adhatoda-pretreated; 800 mg kg−1 body weight) groups were exposed to whole body gamma radiation at 6, 8 and 10 Gy and were checked daily for 30 days. In Adhatoda-pretreated mice, a maximum survival of 70% was observed at radiation dose rate of 8 Gy. Regression analysis was done to obtain LD50/30 values and to determine dose reduction factor (DRF).

Survival–dose–response curves for determination of LD50/30. Control and experimental (Adhatoda-pretreated; 800 mg kg−1 body weight) groups were exposed to whole body gamma radiation at 6, 8 and 10 Gy and were checked daily for 30 days. In Adhatoda-pretreated mice, a maximum survival of 70% was observed at radiation dose rate of 8 Gy. Regression analysis was done to obtain LD50/30 values and to determine dose reduction factor (DRF).

Inhibition of Radiation-Induced Change in Total Body Weight by A. vasica

As depicted in Table 1, in AE-treated mice, there was no significant change in body weight on days 1, 3, 7 and 14 while a significant increase (P < 0.01) was observed on day 30 when compared with mice fed with distilled water alone. Notably, in irradiated mice, the body weight was drastically decreased on day 3, (P < 0.001), day 7 (P < 0.001) and day 14 (P < 0.001) when compared with mice treated with distilled water only. In AE-pretreated irradiated mice, the body weight significantly increased on day 3 (P > 0.05), day 7 (P < 0.01) and day 14 (P < 0.001) of observation as compared to irradiated group. To note, by day 30, all mice died in radiation-treated group, but in AE-pretreated irradiated group, 70% mice survived.
Table 1.

Change in body weight and testis weight of male Swiss albino mice in different groups

Experimental groupsDay 1Day 3Day 7Day 14Day 30
Body weight (g)
    Normal (DDW)21.32 ± 1.0522.34 ± 0.8524.33 ± 1.2224.65 ± 1.1626.23 ± 1.18
    Adhatoda alone (800 mg kg−1 body weight)21.25 ± 0.2222.41 ± 1.2025.33 ± 2.1425.32 ± 1.0030.22 ± 0.70**
    Radiation (8 Gy)20.3 ± 0.6218.0 ± 0.25***17.0 ± 0.16***16.30 ± 0.24***No survival
    Adhatoda + radiation (800 mg kg−1 body weight + 8 Gy)21.05 ± 0.6820.01 ± 0.69*21.00 ± 1.32**24.50 ± 1.33***26.00 ± 1.80
Testis weight (mg)
    Normal (DDW)74.00 ± 0.5775.26 ± 0.8876.01 ± 1.2275.22 ± 0.8476.22 ± 0.78
    Adhatoda alone (800 mg kg−1 body weight)75.00 ± 1.5574.00 ± 1.9977.00 ± 2.3477.50 ± 1.8682.00 ± 2.34*
    Radiation (8 Gy)71.40 ± 0.71*68.60 ± 1.62***58.80 ± 1.33***36.60 ± 2.87***No survival
    Adhatoda + radiation (800 mg kg−1 body weight + 8 Gy)72.10 ± 2.0572.50 ± 0.80*63.50 ± 0.89**60.90 ± 1.55***68.90 ± 2.12

Values are depicted as Mean ± SD.

Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Change in body weight and testis weight of male Swiss albino mice in different groups Values are depicted as Mean ± SD. Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Inhibits Changes in Testis A. vasica

Mice treated with A. vasica extract alone showed no significant change in weight of the testis on days 1, 3, 7 and 14 (Table 1). However, on day 30, a significant weight increase (P < 0.05) was observed as compared to mice treated with distilled water. Mice treated with radiation alone (8 Gy; Group 3) showed reduction in the testis weight during all days of observation (day 1: P < 0.05; day 3: P < 0.001; day 7: P < 0.001 and day 14: P < 0.001). Whereas in Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated group (AE plus radiation), there was a significant increase in testis weight after day 3 (P < 0.05), 7 (P < 0.01) and 14 (P < 0.001) when compared with irradiated mice (Table 1). In irradiated mice, there was a drastic depletion of spermatogonial population with necrotic and pyknotic nuclei were observed (Fig. 3B) when compared with mice treated with distilled water (Fig. 3A). The germinal epithelium was highly disorganized with shrinkage of tubules and cytoplasmic vacuolization (Fig. 3C). Total absence of sperm and spermatids were observed. Sertoli cells and Leydig cells showed shrinkage in their size (Fig. 3D). While in mice pretreated with AE, less damage to spermatogonial population and germinal epithelium was observed with more rapid recovery (Fig. 3E). In irradiated mice, there was significant decrease in number of spermatogonia type A and type B was noticed on all days of observation (Fig. 3B–D). Similar decrease was also found in the number of primary spermatocyte, secondary spermatocyte and spermatid. Notably, in mice pretreated with AE and then exposed to radiation dose, the quality (as determined by intact germinal epithelium, no pyknosis, necrosis, karyolysis present, less cytoplasmic vacuolization) and number of germ cells increased by day 30, the histology of testis revealed near normal histoarchitecture except some cytoplasmic vacuolization and lumen with full of sperms (Fig. 3G).
Figure 3.

Modulation of radiation-induced histological changes in testis of mice by A. vasica extract. (A) Normal testis showing compact and organized arrangement of spermatogenic cells, spermatogonia types A and B, primary spermatocytes, secondary spermatocytes, spermatids, Sertoli cells and Leydig cells. (B) Exposure to irradiation at day 1: distortion of germinal epithelium and depletion of spermatogonia were evident. (C) Shrinkage of tubule with broken germinal epithelium at day 3 of radiation exposure was seen. (D) More shrinkage of tubules at day 7. Cytoplasmic vacuolization was observed. (E) In Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice, at day 1, less damage with increased spermatogonial population was observed. (F) In Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice at day 3, increase in germ cell population and less cytoplasmic vacuolization was observed. (G) In Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice at day 30, there was an increase in tubular diameter with reduced interstitium and testis had its normal structure.

Modulation of radiation-induced histological changes in testis of mice by A. vasica extract. (A) Normal testis showing compact and organized arrangement of spermatogenic cells, spermatogonia types A and B, primary spermatocytes, secondary spermatocytes, spermatids, Sertoli cells and Leydig cells. (B) Exposure to irradiation at day 1: distortion of germinal epithelium and depletion of spermatogonia were evident. (C) Shrinkage of tubule with broken germinal epithelium at day 3 of radiation exposure was seen. (D) More shrinkage of tubules at day 7. Cytoplasmic vacuolization was observed. (E) In Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice, at day 1, less damage with increased spermatogonial population was observed. (F) In Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice at day 3, increase in germ cell population and less cytoplasmic vacuolization was observed. (G) In Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice at day 30, there was an increase in tubular diameter with reduced interstitium and testis had its normal structure.

Reduction of Radiation-Induced Chromosomal Aberrations by A. vasica

The exposure to radiation caused severe cytogenetic damages in bone marrow cells (Fig. 4B) when compared with mice treated with distilled water (Fig. 4A). Various types of aberration like chromatid breaks, chromosome breaks, fragments, and rings, chromosome exchange, and dicentric characteristics were observed in irradiated group (Fig. 4B). In contrast, in AE-pretreated irradiated mice, a significantly lesser degree of these aberrations were observed (Fig. 4C).
Figure 4.

Modulation of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells of mice by A. vasica extract. (A) Normal metaphase showing 40 chromosomes in mice treated with distilled water. (B) Irradiation-induced chromatid breaks, exchange and translocation (white arrows). (C) Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice with representative near normal chromosomes.

Modulation of radiation-induced chromosomal aberrations in bone marrow cells of mice by A. vasica extract. (A) Normal metaphase showing 40 chromosomes in mice treated with distilled water. (B) Irradiation-induced chromatid breaks, exchange and translocation (white arrows). (C) Adhatoda-pretreated irradiated mice with representative near normal chromosomes.

Inhibition of GSH Levels in Liver by A. vasica

Glutathione level in liver was found to significantly increase at autopsy intervals of day 7 (P < 0.05), day 14 (0.001) and day 30 (P < 0.001) in Adhatoda-treated mice when compared with mice treated with distilled water (Table 2). In irradiated group, the GSH content showed significant decrease at all autopsy intervals. Notably, as shown in Table 2, in AE-pretreated irradiated mice, a significant increase in GSH content was observed at all intervals when compared with irradiated mice.
Table 2.

Reduced glutathione (GSH) levels (μmol g−1 of tissue) wet weight in the liver of Swiss albino mice in different groups

Experimental groupsAutopsy intervals (in days)
Day 1Day 3Day 7Day 14Day 30
Adhatoda alone (800 mg kg−1 body weight)94.26 ± 1.4595.20 ± 1.3797.28 ± 1.68*102.68 ± 1.94***103.66 ± 1.85***
Radiation (8 Gy)50.25 ± 2.17***42.12 ± 1.56***40.38 ± 1.56***45.10 ± 1.50***No survival
Adhatoda + radiation (800 mg kg−1 body weight + 8 Gy)54.25 ± 1.54*55.02 ± 1.55***62.60 ± 2.40***66.40 ± 1.65***80.82 ± 2.68

Values are depicted as Mean ± SD.

Normal (DDW): 93.20 ± 1.62.

Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Reduced glutathione (GSH) levels (μmol g−1 of tissue) wet weight in the liver of Swiss albino mice in different groups Values are depicted as Mean ± SD. Normal (DDW): 93.20 ± 1.62. Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Inhibition of upregulation of LPO Levels in Liver and Testis by A. vasica

In Adhatoda extract (AE)-treated mice, a significant decrease in LPO level in liver was noticed on day 14 (P < 0.01) and day 30 (P < 0.05) as compared to those treated with distilled water (Table 3). In irradiated group, LPO level was increased (P < 0.001) at all autopsy intervals of observation in terms of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). On the other hand, in AE-pretreated irradiated mice, a significant inhibition in LPO level was observed (Table 3).
Table 3.

Change in lipid peroxidation activity (nmol of MDA mg−1 of tissue) in liver and testis of Swiss albino mice in different groups

Experimental groupsLPO levels in liver
Day 1Day 3Day 7Day 14Day 30
Adhatoda alone (800 mg kg−1 body weight)3.11 ± 0.123.42 ± 0.123.41 ± 0.102.30 ± 0.15**2.48 ± 0.26*
Radiation (8 Gy)6.63 ± 0.10***11.12 ± 0.15***14.12 ± 0.16***12.05 ± 0.20***No survival
Adhatoda + radiation (800 mg kg−1 body weight + 8 Gy)5.01 ± 0.18***6.42 ± 0.14***7.77 ± 0.16**4.24 ± 0.12***5.99 ± 0.14

Values are depicted as Mean ± SD.

Normal (DDW): 3.69 ± 0.16.

Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Change in lipid peroxidation activity (nmol of MDA mg−1 of tissue) in liver and testis of Swiss albino mice in different groups Values are depicted as Mean ± SD. Normal (DDW): 3.69 ± 0.16. Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation. The LPO level in testis of A. vasica-treated mice was significantly (P < 0.05) decreased on day 14 and day 30 as compared to those treated with distilled water (Table 4). In irradiated group, a noticeable elevation of LPO was observed at all intervals from day 1 to day 14. In AE plus radiation experiment group, a significant (P < 0.001) reduction in LPO level was seen from day 3 onwards as compared to irradiated group (Table 4).
Table 4.

Change in lipid peroxidation activity (nmol of MDA mg−1 of tissue) in liver and testis of Swiss albino mice in different groups

Experimental groupsLPO levels in testis
Day 1Day 3Day 7Day 14Day 30
Adhatoda alone (800 mg kg−1 body weight)1.39 ± 0.151.32 ± 0.141.18 ± 0.100.86 ± 0.10*0.82 ± 0.06*
Radiation (8 Gy)6.20 ± 0.16***9.01 ± 0.20***12.12 ± 0.18***9.10 ± 0.12***No survival
Adhatoda + radiation (800 mg kg−1 body weight + 8 Gy)4.42 ± 0.105.10 ± 0.18***5.44 ± 0.16**4.08 ± 0.20***2.46 ± 0.18

Values are depicted as Mean ± SD.

Normal (DDW): 1.65 ± 0.24.

Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Change in lipid peroxidation activity (nmol of MDA mg−1 of tissue) in liver and testis of Swiss albino mice in different groups Values are depicted as Mean ± SD. Normal (DDW): 1.65 ± 0.24. Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Modulation of Radiation-Induced Change of Alkaline Phosphatase and Acid Levels in Testis

Alkaline phosphatase activity showed no significant changes in A. vasica-treated mice as compared to those treated with distilled water except on day 30 there was a significant increase (Table 5). In irradiated group, the alkaline phosphatase activity in testis showed remarkable and significant decline (P < 0.001) on all days of observation. In AE-pretreated irradiated mice, a significant recovery in alkaline phosphatase activity was observed.
Table 5.

Change in alkaline and acid phosphatase activity (mg pi g−1 h−1) in the testis of male Swiss albino mice in different groups

Experimental groupsAlkaline phosphatase level
Day 1Day 3Day 7Day 14Day 30
Adhatoda alone (800 mg kg−1 body weight)5.36 ± 0.205.44 ± 0.65.38 ± 0.195.50 ± 0.226.02 ± 0.20*
Radiation (8 Gy)2.81 ± 0.12***1.88 ± 0.10***1.59 ± 0.12***2.24 ± 0.12***No survival
Adhatoda + radiation (800 mg kg−1 body weight + 8 Gy)3.46 ± 0.22**4.36 ± 0.04***4.24 ± 0.29***4.40 ± 0.04***4.34 ± 0.03

Values are depicted as Mean ± SD.

Normal value: 5.40 ± 0.32.

Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Change in alkaline and acid phosphatase activity (mg pi g−1 h−1) in the testis of male Swiss albino mice in different groups Values are depicted as Mean ± SD. Normal value: 5.40 ± 0.32. Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation. The acid phosphatase activity in testis was found at normal level in A. vasica group as compared to mice treated with distilled water at all autopsy intervals (Table 6). In irradiated group, a highly significant (P < 0.001) elevation in the enzyme level was observed. In AE-pretreated irradiated mice, a significant (P < 0.001) decline in acid phosphatase activity was observed at all autopsy intervals in comparison to irradiated mice.
Table 6.

Change in alkaline and acid phosphatase activity (mg pi g−1 h−1) in the testis of male Swiss albino mice in different groups

Experimental groupsAcid phosphatase level
Day 1Day 3Day 7Day 14Day 30
Adhatoda alone (800 mg kg−1 body weight)3.30 ± 0.073.36 ± 0.043.20 ± 0.083.41 ± 0.103.46 ± 0.12
Radiation (8 Gy)4.34 ± 0.03***5.29 ± 0.12***7.04 ± 0.10***6.80 ± 0.04***No survival
Adhatoda + radiation (800 mg kg−1 body weight + 8 Gy)3.34 ± 0.13***4.81 ± 0.20***5.25 ± 0.08***3.50 ± 0.10***3.75 ± 0.12

Values are depicted as Mean ± SD.

Normal value: 3.41 ± 0.04.

Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Change in alkaline and acid phosphatase activity (mg pi g−1 h−1) in the testis of male Swiss albino mice in different groups Values are depicted as Mean ± SD. Normal value: 3.41 ± 0.04. Significance level: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Statistical comparison: Adhatoda versus normal (DDW); radiation versus normal (DDW); Adhatoda + radiation versus radiation.

Discussion

Our results confirm the contention of earlier reports (26–30) that irradiation-induced cell death may be a result of accumulation of free radicals, LPO, disruption in the membranes including cellular, nuclear and organelle, leakage of lysosomal acid phosphatases, changes in the surface properties of chromosomes leading to stickiness, breakage of double-strands of DNA and chromosomal aberrations. We were able to clearly document that the extracts of A. vasica significantly restore the glutathione level in the liver, and LPO; acid phosphatase and alkaline phosphatase in testis of mice exposed to irradiation. Furthermore, we observed that the extracts of A. vasica, reduced the stickiness of chromosomes and the chromosomal aberrations induced by radiation. Such a profound effect is observed just after 15 day treatment of A. vasica extract. There is no doubt that the prolonged treatment would yield much improved results. Obviously, the significant increase in increased survival in A. vasica-fed mice could be due to the antioxidant property of A. vasica, as evidenced by restoration of glutathione and LPO levels. Restoration of acid phosphatase level points out the role of the extracts of A. vasica in promoting the stability of cellular, nuclear and organelle membranes. The phytochemical that is responsible for the observed effects of A. vasica is far from clear although the extracts contain several alkaloids such as vasicine, vasicinone and a quinazoline-alkaloid, peganin (31–36). There is a need to test these individual alkaloids for their ability to protect radiation-induced accumulation of free radicals, membrane damage and double-strand breakage. Our future goal is to characterize the relative role of these alkaloids in radioprotection.
  31 in total

1.  Radiation protection by the ocimum flavonoids orientin and vicenin: mechanisms of action.

Authors:  P Uma Devi; A Ganasoundari; B Vrinda; K K Srinivasan; M K Unnikrishnan
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Evaluation of radioprotective effects of Rajgira (Amaranthus paniculatus) extract in Swiss albino mice.

Authors:  Anita Krishna; Ashok Kumar
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 3.  Genistein chemoprevention: timing and mechanisms of action in murine mammary and prostate.

Authors:  Coral A Lamartiniere; Michelle S Cotroneo; Wayne A Fritz; Jun Wang; Roycelynn Mentor-Marcel; Ada Elgavish
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.798

4.  Chronic toxicity studies with vasicine from Adhatoda vasica Nees. in rats and monkeys.

Authors:  G S Pahwa; U Zutshi; C K Atal
Journal:  Indian J Exp Biol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 0.818

5.  Modulatory influence of Adhatoda vasica Nees leaf extract against gamma irradiation in Swiss albino mice.

Authors:  A Kumar; J Ram; R M Samarth; M Kumar
Journal:  Phytomedicine       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.340

6.  Chemomodulatory action of Brassica compestris (var sarason) on hepatic carcinogen metabolizing enzymes, antioxidant profiles and lipid peroxidation.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar; Samir Qiblawi; A K Khan; S Banerjee; A R Rao
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2004 Apr-Jun

7.  New antiasthmatic drugs from traditional medicine?

Authors:  W Dorsch; H Wagner
Journal:  Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol       Date:  1991

8.  Mentha piperita (Linn.) leaf extract provides protection against radiation induced chromosomal damage in bone marrow of mice.

Authors:  R M Samarth; Ashok Kumar
Journal:  Indian J Exp Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.818

9.  Toxicity of azathioprine and monocrotaline in murine sinusoidal endothelial cells and hepatocytes: the role of glutathione and relevance to hepatic venoocclusive disease.

Authors:  L D DeLeve; X Wang; J F Kuhlenkamp; N Kaplowitz
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 17.425

10.  Roots of Withania somnifera Inhibit Forestomach and Skin Carcinogenesis in Mice.

Authors:  Bandhuvula Padmavathi; Pramod C Rath; Araga Ramesha Rao; Rana Pratap Singh
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 2.629

View more
  8 in total

1.  Radiation-Induced Testicular Injury and Its Amelioration by Tinospora cordifolia (An Indian Medicinal Plant) Extract.

Authors:  Priyanka Sharma; Jyoti Parmar; Priyanka Sharma; Preeti Verma; P K Goyal
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 2.  In vitro biotechnological advancements in Malabar nut (Adhatoda vasica Nees): Achievements, status and prospects.

Authors:  Saikat Gantait; Jitendriya Panigrahi
Journal:  J Genet Eng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-03-19

Review 3.  Natural Radioprotectors on Current and Future Perspectives: A Mini-Review.

Authors:  Pooja Shivappa; Grisilda Vidya Bernhardt
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-18

4.  Ficus racemosa Stem Bark Extract: A Potent Antioxidant and a Probable Natural Radioprotector.

Authors:  V P Veerapur; K R Prabhakar; Vipan Kumar Parihar; Machendar Reddy Kandadi; S Ramakrishana; B Mishra; B S Satish Rao; K K Srinivasan; K I Priyadarsini; M K Unnikrishnan
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.629

5.  Phytic Acid Exposure Alters AflatoxinB1-induced Reproductive and Oxidative Toxicity in Albino Rats (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  Abdelaziz S Abu El-Saad; Hamada M Mahmoud
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 2.629

6.  Management of Radiation Injuries by Panax ginseng Extract.

Authors:  Preeti Verma; Swafiya Jahan; Tae Hawn Kim; Pradeep Kumar Goyal
Journal:  J Ginseng Res       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 6.060

7.  REC-2006-A Fractionated Extract of Podophyllum hexandrum Protects Cellular DNA from Radiation-Induced Damage by Reducing the Initial Damage and Enhancing Its Repair In Vivo.

Authors:  Pankaj Chaudhary; Sandeep Kumar Shukla; Rakesh Kumar Sharma
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 8.  Utilization of cytogenetic biomarkers as a tool for assessment of radiation injury and evaluation of radiomodulatory effects of various medicinal plants - a review.

Authors:  Ravindra M Samarth; Meenakshi Samarth; Yoshihisa Matsumoto
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 4.162

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.