Literature DB >> 17965334

Effect of prebreeding body weight or progestin exposure before breeding on beef heifer performance through the second breeding season.

J L Martin1, K W Creighton, J A Musgrave, T J Klopfenstein, R T Clark, D C Adams, R N Funston.   

Abstract

Two experiments evaluated prebreeding target BW or progestin exposure for heifers developed lighter than traditional recommendations. Experiment 1 evaluated the effects of the system on heifer performance through subsequent calving and rebreeding over 3 yr. Heifers (229 kg) were assigned randomly to be developed to 55% of mature BW (299 kg) before a 45-d breeding season (intensive, INT; n = 119) or 50% of mature BW (272 kg) before a 60-d breeding season (relaxed, RLX; n = 142). Prebreeding and pregnancy diagnosis BW were greater (P <or= 0.006) for INT than RLX heifers. Overall pregnancy rate did not differ (88.4%; P = 0.51), but RLX heifers had later calving dates (7 d; P < 0.001) and lighter calf weaning weights (194 +/- 4 vs. 199 +/- 4 kg; P < 0.07) compared with INT heifers. Calf birth weight, calving difficulty, second-calf conception rates, and 2-yr-old retention rate did not differ (P > 0.15) between systems. Cost per pregnant 2-yr-old cow was less for the RLX than the INT heifer development system. Of heifers that failed to become pregnant, a greater proportion (P = 0.07) of heifers in the RLX than in the INT system were prepubertal when the breeding season began. Therefore, a second 2-yr experiment evaluated melengestrol acetate (MGA, 0.5 mg/d) as a means of hastening puberty in heifers developed to 50% of mature BW. Heifers were assigned randomly to the control (n = 103) or MGA (n = 81) treatment for 14 d and were placed with bulls 13 d later for 45 d. Prebreeding and pregnancy diagnosis BW were similar (280 and 380 kg, respectively; P > 0.10) for heifers in the control and MGA treatments. The proportion of heifers pubertal before breeding (74%), pregnancy rate (90%), calving date, calf weaning weight, and second breeding season pregnancy rate (92%) were similar (P > 0.10) between treatments. Developing heifers to 50 or 55% of mature BW resulted in similar overall pregnancy rates, and supplementing the diets of heifers developed to 50% of mature BW with MGA before breeding did not improve reproductive performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17965334     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2007-0233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  9 in total

1.  Effect of postweaning heifer development system on average daily gain, pregnancy rates, and subsequent feed efficiency as a pregnant heifer.

Authors:  S A Springman; H R Nielson; T L Meyer; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Developmental and reproductive characteristics of beef heifers classified by pubertal status at time of first breeding.

Authors:  A J Roberts; A Gomes da Silva; A F Summers; T W Geary; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 3.  BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: Influence of management decisions during heifer development on enhancing reproductive success and cow longevity1.

Authors:  Adam F Summers; Shelby L Rosasco; Eric J Scholljegerdes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effect of heifer frame score on growth, fertility, and economics.

Authors:  S Şentürklü; D G Landblom; G A Perry; T Petry
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.509

5.  Transcriptome profiles in peripheral white blood cells at the time of artificial insemination discriminate beef heifers with different fertility potential.

Authors:  Sarah E Dickinson; Brock A Griffin; Michelle F Elmore; Lisa Kriese-Anderson; Joshua B Elmore; Paul W Dyce; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Evaluation of age, weaning weight, body condition score, and reproductive tract score in pre-selected beef heifers relative to reproductive potential.

Authors:  Sarah E Dickinson; Michelle F Elmore; Lisa Kriese-Anderson; Joshua B Elmore; Bailey N Walker; Paul W Dyce; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-26

7.  Impact of supplemental protein source offered to primiparous heifers during gestation on II. Progeny performance and carcass characteristics.

Authors:  A F Summers; A D Blair; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Rewiring of gene expression in circulating white blood cells is associated with pregnancy outcome in heifers (Bos taurus).

Authors:  Sarah E Moorey; Bailey N Walker; Michelle F Elmore; Joshua B Elmore; Soren P Rodning; Fernando H Biase
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Physical Traits and Reproductive Measurements Associated with Early Conception in Beef Replacement Heifers.

Authors:  Megan S Hindman; Brian Huedepohl; Grant A Dewell; Troy A Brick; Gustavo S Silva; Terry J Engelken
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.231

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.