Literature DB >> 17965272

A circadian rhythm set by dusk determines the expression of FT homologs and the short-day photoperiodic flowering response in Pharbitis.

Ryosuke Hayama1, Bhavna Agashe, Elisabeth Luley, Rod King, George Coupland.   

Abstract

Seasonal control of flowering through responsiveness to daylength shows extreme variation. Different species flower in response to long days or short days (SDs), and this difference evolved several times. The molecular mechanisms conferring these responses have been compared in detail only in Arabidopsis thaliana and rice (Oryza sativa) and suggest that a conserved pathway confers daylength responses through regulation of FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) transcription by CONSTANS (CO). We studied Pharbitis (Ipomoea nil; formerly, Pharbitis nil), a widely used SD model species and a member of the Convolvulaceae, and showed using transgenic plants together with detailed expression analysis that two putative orthologs of FT (Pn FT1 and Pn FT2) promote flowering specifically under SDs. These genes are expressed only under SDs, and light flashes given during the night reduce their expression and prevent flowering. We demonstrate that in Pharbitis a circadian rhythm set by the light-to-dark transition at dusk regulates Pn FT expression, which rises only when the night is longer than 11 h. Furthermore, Pharbitis accessions that differ in their critical night-length responses express Pn FT at different times after dusk, demonstrating that natural genetic variation influencing the clock regulating Pn FT expression alters the flowering response. In these assays, Pn FT mRNA abundance was not related to Pn CO expression, suggesting that Pn FT may be regulated by a different transcription factor in Pharbitis. We conclude that SD response in Pharbitis is controlled by a dedicated light sensitive clock, set by dusk, that activates Pn FT transcription in darkness, a different mechanism for measuring daylength than described for Arabidopsis and rice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17965272      PMCID: PMC2174708          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.107.052480

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  49 in total

1.  Orchestrated transcription of key pathways in Arabidopsis by the circadian clock.

Authors:  S L Harmer; J B Hogenesch; M Straume; H S Chang; B Han; T Zhu; X Wang; J A Kreps; S A Kay
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS.

Authors:  M Yano; Y Katayose; M Ashikari; U Yamanouchi; L Monna; T Fuse; T Baba; K Yamamoto; Y Umehara; Y Nagamura; T Sasaki
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Dissection of floral induction pathways using global expression analysis.

Authors:  Markus Schmid; N Henriette Uhlenhaut; François Godard; Monika Demar; Ray Bressan; Detlef Weigel; Jan U Lohmann
Journal:  Development       Date:  2003-10-22       Impact factor: 6.868

4.  CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees.

Authors:  Henrik Böhlenius; Tao Huang; Laurence Charbonnel-Campaa; Amy M Brunner; Stefan Jansson; Steven H Strauss; Ove Nilsson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  FD, a bZIP protein mediating signals from the floral pathway integrator FT at the shoot apex.

Authors:  Mitsutomo Abe; Yasushi Kobayashi; Sumiko Yamamoto; Yasufumi Daimon; Ayako Yamaguchi; Yoko Ikeda; Harutaka Ichinoki; Michitaka Notaguchi; Koji Goto; Takashi Araki
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  CONSTANS mediates between the circadian clock and the control of flowering in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  P Suárez-López; K Wheatley; F Robson; H Onouchi; F Valverde; G Coupland
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-04-26       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 7.  Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence.

Authors:  Takato Imaizumi; Steve A Kay
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 18.313

8.  Ehd1, a B-type response regulator in rice, confers short-day promotion of flowering and controls FT-like gene expression independently of Hd1.

Authors:  Kazuyuki Doi; Takeshi Izawa; Takuichi Fuse; Utako Yamanouchi; Takahiko Kubo; Zenpei Shimatani; Masahiro Yano; Atsushi Yoshimura
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2004-04-12       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  FLOWERING LOCUS T protein may act as the long-distance florigenic signal in the cucurbits.

Authors:  Ming-Kuem Lin; Helene Belanger; Young-Jin Lee; Erika Varkonyi-Gasic; Ken-Ichiro Taoka; Eriko Miura; Beatriz Xoconostle-Cázares; Karla Gendler; Richard A Jorgensen; Brett Phinney; Tony J Lough; William J Lucas
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 11.277

10.  FT protein acts as a long-range signal in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Katja E Jaeger; Philip A Wigge
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-05-31       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  57 in total

1.  Reduction in the critical dark length for flower induction during aging in the short-day plant Pharbitis nil var. Kidachi.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hasegawa; Mizuki Yamada; Yuiko Iwase; Kaede C Wada; Kiyotoshi Takeno
Journal:  Sex Plant Reprod       Date:  2010-03-23

Review 2.  Stress-induced flowering.

Authors:  Kaede C Wada; Kiyotoshi Takeno
Journal:  Plant Signal Behav       Date:  2010-08-01

3.  De novo transcriptome assembly of Ipomoea nil using Illumina sequencing for gene discovery and SSR marker identification.

Authors:  Changhe Wei; Xiang Tao; Ming Li; Bin He; Lang Yan; Xuemei Tan; Yizheng Zhang
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.291

4.  Two flowering locus T (FT) homologs in Chenopodium rubrum differ in expression patterns.

Authors:  David Cháb; Jan Kolár; Matthew S Olson; Helena Storchová
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.116

5.  Positional cloning and characterization reveal the molecular basis for soybean maturity locus E1 that regulates photoperiodic flowering.

Authors:  Zhengjun Xia; Satoshi Watanabe; Tetsuya Yamada; Yasutaka Tsubokura; Hiroko Nakashima; Hong Zhai; Toyoaki Anai; Shusei Sato; Toshimasa Yamazaki; Shixiang Lü; Hongyan Wu; Satoshi Tabata; Kyuya Harada
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  The genetic basis of flowering responses to seasonal cues.

Authors:  Fernando Andrés; George Coupland
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Expression of flowering-time genes in soybean E1 near-isogenic lines under short and long day conditions.

Authors:  Dhiraj Thakare; Saratha Kumudini; Randy D Dinkins
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 4.116

Review 8.  Changing Responses to Changing Seasons: Natural Variation in the Plasticity of Flowering Time.

Authors:  Benjamin K Blackman
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  The regulatory pathways of distinct flowering characteristics in Chinese jujube.

Authors:  Xianwei Meng; Ying Li; Ye Yuan; Yao Zhang; Hongtai Li; Jin Zhao; Mengjun Liu
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.793

10.  Early evolution of the MFT-like gene family in plants.

Authors:  Harald Hedman; Thomas Källman; Ulf Lagercrantz
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2009-03-14       Impact factor: 4.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.