Literature DB >> 17964442

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: University Hospital Essen experience and metaanalysis of prognostic factors.

Georgios C Sotiropoulos1, Hauke Lang, Silvio Nadalin, Markus Neuhäuser, Ernesto P Molmenti, Hideo A Baba, Andreas Paul, Fuat H Saner, Frank Weber, Philipp Hilgard, Andrea Frilling, Christoph E Broelsch, Massimo Malagó.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Liver transplantation has become one of the best treatment options for early hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. The purpose of this study was to correlate pathologic findings with outcomes after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and to evaluate associations between various tumor characteristics and patient outcomes. STUDY
DESIGN: One hundred patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent liver transplantation at our center during an 8-year period. Fifty-five patients received deceased donor livers and the remaining 45 received live donor grafts. A systematic literature search was performed. Using the truncated product method and Tippet's method p values from the literature were combined with our own results, for a total of 3,107 patients.
RESULTS: For survival, significant associations were found for tumor grading in our series. Tumor recurrence was significantly associated with alpha-fetoprotein levels, tumor grading, vascular invasion, Milan and University of California San Francisco criteria in univariate analysis, and with tumor grading and University of California San Francisco criteria by multivariable analysis. Meta-analysis showed significant associations for all variables evaluated (alpha-fetoprotein, tumor number, tumor size, lobar distribution, vascular invasion, tumor differentiation, Milan criteria, and University of California San Francisco criteria) both for survival and recurrence in the performed univariate truncated product method analyses. Interestingly, metaanalysis of the available multivariable studies showed no significant associations between Milan/University of California San Francisco criteria and survival or tumor recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Although results of this study add some corroborative evidence in this special field of transplantation for malignancy, they also open the discussion about the prognostic power of the current listing criteria.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17964442     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.05.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  18 in total

1.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma on cirrhosis: strategies to avoid tumor recurrence.

Authors:  Marco Vivarelli; Andrea Risaliti
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Liver transplantation, liver resection, and transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: which is the best oncological approach?

Authors:  Georgios C Sotiropoulos; Nina Drühe; George Sgourakis; Ernesto P Molmenti; Susanne Beckebaum; Hideo A Baba; Gerald Antoch; Philip Hilgard; Arnold Radtke; Fuat H Saner; Silvio Nadalin; Andreas Paul; Massimo Malagó; Christoph E Broelsch; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma biological behavior in patient selection for liver transplantation.

Authors:  Umberto Cillo; Tommaso Giuliani; Marina Polacco; Luz Maria Herrero Manley; Gino Crivellari; Alessandro Vitale
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma from living-donor vs. deceased donor.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.293

5.  Predictors of Outcome of Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Hazem Mohamed Zakaria; Ahmed N Sallam; Islam I Ayoub; Sherif M Saleh; Doha Maher; Hazem Omar; Mohamed Abou-Shady; Ibrahim A Salama; El-Sayed A Soliman; Khaled Abou El-Ella; Tarek M Ibrahim; Essam M Hammad
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 0.656

6.  Validity of eleven prognostic scores with respect to intra- and extrahepatic recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation.

Authors:  A Bauschke; A Altendorf-Hofmann; H Kissler; A Koch; C Malessa; U Settmacher
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 7.  Living-donor vs deceased-donor liver transplantation for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Nobuhisa Akamatsu; Yasuhiko Sugawara; Norihiro Kokudo
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2014-09-27

8.  Alpha-fetoprotein level > 1000 ng/mL as an exclusion criterion for liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma meeting the Milan criteria.

Authors:  Bilal Hameed; Neil Mehta; Gonzalo Sapisochin; John P Roberts; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-07-12       Impact factor: 5.799

9.  Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis of factors predicting outcome in 1074 patients in OPTN Region 5.

Authors:  Brock Macdonald; Justin L Sewell; Ann M Harper; John P Roberts; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 10.  Living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer: an (almost) exclusive Eastern procedure?

Authors:  Rafael S Pinheiro; Daniel R Waisberg; Lucas S Nacif; Vinicius Rocha-Santos; Rubens M Arantes; Liliana Ducatti; Rodrigo B Martino; Quirino Lai; Wellington Andraus; Luiz A C D'Albuquerque
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-08-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.