Literature DB >> 17964235

Providing perinatal loss care: satisfying and dissatisfying aspects for midwives.

Jennifer Fenwick1, Belinda Jennings, Jill Downie, Janice Butt, Mayumi Okanaga.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: There is limited midwifery research that focuses on midwives experiences and attitudes to providing care for women who experience the death of a baby. There is also limited research investigating care components, and evidence to inform the basis of clinical practice in Australia and internationally. This paper presents the qualitative findings of a small study that aimed to investigate midwives experience, confidence and satisfaction with providing care for women who experienced perinatal loss. PROCEDURE: Eighty-three Western Australian midwives responded to an open ended question asking them to describe the most and least satisfying aspects of their role when providing care to women who experienced a perinatal loss. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.
FINDINGS: The analysis revealed that Australian midwives gained most satisfaction from providing skilled midwifery care that they considered made a difference to women. This was enabled when midwives were afforded the opportunity to provide continuity of midwifery carer to women throughout the labour, birth and early postnatal period. In terms of the least satisfying aspects of care, midwives identified that they struggled with the emotional commitment needed to provide perinatal loss care, as well as with how to communicate openly and share information with women. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Within the context of the study setting, midwifery care for women following perinatal loss reflects the care components espoused in the literature. There are, however, organisational issues within health care that require commitment to continuity of care and further education of practitioners to enhance outcomes for clients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17964235     DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2007.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Birth        ISSN: 1871-5192            Impact factor:   3.172


  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents' and healthcare professionals' experiences.

Authors:  Alison Ellis; Caroline Chebsey; Claire Storey; Stephanie Bradley; Sue Jackson; Vicki Flenady; Alexander Heazell; Dimitrios Siassakos
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-01-25       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Prioritization of interventions in pursuit of maternal health policy objectives to mitigate stillbirth risks. An exploratory qualitative study at subnational level in Uganda.

Authors:  Eric Ssegujja; Isaac Ddumba; Michelle Andipartin
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Perinatal Bereavement Care Confidence Scale (C-PBCCS) in nursing practice.

Authors:  Jialu Qian; Honghe Wu; Shiwen Sun; Man Wang; Xiaoyan Yu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.