Literature DB >> 17964193

The creation of the optimal dedicated endovascular suite.

C J J M Sikkink1, M M P J Reijnen, C J Zeebregts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During the last decade endovascular therapy has been established as an alternative treatment for a variety of vascular diseases. Neither the classic operating room (OR), nor the conventional angiography suite is optimal for both open surgery and endovascular procedures. Important issues include: quality of the imaging equipment, radiation burden, ease of use of the equipment, need for specially trained personnel, ergonomics, ability to perform both open and percutaneous procedures, sterile environments, as well as quality and efficiency of patient care.
METHODS: A literature search identified articles pertinent to the key issues during the decision-making process of creating the optimal endovascular suite. Manual cross-referencing also was performed. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSION: The most important feature of working in a dedicated endovascular suite should be the ability to attain best treatment of vascular patients. Whether the interventional radiologist or the vascular surgeon uses the facilities is of less importance. A fixed fluoroscopy unit is preferred, above a portable C-arm. Establishment of an endovascular operating room suite has the benefit of a sterile environment, the possibility of performing hybrid procedures and conversions when necessary. Moreover, angiography immediately before treatment gives contemporary anatomical information, and after treatment provides quality control. As a consequence, better quality and service can be provided to the individual patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17964193     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg        ISSN: 1078-5884            Impact factor:   7.069


  6 in total

1.  Combined common femoral artery endarterectomy with superficial femoral artery stenting plus Shuxuening Injection infusion for chronic lower extremity ischemia: 3-year results.

Authors:  Hai Feng; Xue-ming Chen; Chen-yu Li; Ren-ming Zhu; Jie Fang; Tian-you Wang
Journal:  Chin J Integr Med       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 1.978

2.  Hybrid theatres: nicety or necessity?

Authors:  Mark L Field; John Sammut; Manoj Kuduvalli; Aung Oo; Abbas Rashid
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Comparative ergonomic workflow and user experience analysis of MRI versus fluoroscopy-guided vascular interventions: an iliac angioplasty exemplar case study.

Authors:  Fabiola Fernández-Gutiérrez; Santiago Martínez; Martin A Rube; Benjamin F Cox; Mahsa Fatahi; Kenneth C Scott-Brown; J Graeme Houston; Helen McLeod; Richard D White; Karen French; Mariana Gueorguieva; Erwin Immel; Andreas Melzer
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  [Hybrid operating rooms versus conventional operating rooms : Economic comparisons in vascular surgery using the example of endovascular aneurysm repair].

Authors:  N Attigah; S Demirel; M Hakimi; H Bruijnen; O Schöffski; A Müller; U Geis; D Böckler
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 5.  Ergonomics in Interventional Radiology: Awareness Is Mandatory.

Authors:  Francois H Cornelis; Leo Razakamanantsoa; Mohamed Ben Ammar; Raphael Lehrer; Idriss Haffaf; Sanaa El-Mouhadi; Francois Gardavaud; Milan Najdawi; Matthias Barral
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 2.430

6.  Comparison of contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography angiography and splenoportography for the evaluation of portosystemic-shunt occlusion after cellophane banding in dogs.

Authors:  Sebastian Schaub; Antje Hartmann; Tobias Schwarz; Karsten Kemper; Kerstin H Pueckler; Matthias A Schneider
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 2.741

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.