Literature DB >> 17964130

Towards an 18S phylogeny of hexapods: accounting for group-specific character covariance in optimized mixed nucleotide/doublet models.

Bernhard Misof1, Oliver Niehuis, Inge Bischoff, Andreas Rickert, Dirk Erpenbeck, Arnold Staniczek.   

Abstract

The phylogenetic diversification of Hexapoda is still not fully understood. Morphological and molecular analyses have resulted in partly contradicting hypotheses. In molecular analyses, 18S sequences are the most frequently employed, but it appears that 18S sequences do not contain enough phylogenetic signals to resolve basal relationships of hexapod lineages. Until recently, character interdependence in these data has never been treated seriously, though possibly accounting for the occurrence of biased results. However, software packages are readily available which can incorporate information on character interdependence within a Bayesian approach. Accounting for character covariation derived from a hexapod consensus secondary structure model and applying mixed DNA/RNA substitution models, our Bayesian analysis of 321 hexapod sequences yielded a partly robust tree that depicts many hexapod relationships congruent with morphological considerations. It appears that the application of mixed DNA/RNA models removes many of the anomalies seen in previous studies. We focus on basal hexapod relationships for which unambiguous results are missing. In particular, the strong support for a "Chiastomyaria" clade (Ephemeroptera+Neoptera) obtained in Kjer's [2004. Aligned 18S and insect phylogeny. Syst. Biol. 53, 1-9] study of 18S sequences could not be confirmed by our analysis. The hexapod tree can be rooted with monophyletic Entognatha but not with a clade Ellipura (Collembola+Protura). Compared to previously published contributions, accounting for character interdependence in analyses of rRNA data presents an improvement of phylogenetic resolution. We suggest that an integration of explicit clade-specific rRNA structural refinements is not only possible but an important step in the optimization of substitution models dealing with rRNA data.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17964130     DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2007.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  18 in total

1.  Development of Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  Siegfried Roth; Volker Hartenstein
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  Fine structure of the midgut epithelium in two Archaeognatha, Lepismachilis notata and Machilis hrabei (Insecta), in relation to its degeneration and regeneration.

Authors:  Magdalena M Rost-Roszkowska; Petr Jansta; Jitka Vilimova
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 3.  Progress, pitfalls and parallel universes: a history of insect phylogenetics.

Authors:  Karl M Kjer; Chris Simon; Margarita Yavorskaya; Rolf G Beutel
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  What is the phylogenetic signal limit from mitogenomes? The reconciliation between mitochondrial and nuclear data in the Insecta class phylogeny.

Authors:  Gerard Talavera; Roger Vila
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  The complete mitochondrial genome of the cockroach Eupolyphaga sinensis (Blattaria: Polyphagidae) and the phylogenetic relationships within the Dictyoptera.

Authors:  Yan-yan Zhang; Wen-juan Xuan; Jin-liang Zhao; Chao-dong Zhu; Guo-fang Jiang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  Transcriptome analysis of reproductive tissue and intrauterine developmental stages of the tsetse fly (Glossina morsitans morsitans).

Authors:  Geoffrey M Attardo; José Mc Ribeiro; Yineng Wu; Matthew Berriman; Serap Aksoy
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Parametric and non-parametric masking of randomness in sequence alignments can be improved and leads to better resolved trees.

Authors:  Patrick Kück; Karen Meusemann; Johannes Dambach; Birthe Thormann; Björn M von Reumont; Johann W Wägele; Bernhard Misof
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 3.172

8.  Can comprehensive background knowledge be incorporated into substitution models to improve phylogenetic analyses? A case study on major arthropod relationships.

Authors:  Björn M von Reumont; Karen Meusemann; Nikolaus U Szucsich; Emiliano Dell'Ampio; Vivek Gowri-Shankar; Daniela Bartel; Sabrina Simon; Harald O Letsch; Roman R Stocsits; Yun-xia Luan; Johann Wolfgang Wägele; Günther Pass; Heike Hadrys; Bernhard Misof
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Insect phylogenomics: exploring the source of incongruence using new transcriptomic data.

Authors:  Sabrina Simon; Apurva Narechania; Rob Desalle; Heike Hadrys
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  Increasing 28 mitogenomes of Ephemeroptera, Odonata and Plecoptera support the Chiastomyaria hypothesis with three different outgroup combinations.

Authors:  Dan-Na Yu; Pan-Pan Yu; Le-Ping Zhang; Kenneth B Storey; Xin-Yan Gao; Jia-Yong Zhang
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.