Literature DB >> 17963950

Appropriate electrode placement site for electric pulp testing first molar teeth.

Jack Lin1, Nicholas Chandler, David Purton, Brian Monteith.   

Abstract

Twenty volunteers with first molars free of restorations and caries were recruited. One molar from each arch was selected, and rubber dam was applied. Seven sites on each crown were electric pulp tested 4 times with an Elements Diagnostic Unit, and lowest threshold responses were recorded. Data were analyzed with one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test at the .01 level. The lowest response for both the maxillary and mandibular teeth was with the probe on the mesiobuccal cusp tip. Other sites showed an increase in level from the mesiobuccal cuspal surface, mesiobuccal gingival surface, and the center of the supporting cusps (palatal of maxillary molar, buccal of mandibular molar). No significant difference in responses was found between male and female subjects; however, male subjects responded at higher thresholds than female subjects on all test sites except the mesiobuccal cusp tip. The optimum site for pulp testing first molars is the mesiobuccal cusp tip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17963950     DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endod        ISSN: 0099-2399            Impact factor:   4.171


  8 in total

1.  Evaluation of electric pulp test thresholds and correct probe tip placement site in developing incisors: a clinical study in 1200 teeth.

Authors:  I Turedi; A T Ulusoy
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2022-03-23

2.  Evaluation of threshold response and appropriate electrode placement site for electric pulp testing in fluorosed anterior teeth: An in vivo study.

Authors:  Harikumar Vemisetty; Amulya Vanapatla; Polavarapu Venkata Ravichandra; Surakanti Jayaprada Reddy; Rajani Punna; Srujana Chandragiri
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2016 May-Jun

3.  2% lidocaine versus 3% prilocaine for oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Ali Alsharif; Esam Omar; Al-Braa Badr Alolayan; Rayan Bahabri; Giath Gazal
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of three placement sites for the cold test in subjects amongst different age groups.

Authors:  Brenda Eréndida Castillo-Silva; Jorge Alejandro Alegría-Torres; Gabriel Alejandro Martínez-Castañón; Carlo Eduardo Medina-Solís; Norma Verónica Zavala-Alonso; Nereyda Niño-Martínez; Eva Concepción Aguirre-López; Nuria Patiño-Marín
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  Pulp sensitivity changes during orthodontic treatment at different time periods: a prospective study.

Authors:  Benjamín Briseño-Marroquín; Héctor López-Murillo; Robert Kuchen; Adán Casasa-Araujo; Thomas Gerhard Wolf
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Anesthetic efficacies of buccal with palatal injection versus buccal with intra-septal injection in permanent maxillary first molars of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Peecharat Areenoo; Chanika Manmontri; Nattakan Chaipattanawan; Papimon Chompu-Inwai; Manop Khanijou; Thongnard Kumchai; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-07-26

7.  Relationship between the difference in electric pulp test values and the diagnostic type of pulpitis.

Authors:  Huachao Sui; Yangyang Lv; Mo Xiao; Liwen Zhou; Feng Qiao; Jinxin Zheng; Cuicui Sun; Jieni Fu; Yufan Chen; Yimeng Liu; Jie Zhou; Ligeng Wu
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Articaine and mepivacaine buccal infiltration in securing mandibular first molar pulp anesthesia following mepivacaine inferior alveolar nerve block: A randomized, double-blind crossover study.

Authors:  Giath Gazal; Abdullah Muteb Alharbi; Khalid HidayatAllah Al-Samadani; Mohammad Dib Kanaa
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.