Literature DB >> 17963742

Cryopreservation of composite tissues and transplantation: preliminary studies.

Xiangdong Cui1, Dayong Y Gao, Betsy F Fink, Henry C Vasconez, Brian Rinker.   

Abstract

Despite advances in cryobiology, the reliable cryopreservation of complex tissues has not yet been achieved. This study evaluates the viability of cryopreserved composite flaps and demonstrates the feasibility of their transplantation. Epigastric flaps were harvested from male Lewis rats. 1.5M dimethyl sulfoxide (Me(2)SO) was used as the initial cryoprotectant agent (CPA). Samples were frozen at controlled rate to -140 degrees C and transferred to liquid nitrogen for at least two weeks. Hematoxylin and eosin (H/E) staining, MTT tetrazolium salt assay, and factor VIII immunostaining were used to evaluate the overall histology, epithelial viability, and vascular endothelial integrity, respectively, of cryopreserved flaps. For the in vivo phase, flaps were isotransplanted to 35 recipient animals, divided into three groups: fresh (n=10), perfused (n=8), and cryopreserved (n=17). Blood vessel patency was assessed via Doppler at 1, 7, and 60 days post-transplantation. For in vitro studies, cryopreserved samples (10/10) retained normal cell architecture and vascular endothelial integrity upon H/E and factor VIII staining. The viability index of cryopreserved composite flap skin (n=10) was 11.17+/-2.01, which was not significantly different from fresh controls (n=10, 12.15+/-1.32). All transplanted flaps in the fresh and perfusion groups survived with healthy color and hair growth at 60 days after operation. Survival in the cryopreserved group ranged from 2 to 60 days, with a mean of 12 days. These results demonstrate that the long term survival of cryopreserved composite tissue transplants is possible. Further studies are needed to refine protocols for the reliable cryopreservation of composite parts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17963742     DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2007.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cryobiology        ISSN: 0011-2240            Impact factor:   2.487


  4 in total

1.  Cryopreservation and the age of the allotransplant.

Authors:  Brian Rinker
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 2.500

Review 2.  Tissue conservation for transplantation.

Authors:  Nicco Krezdorn; Sotirios Tasigiorgos; Luccie Wo; Marvee Turk; Rachel Lopdrup; Harriet Kiwanuka; Thet-Su Win; Ericka Bueno; Bohdan Pomahac
Journal:  Innov Surg Sci       Date:  2017-08-08

3.  Dimethyl Sulfoxide is Less Effective in Immersing Cryopreserved Large Pieces of Tissue: A Rabbit Hind-Limb Model.

Authors:  Zexing Zhu; Lin Qiao; Fuzhou Liu; Jianping He; Xiang Rao; Shuming Zhang; Peifu Tang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2019-10-22

4.  Preoperative Cryopreservation Promotes Digital Survival after Digit Replantation.

Authors:  Yu Tian; Nan Li; Wei Wang; Lei Liu
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 2.238

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.