Literature DB >> 17962045

Imaging of amyloid plaques and cerebral glucose metabolism in semantic dementia and Alzheimer's disease.

Alexander Drzezga1, Timo Grimmer, Gjermund Henriksen, Isabelle Stangier, Robert Perneczky, Janine Diehl-Schmid, Chester A Mathis, William E Klunk, Julie Price, Steve DeKosky, Hans-Jürgen Wester, Markus Schwaiger, Alexander Kurz.   

Abstract

Semantic dementia (SD) is a rare clinical syndrome, assigned to the group of frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLD). Histopathological analysis has not revealed the deposition of amyloid plaques in the majority of SD cases, in contrast to dementia of the Alzheimer type (AD). However, based on clinical examination alone a reliable differentiation of the underlying pathology cannot be guaranteed, i.e. AD and SD may be confused in some cases. Our aim was to determine, whether AD and SD can be differentiated in vivo by means of amyloid plaque PET imaging. In groups of AD and SD patients, matched for gender, age and overall degree of cognitive impairment, cerebral glucose metabolism was examined with [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET and cerebral amyloid plaque density was assessed using [(11)C]6-OH-BTA-1 (PIB)-PET. A volume-of-interest analysis (VOI), using the cerebellum as a reference region, and voxel-based statistical group comparisons (SPM2) were carried out between the patient groups and matched groups of healthy controls. To control for a potential influence of atrophy on the PET findings, a correction of partial volume effects was performed. Characteristic patterns of hypometabolism could be demonstrated in both clinically defined AD and SD with some regional overlap and subtle differences (AD: bilateral posterior cingulate, temporoparietal and frontal cortex; SD: left>right polar temporal, frontal mesial cortex). Compared with healthy controls, significant [(11)C]PIB amyloid plaque tracer binding was observed only in patients with AD (in bilateral temporoparietal, frontal and posterior cingulate cortex and the precuneus) but not in SD. This difference in amyloid plaque deposition could be reproduced in direct statistical comparison of AD and SD and clearly extended the metabolic differences between the patient groups. These findings support the notion that SD can be diagnosed in vivo as a separate entity from AD using amyloid plaque imaging. In general, amyloid plaque PET may complement neuropsychological assessment regarding reliable differential diagnosis of AD and FTLD dementias based on characterization of underlying pathology and may improve the definition of individual prognosis and the selection of patients for scientific trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17962045     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  70 in total

Review 1.  Amyloid imaging as a biomarker for cerebral β-amyloidosis and risk prediction for Alzheimer dementia.

Authors:  William E Klunk
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.673

2.  Age-related metabolic profiles in cognitively healthy elders: results from a voxel-based [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography study with partial volume effects correction.

Authors:  P K Curiati; J H Tamashiro-Duran; F L S Duran; C A Buchpiguel; P Squarzoni; D C Romano; H Vallada; P R Menezes; M Scazufca; G F Busatto; T C T F Alves
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Positron emission tomography imaging in neurological disorders.

Authors:  Marios Politis; Paola Piccini
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PIB) and fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) PET in patients with Alzheimer disease, mild cognitive impairment, and healthy controls.

Authors:  D P Devanand; Arthur Mikhno; Gregory H Pelton; Katrina Cuasay; Gnanavalli Pradhaban; J S Dileep Kumar; Neil Upton; Robert Lai; Roger N Gunn; V Libri; Xinhua Liu; Ronald van Heertum; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 2.680

Review 5.  FDG-PET Contributions to the Pathophysiology of Memory Impairment.

Authors:  Shailendra Segobin; Renaud La Joie; Ludivine Ritz; Hélène Beaunieux; Béatrice Desgranges; Gaël Chételat; Anne Lise Pitel; Francis Eustache
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2015-08-30       Impact factor: 7.444

6.  Beta amyloid in Alzheimer's disease: increased deposition in brain is reflected in reduced concentration in cerebrospinal fluid.

Authors:  Timo Grimmer; Matthias Riemenschneider; Hans Förstl; Gjermund Henriksen; William E Klunk; Chester A Mathis; Tohru Shiga; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Alexander Kurz; Alexander Drzezga
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  fMRI activation changes during successful episodic memory encoding and recognition in amnestic mild cognitive impairment relative to cognitively healthy older adults.

Authors:  Mehul A Trivedi; Christopher M Murphy; Celine Goetz; Raj C Shah; John D E Gabrieli; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; David A Turner; Glenn T Stebbins
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 2.959

8.  Abeta amyloid and glucose metabolism in three variants of primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Gil D Rabinovici; William J Jagust; Ansgar J Furst; Jennifer M Ogar; Caroline A Racine; Elizabeth C Mormino; James P O'Neil; Rayhan A Lal; Nina F Dronkers; Bruce L Miller; Maria Luisa Gorno-Tempini
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 10.422

Review 9.  Using Pittsburgh Compound B for in vivo PET imaging of fibrillar amyloid-beta.

Authors:  Ann D Cohen; Gil D Rabinovici; Chester A Mathis; William J Jagust; William E Klunk; Milos D Ikonomovic
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2012

10.  Comparison of 18F-FDG and PiB PET in cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Val J Lowe; Bradley J Kemp; Clifford R Jack; Matthew Senjem; Stephen Weigand; Maria Shiung; Glenn Smith; David Knopman; Bradley Boeve; Brian Mullan; Ronald C Petersen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-05-14       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.