AIM: The TELEMAM trial aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and costs of telemedicine in conducting breast cancer multi-disciplinary meetings (MDTs). METHODS:Over 12 months 473 MDT patient discussions in two district general hospitals (DGHs) were cluster randomised (2:1) to the intervention of telemedicine linkage to breast specialists in a cancer centre or to the control group of 'in-person' meetings. Primary endpoints were clinical effectiveness and costs. Economic analysis was based on a cost-minimisation approach. RESULTS: Levels of agreement of MDT members on a scale from 1 to 5 were high and similar in both the telemedicine and standard meetings for decision sharing (4.04 versus 4.17), consensus (4.06 versus 4.20) and confidence in the decision (4.16 versus 4.07). The threshold at which the telemedicine meetings became cheaper than standard MDTs was approximately 40 meetings per year. CONCLUSION:Telemedicine delivered breast cancer multi-disciplinary meetings have similar clinical effectiveness to standard 'in-person' meetings.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The TELEMAM trial aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and costs of telemedicine in conducting breast cancer multi-disciplinary meetings (MDTs). METHODS: Over 12 months 473 MDT patient discussions in two district general hospitals (DGHs) were cluster randomised (2:1) to the intervention of telemedicine linkage to breast specialists in a cancer centre or to the control group of 'in-person' meetings. Primary endpoints were clinical effectiveness and costs. Economic analysis was based on a cost-minimisation approach. RESULTS: Levels of agreement of MDT members on a scale from 1 to 5 were high and similar in both the telemedicine and standard meetings for decision sharing (4.04 versus 4.17), consensus (4.06 versus 4.20) and confidence in the decision (4.16 versus 4.07). The threshold at which the telemedicine meetings became cheaper than standard MDTs was approximately 40 meetings per year. CONCLUSION: Telemedicine delivered breast cancer multi-disciplinary meetings have similar clinical effectiveness to standard 'in-person' meetings.
Authors: Christy L Marshall; Nancy J Petersen; Aanand D Naik; Nancy Vander Velde; Avo Artinyan; Daniel Albo; David H Berger; Daniel A Anaya Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 3.536
Authors: Patricia Breen; Kevin Murphy; Geraldine Browne; Fiona Molloy; Valerie Reid; Colin Doherty; Norman Delanty; Sean Connolly; Mary Fitzsimons Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2010-09-15 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: V Formica; E Fossile; R Pellegrino; M Fatale; M Mari; M Rabuffetti; F R Benedetto; G Visconti; E Bollero; M Roselli Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2008-12-17 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Richard J Lessells; Graham S Cooke; Nuala McGrath; Mark P Nicol; Marie-Louise Newell; Peter Godfrey-Faussett Journal: Trials Date: 2013-06-12 Impact factor: 2.279