Literature DB >> 17960776

Self-report versus interview assessment of purging in a community sample of women.

J M Mond1, P J Hay, B Rodgers, C Owen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Agreement between self-report and interview assessment of purging behaviours was examined in a community sample of women with a high level of eating disorder symptoms (n = 324) who completed both the Eating Disorder Examination (EDE) and Eating Disorder Examination Questionnaire (EDE-Q).
RESULTS: Of 46 individuals who reported any use of self-induced vomiting or laxative misuse on the questionnaire, 19 (41.7%) denied these behaviours when subsequently questioned in a face-to-face interview. These individuals had lower levels of eating disorder psychopathology, functional impairment and general psychological distress, than participants who reported purging on both the questionnaire and at interview (n = 27).
CONCLUSIONS: The assumption of interview superiority in the assessment of specific aspects of eating disorder psychopathology should not be uncritically accepted. Caution should be exercised in drawing conclusions concerning the level of agreement between self-report and interview assessment of purging based on research in clinical samples. 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and Eating Disorders Association

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17960776     DOI: 10.1002/erv.792

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Eat Disord Rev        ISSN: 1072-4133


  24 in total

1.  Convergence of scores on the interview and questionnaire versions of the Eating Disorder Examination: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kelly C Berg; Carol B Peterson; Patricia Frazier; Scott J Crow
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2011-09

2.  Screening for DSM-5 Other Specified Feeding or Eating Disorder in a Weight-Loss Treatment-Seeking Obese Sample.

Authors:  Andrea S Hartmann; Mark J Gorman; Stephanie Sogg; Evan M Lamont; Kamryn T Eddy; Anne E Becker; Jennifer J Thomas
Journal:  Prim Care Companion CNS Disord       Date:  2014-10-23

3.  A latent profile analysis of the typology of bulimic symptoms in an indigenous Pacific population: evidence of cross-cultural variation in phenomenology.

Authors:  J J Thomas; R D Crosby; S A Wonderlich; R H Striegel-Moore; A E Becker
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 7.723

4.  Evaluation of the DSM-5 severity indicator for bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Carlos M Grilo; Valentina Ivezaj; Marney A White
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2015-02-25

5.  Association between obesity and adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in a German community-based sample.

Authors:  Martina de Zwaan; Barbara Gruss; Astrid Müller; Alexandra Philipsen; Holmer Graap; Alexandra Martin; Heide Glaesmer; Anja Hilbert
Journal:  Obes Facts       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 3.942

6.  A controlled evaluation of the distress criterion for binge eating disorder.

Authors:  Carlos M Grilo; Marney A White
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  2011-08

7.  An exploratory examination of At-Risk/Problematic Internet Use and disordered eating in adults.

Authors:  Valentina Ivezaj; Marc N Potenza; Carlos M Grilo; Marney A White
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.913

8.  Significance of overvaluation of shape/weight in binge-eating disorder: comparative study with overweight and bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Carlos M Grilo; Robin M Masheb; Marney A White
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 5.002

9.  Smoking status and psychosocial factors in binge eating disorder and bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Ariana M Chao; Marney A White; Carlos M Grilo
Journal:  Eat Behav       Date:  2015-12-19

10.  Binge eating, purging, or both: eating disorder psychopathology findings from an internet community survey.

Authors:  Christina A Roberto; Carlos M Grilo; Robin M Masheb; Marney A White
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.