Literature DB >> 17959710

Constitutively active mutants of the histamine H1 receptor suggest a conserved hydrophobic asparagine-cage that constrains the activation of class A G protein-coupled receptors.

Remko A Bakker1, Aldo Jongejan, Kamonchanok Sansuk, Uli Hacksell, Henk Timmerman, Mark R Brann, Dave M Weiner, Leonardo Pardo, Rob Leurs.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to create and characterize constitutively active mutant (CAM) histamine H(1) receptors (H(1)R) using random mutagenesis methods to further investigate the activation process of the rhodopsin-like family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This approach identified position 6.40 in TM 6 as a "hot spot" because mutation of Ile6.40(420) either to Glu, Gly, Ala, Arg, Lys, or Ser resulted in highly active CAM H(1)Rs, for which almost no histamine-induced receptor activation response could be detected. The highly conserved hydrophobic amino acid at position 6.40 defines, in a computational model of the H(1)R, the asparagine cage motif that restrains the side chain of Asn7.49 of the NPxxY motif toward transmembrane domain (TM 6) in the inactive state of the receptor. Mutation of the asparagine cage into Ala or Gly, removing the interfering bulky constraints, increases the constitutive activity of the receptor. The fact that the Ile6.40(420)Arg/Lys/Glu mutant receptors are highly active CAM H(1)Rs leads us to suggest that a positively charged residue, presumably the highly conserved Arg3.50 from the DRY motif, interacts in a direct or an indirect (through other side chains or/and internal water molecules) manner with the acidic Asp2.50..Asn7.49 pair for receptor activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17959710     DOI: 10.1124/mol.107.038547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0026-895X            Impact factor:   4.436


  7 in total

1.  In silico analysis of the histaprodifen induced activation pathway of the guinea-pig histamine H(1)-receptor.

Authors:  Andrea Strasser; Hans-Joachim Wittmann
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Identification of determinants required for agonistic and inverse agonistic ligand properties at the ADP receptor P2Y12.

Authors:  Philipp Schmidt; Lars Ritscher; Elizabeth N Dong; Thomas Hermsdorf; Maxi Cöster; Doreen Wittkopf; Jens Meiler; Torsten Schöneberg
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.436

3.  Computationally-predicted CB1 cannabinoid receptor mutants show distinct patterns of salt-bridges that correlate with their level of constitutive activity reflected in G protein coupling levels, thermal stability, and ligand binding.

Authors:  Kwang H Ahn; Caitlin E Scott; Ravinder Abrol; William A Goddard; Debra A Kendall
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2013-06-14

4.  Stabilized G protein binding site in the structure of constitutively active metarhodopsin-II.

Authors:  Xavier Deupi; Patricia Edwards; Ankita Singhal; Benjamin Nickle; Daniel Oprian; Gebhard Schertler; Jörg Standfuss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Leu128(3.43) (l128) and Val247(6.40) (V247) of CXCR1 are critical amino acid residues for g protein coupling and receptor activation.

Authors:  Xinbing Han; Souvenir D Tachado; Henry Koziel; William A Boisvert
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Analysis of Missense Variants in the Human Histamine Receptor Family Reveals Increased Constitutive Activity of E4106.30×30K Variant in the Histamine H1 Receptor.

Authors:  Xiaoyuan Ma; Marta Arimont Segura; Barbara Zarzycka; Henry F Vischer; Rob Leurs
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  The role of Cysteine 6.47 in class A GPCRs.

Authors:  Mireia Olivella; Gianluigi Caltabiano; Arnau Cordomí
Journal:  BMC Struct Biol       Date:  2013-03-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.