Literature DB >> 17959145

A nucleosome positioned by alpha2/Mcm1 prevents Hap1 activator binding in vivo.

Nobuyuki Morohashi1, Kumiko Nakajima, Daichi Kurihara, Yukio Mukai, Aaron P Mitchell, Mitsuhiro Shimizu.   

Abstract

Nucleosome positioning has been proposed as a mechanism of transcriptional repression. Here, we examined whether nucleosome positioning affects activator binding in living yeast cells. We introduced the cognate Hap1 binding site (UAS1) at a location 24-43 bp, 29-48 bp, or 61-80 bp interior to the edge of a nucleosome positioned by alpha2/Mcm1 in yeast minichromosomes. Hap1 binding to the UAS1 was severely inhibited, not only at the pseudo-dyad but also in the peripheral region of the positioned nucleosome in alpha cells, while it was detectable in a cells, in which the nucleosomes were not positioned. Hap1 binding was restored in alpha cells with tup1 or isw2 mutations, which caused the loss of nucleosome positioning. These results support the mechanism in which alpha2/Mcm1-dependent nucleosome positioning has a regulatory function to limit the access of transcription factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17959145      PMCID: PMC2131697          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.10.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  42 in total

1.  Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites.

Authors:  J D Anderson; J Widom
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2000-03-03       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  GCN5 dependence of chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activation by the GAL4 and VP16 activation domains in budding yeast.

Authors:  G A Stafford; R H Morse
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  SAGA is an essential in vivo target of the yeast acidic activator Gal4p.

Authors:  S R Bhaumik; M R Green
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Silenced chromatin is permissive to activator binding and PIC recruitment.

Authors:  E A Sekinger; D S Gross
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2001-05-04       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Hap1p photofootprinting as an in vivo assay of repression mechanism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Shimizu; Aaron P Mitchell
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.600

Review 6.  Transcription factor access to promoter elements.

Authors:  Randall H Morse
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 4.429

7.  Cell-type-dependent repression of yeast a-specific genes requires Itc1p, a subunit of the Isw2p-Itc1p chromatin remodelling complex.

Authors:  Cristina Ruiz; Victoria Escribano; Eulalia Morgado; María Molina; María J Mazón
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.777

8.  General transcription factors bind promoters repressed by Polycomb group proteins.

Authors:  A Breiling; B M Turner; M E Bianchi; V Orlando
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The S. cerevisiae SAGA complex functions in vivo as a coactivator for transcriptional activation by Gal4.

Authors:  E Larschan; F Winston
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Yeast Ume6p repressor permits activator binding but restricts TBP binding at the HOP1 promoter.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Shimizu; Keiko Takahashi; Teresa M Lamb; Heisaburo Shindo; Aaron P Mitchell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  5 in total

1.  The Cyc8-Tup1 complex inhibits transcription primarily by masking the activation domain of the recruiting protein.

Authors:  Koon Ho Wong; Kevin Struhl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Nucleosome-coupled expression differences in closely-related species.

Authors:  Yuanfang Guan; Victoria Yao; Kyle Tsui; Marinella Gebbia; Maitreya J Dunham; Corey Nislow; Olga G Troyanskaya
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2011-09-26       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Nucleosome-depleted regions in cell-cycle-regulated promoters ensure reliable gene expression in every cell cycle.

Authors:  Lu Bai; Gilles Charvin; Eric D Siggia; Frederick R Cross
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 12.270

4.  Role of the cell wall integrity and filamentous growth mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways in cell wall remodeling during filamentous growth.

Authors:  Barbara Birkaya; Abhiram Maddi; Jyoti Joshi; Stephen J Free; Paul J Cullen
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2009-06-05

5.  Telomeric repeats act as nucleosome-disfavouring sequences in vivo.

Authors:  Yuichi Ichikawa; Nobuyuki Morohashi; Yoshifumi Nishimura; Hitoshi Kurumizaka; Mitsuhiro Shimizu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 16.971

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.