Literature DB >> 17958966

The use and perceptions of routine health data: a qualitative study of four cancer network teams in England.

Dawn Wilkinson1, Susan Michie, Mark McCarthy.   

Abstract

Health service managers have been criticized for placing more emphasis on the collection of data than on their use for the improvement of care. The present study examined how routine aggregate data on cancer services are perceived by management teams and how such data are used to inform strategic decision-making and planning. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 19 members of four cancer network teams in England. The interviews were transcribed and thematically analysed independently by two researchers. Respondents said that routine aggregate data were not highly prioritized as an information resource, although their use had produced some beneficial impacts, such as reduced waiting times. Limited use of aggregate data appeared to relate to problems of accessibility, lack of resources to turn the data into meaningful information and service improving action, and poor data quality and relevance. These factors apparently lead to inability or reluctance to use routine data to monitor and improve cancer services at the network level. Data-user concerns should be addressed to facilitate greater use of available routine data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17958966     DOI: 10.1258/095148407782219058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res        ISSN: 0951-4848


  6 in total

1.  A focused ethnographic study of Alberta cattle veterinarians' decision making about diagnostic laboratory submissions and perceptions of surveillance programs.

Authors:  Kate Sawford; Ardene Robinson Vollman; Craig Stephen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Determining research knowledge infrastructure for healthcare systems: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Moriah E Ellen; John N Lavis; Mathieu Ouimet; Jeremy Grimshaw; Pierre-Olivier Bédard
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  General practitioners uses and perceptions of voluntary electronic feedback on treatment outcomes - a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maria Laura Lippert; Marius Brostrøm Kousgaard; Lars Bjerrum
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Barriers, facilitators and views about next steps to implementing supports for evidence-informed decision-making in health systems: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Moriah E Ellen; Grégory Léon; Gisèle Bouchard; Mathieu Ouimet; Jeremy M Grimshaw; John N Lavis
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 7.327

5.  A focused ethnographic study of Sri Lankan government field veterinarians' decision making about diagnostic laboratory submissions and perceptions of surveillance.

Authors:  Kate Sawford; Ardene Robinson Vollman; Craig Stephen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Use of comparative data for integrated cancer services.

Authors:  Dawn L Wilkinson; Mark McCarthy
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.