D Nashan1, M L Müller, S Grabbe, S Wustlich, A Enk. 1. Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany. dorothee.nashan@uniklinik-freiburg.de
Abstract
AIMS: In the metastatic stage, malignant melanoma is resistant to systemic treatment and carries a poor prognosis. A critical, evidence-based analysis of standard approaches based on an extended search of published literature and from different Internet sources is presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A critical, evidence-based analysis of standard approaches and their variations to systemic therapy based on an extended search of published literature and from different Internet sources is presented. Few meta-analyses are available. Therefore, assessment of therapies is mainly based on randomized multicentre studies or clinical studies achieving an evidence level grade 1 or 2. RESULTS: Monotherapy with DTIC (dacarbazine) is the standard. Based on overall survival data, polychemotherapies cannot be recommended. Combination of polychemotherapy with the cytokines interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 substantially augments chemotherapy induced response rates, but a meta-analysis for survival does not support its therapeutic superiority. Biological therapies such as vaccinations have not yet delivered results on a higher evidence level. Thus, immunotherapies as well as chemo-immunotherapies will have to be evaluated in further studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although the therapeutic efficacy is very limited, dacarbazine cannot be rejected as standard therapy for disseminated melanoma, because no other therapeutic regimen exhibits a survival benefit over DTIC in an evidence-based analysis. This lack of therapeutic progress over the past 40 years clearly calls for further clinical studies, and patients should be enrolled into clinical trials whenever possible.
AIMS: In the metastatic stage, malignant melanoma is resistant to systemic treatment and carries a poor prognosis. A critical, evidence-based analysis of standard approaches based on an extended search of published literature and from different Internet sources is presented. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A critical, evidence-based analysis of standard approaches and their variations to systemic therapy based on an extended search of published literature and from different Internet sources is presented. Few meta-analyses are available. Therefore, assessment of therapies is mainly based on randomized multicentre studies or clinical studies achieving an evidence level grade 1 or 2. RESULTS: Monotherapy with DTIC (dacarbazine) is the standard. Based on overall survival data, polychemotherapies cannot be recommended. Combination of polychemotherapy with the cytokines interferon-alpha and interleukin-2 substantially augments chemotherapy induced response rates, but a meta-analysis for survival does not support its therapeutic superiority. Biological therapies such as vaccinations have not yet delivered results on a higher evidence level. Thus, immunotherapies as well as chemo-immunotherapies will have to be evaluated in further studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although the therapeutic efficacy is very limited, dacarbazine cannot be rejected as standard therapy for disseminated melanoma, because no other therapeutic regimen exhibits a survival benefit over DTIC in an evidence-based analysis. This lack of therapeutic progress over the past 40 years clearly calls for further clinical studies, and patients should be enrolled into clinical trials whenever possible.
Authors: Mark B Faries; Anna Leung; Donald L Morton; Danielle Hari; Ji-Hey Lee; Myung-shin Sim; Anton J Bilchik Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2014-05-10 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Zhor Senhaji Mouhri; Elliot Goodfellow; Steven P Kelley; Robin S Stein; Robin D Rogers; Bertrand J Jean-Claude Journal: Molecules Date: 2017-07-19 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Lucia B Jilaveanu; Christopher R Zito; Saadia A Aziz; Patricia J Conrad; John C Schmitz; Mario Sznol; Robert L Camp; David L Rimm; Harriet M Kluger Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-09-08 Impact factor: 13.801