Literature DB >> 17958703

Gamma oscillations distinguish true from false memories.

Per B Sederberg1, Andreas Schulze-Bonhage, Joseph R Madsen, Edward B Bromfield, Brian Litt, Armin Brandt, Michael J Kahana.   

Abstract

To test whether distinct patterns of electrophysiological activity prior to a response can distinguish true from false memories, we analyzed intracranial electroencephalographic recordings while 52 patients undergoing treatment for epilepsy performed a verbal free-recall task. These analyses revealed that the same pattern of gamma-band (28-100 Hz) oscillatory activity that predicts successful memory formation at item encoding--increased gamma power in the hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, and left temporal lobe--reemerges at retrieval to distinguish correct from incorrect responses. The timing of these oscillatory effects suggests that self-cued memory retrieval begins in the hippocampus and then spreads to the cortex. Thus, retrieval of true, as compared with false, memories induces a distinct pattern of gamma oscillations, possibly reflecting recollection of contextual information associated with past experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17958703      PMCID: PMC2897900          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02003.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  23 in total

Review 1.  Medial temporal lobe activations in fMRI and PET studies of episodic encoding and retrieval.

Authors:  D L Schacter; A D Wagner
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  Functional-neuroanatomic correlates of recollection: implications for models of recognition memory.

Authors:  Itamar Kahn; Lila Davachi; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-04-28       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Mismaking memories: neural precursors of memory illusions in electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Thomas P Urbach; Sabine S Windmann; David G Payne; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2005-01

Review 4.  Memory and the hippocampus: a synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys, and humans.

Authors:  L R Squire
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Gamma-band synchronization in visual cortex predicts speed of change detection.

Authors:  Thilo Womelsdorf; Pascal Fries; Partha P Mitra; Robert Desimone
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Category-specific cortical activity precedes retrieval during memory search.

Authors:  Sean M Polyn; Vaidehi S Natu; Jonathan D Cohen; Kenneth A Norman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall.

Authors:  Franklin M Zaromb; Marc W Howard; Emily D Dolan; Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Michele Tully; Arthur Wingfield; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  The medial temporal lobe distinguishes old from new independently of consciousness.

Authors:  Sander M Daselaar; Mathias S Fleck; Steven E Prince; Roberto Cabeza
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Attention modulates gamma-band oscillations differently in the human lateral occipital cortex and fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  Catherine Tallon-Baudry; Olivier Bertrand; Marie-Anne Hénaff; Jean Isnard; Catherine Fischer
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Theta and gamma oscillations during encoding predict subsequent recall.

Authors:  Per B Sederberg; Michael J Kahana; Marc W Howard; Elizabeth J Donner; Joseph R Madsen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  63 in total

1.  The false memory syndrome: experimental studies and comparison to confabulations.

Authors:  M F Mendez; I A Fras
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  Separable prefrontal cortex contributions to free recall.

Authors:  Nicole M Long; Ilke Oztekin; David Badre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Interpreting semantic clustering effects in free recall.

Authors:  Jeremy R Manning; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2012-05-30

4.  Cholinergic blockade reduces theta-gamma phase amplitude coupling and speed modulation of theta frequency consistent with behavioral effects on encoding.

Authors:  Ehren L Newman; Shea N Gillet; Jason R Climer; Michael E Hasselmo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  What is remembered? Role of attention on the encoding and retrieval of hippocampal representations.

Authors:  Isabel A Muzzio; Clifford Kentros; Eric Kandel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Category-specific neural oscillations predict recall organization during memory search.

Authors:  Neal W Morton; Michael J Kahana; Emily A Rosenberg; Gordon H Baltuch; Brian Litt; Ashwini D Sharan; Michael R Sperling; Sean M Polyn
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 7.  Direct brain recordings fuel advances in cognitive electrophysiology.

Authors:  Joshua Jacobs; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  A context-based theory of recency and contiguity in free recall.

Authors:  Per B Sederberg; Marc W Howard; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Neural correlates of high-gamma oscillations (60-200 Hz) in macaque local field potentials and their potential implications in electrocorticography.

Authors:  Supratim Ray; Nathan E Crone; Ernst Niebur; Piotr J Franaszczuk; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Inter- and intra-individual covariations of hemodynamic and oscillatory gamma responses in the human cortex.

Authors:  Tino Zaehle; Ingo Fründ; Jeanette Schadow; Stefanie Thärig; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.