BACKGROUND: Effective T-cell depletion is a prerequisite for haploidentical peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation. This study was performed to investigate the performance of magnetic cell sorting-based direct large-scale T-cell depletion, which is an attractive alternative to standard PBPC enrichment procedures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs were harvested from 11 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical donors. T cells labeled with anti-CD3-coated beads were depleted with a commercially available magnetic separation unit (CliniMACS, Miltenyi Biotec) with either the Depletion 2.1 (D2.1, n=11) or the novel Depletion 3.1 (D3.1, n=12) program. If indicated, additional CD34+ selections were performed (n=6). Eleven patients received T-cell-depleted grafts after reduced-intensity conditioning. RESULTS: The median log T-cell depletion was better with the D2.1 compared to the D3.1 (log 3.6 vs. log 2.3, p<0.05) and was further improved by introducing an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-blocking step (log 4.5 and log 3.4, respectively). The D3.1 was superior to the D2.1 (p<0.05) in median recovery of CD34+ cells (90% vs. 78%) and in median recovery of CD3- cells (87% vs. 76%). The median processing times per 10(10) total cells were 0.90 hours (D2.1) and 0.35 hours (D3.1). The transplanted grafts (directly T-cell-depleted products with or without positively selected CD34+ cells) contained a median of 10.5 x 10(6) per kg CD34+, 0.93x10(5) per kg CD3+, and 11.6x10(6) per kg CD56+. Rapid engraftment was achieved in 10 patients. The incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease were less than 10 percent (Grade I/II) and 0 percent (Grade III/IV). CONCLUSION: The novel D3.1 program with IgG blocking enables highly effective, time-saving large-scale T-cell depletion. Combining direct depletion techniques with standard CD34+ selection enables the composition of grafts optimized to the specific requirements of the patients.
BACKGROUND: Effective T-cell depletion is a prerequisite for haploidentical peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) transplantation. This study was performed to investigate the performance of magnetic cell sorting-based direct large-scale T-cell depletion, which is an attractive alternative to standard PBPC enrichment procedures. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs were harvested from 11 human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical donors. T cells labeled with anti-CD3-coated beads were depleted with a commercially available magnetic separation unit (CliniMACS, Miltenyi Biotec) with either the Depletion 2.1 (D2.1, n=11) or the novel Depletion 3.1 (D3.1, n=12) program. If indicated, additional CD34+ selections were performed (n=6). Eleven patients received T-cell-depleted grafts after reduced-intensity conditioning. RESULTS: The median log T-cell depletion was better with the D2.1 compared to the D3.1 (log 3.6 vs. log 2.3, p<0.05) and was further improved by introducing an immunoglobulin G (IgG)-blocking step (log 4.5 and log 3.4, respectively). The D3.1 was superior to the D2.1 (p<0.05) in median recovery of CD34+ cells (90% vs. 78%) and in median recovery of CD3- cells (87% vs. 76%). The median processing times per 10(10) total cells were 0.90 hours (D2.1) and 0.35 hours (D3.1). The transplanted grafts (directly T-cell-depleted products with or without positively selected CD34+ cells) contained a median of 10.5 x 10(6) per kg CD34+, 0.93x10(5) per kg CD3+, and 11.6x10(6) per kg CD56+. Rapid engraftment was achieved in 10 patients. The incidences of acute graft-versus-host disease were less than 10 percent (Grade I/II) and 0 percent (Grade III/IV). CONCLUSION: The novel D3.1 program with IgG blocking enables highly effective, time-saving large-scale T-cell depletion. Combining direct depletion techniques with standard CD34+ selection enables the composition of grafts optimized to the specific requirements of the patients.
Authors: Hans-Georg Kopp; Stefan Wirths; Christoph Faul; Wolfgang Bethge; Stefan Scheding; Wolfram Brugger; Lothar Kanz; Wichard Vogel Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2010-03-09 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Josefina Dykes; Andreas Lenshof; Ing-Britt Åstrand-Grundström; Thomas Laurell; Stefan Scheding Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-08-09 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Daniel T MacLeod; Jeyaraj Antony; Aaron J Martin; Rachel J Moser; Armin Hekele; Keith J Wetzel; Audrey E Brown; Melissa A Triggiano; Jo Ann Hux; Christina D Pham; Victor V Bartsevich; Caitlin A Turner; Janel Lape; Samantha Kirkland; Clayton W Beard; Jeff Smith; Matthew L Hirsch; Michael G Nicholson; Derek Jantz; Bruce McCreedy Journal: Mol Ther Date: 2017-02-23 Impact factor: 11.454
Authors: Anke Urbansky; Andreas Lenshof; Josefina Dykes; Thomas Laurell; Stefan Scheding Journal: Micromachines (Basel) Date: 2016-06-09 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Sandra Jester; Julia Larsson; Erik A Eklund; Domniki Papadopoulou; Jan-Eric Månsson; Albert N Békássy; Dominik Turkiewicz; Jacek Toporski; Ingrid Øra Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2013-09-05 Impact factor: 4.123