Literature DB >> 17958490

The eyes remember it: oculography and pupillometry during recollection in three amnesic patients.

Bruno Laeng1, Knut Waterloo, Stein Harald Johnsen, Søren Jacob Bakke, Torstein Låg, Synnøve Steiro Simonsen, Jørgen Høgsaet.   

Abstract

Two patients (TC and SS) with lesions that included the hippocampal regions (predominantly on the left side) were severely impaired in their recall of simple, verbally stated facts. However, both patients remembered spatial information that was temporally associated with semantic information. Specifically, TC and SS could not recall explicitly the content of an episode, but their spontaneous oculomotor behavior showed that they retained some information about the event as their gaze automatically returned to the locations on the computer screen where visual information had been paired to verbally presented information. Thus, this spatial information is implicit, automatically retrieved, and eye-based, as when one patient (TC) was asked to point with the finger to the same positions he was impaired. In addition, in an old/new recognition task, TC and SS and an additional patient, OB, showed significant changes in eye pupil diameter when viewing novel visual stimuli compared to stimuli that they had previously seen, also when they (incorrectly) declared with confidence that an old item was new. The spared memory of these patients, despite severe amnesia for the learning episodes, is characterized by a re-enactment of previous eye fixations that were associated with each (forgotten) episode and physiological responses (as indexed by pupillometry) to previously seen stimuli. Such spared memory can be seen as a type of "snapshot" memory, which automatically processes eye-based spatial information and whose content remains implicit. Finally, we surmise on the basis of the neuroanatomical findings of these patients, that neural substrates in the spared (right) hemisphere might support both the eye fixations' re-enactment and implicit visual pattern recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17958490     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.11.1888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  Pupil Dilation Reflects the Creation and Retrieval of Memories.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Megan H Papesh
Journal:  Curr Dir Psychol Sci       Date:  2012-03-20

2.  Vocal acoustic analysis as a biometric indicator of information processing: implications for neurological and psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Alex S Cohen; Thomas J Dinzeo; Neila J Donovan; Caitlin E Brown; Sean C Morrison
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 3.222

3.  Experience-dependent eye movements reflect hippocampus-dependent (aware) memory.

Authors:  Christine N Smith; Larry R Squire
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-26       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Expecting Questions Modulates Cognitive Effort in a Syntactic Processing Task: Evidence From Pupillometry.

Authors:  Laura Roche Chapman; Brooke Hallowell
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Pupillary Stroop effects.

Authors:  Bruno Laeng; Marte Ørbo; Terje Holmlund; Michele Miozzo
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-09-24

6.  Task-evoked pupillometry provides a window into the development of short-term memory capacity.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Johnson; Alison T Miller Singley; Andrew D Peckham; Sheri L Johnson; Silvia A Bunge
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-03-13

7.  The pupillary response discriminates between subjective and objective familiarity and novelty.

Authors:  Alexandros Kafkas; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Gaze direction reveals implicit item and source memory in older adults.

Authors:  Inés Antón-Méndez; Andrew Talk; Simone Johnston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.