Literature DB >> 17958148

Objective age of acquisition norms for a set of 328 words in Spanish.

Bernardo Alvarez1, Fernando Cuetos.   

Abstract

Age of acquisition is one of the most important variables in picture naming. For this reason, a large number of findings concerning age-of-acquisition data have been published in recent years in a number of different languages. In this article, objective age-of-acquisition data in Spanish for 328 pictures were collected from a pool of 760 children, half of whom were boys and the other half girls. A total of 246 pictures were selected from the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) set, and 82 were new pictures. Like the results of other studies, we found that objective age of acquisition correlates less than rated age of acquisition with familiarity and frequency, which indicates that the objective measure is less contaminated by other variables than are rated estimates. A very high correlation was obtained between the norms from this study and those published in English, French, Icelandic, and Italian. These norms will be very useful to Spanish psycholinguists and clinicians. Related materials may be downloaded from the Psychonomic Society Web archive at www.psychonomic.org/archive/.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17958148     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  10 in total

1.  Lexical and semantic age-of-acquisition effects on word naming in Spanish.

Authors:  Robert Davies; Analia Barbón; Fernando Cuetos
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-02

2.  Thai Norms for Name, Image, and Category Agreement, Object Familiarity, Visual Complexity, Manipulability, and Age of Acquisition for 480 Color Photographic Objects.

Authors:  A J Benjamin Clarke; Jason D Ludington
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-06

3.  The semantic organization of the animal category: evidence from semantic verbal fluency and network theory.

Authors:  Joaquín Goñi; Gonzalo Arrondo; Jorge Sepulcre; Iñigo Martincorena; Nieves Vélez de Mendizábal; Bernat Corominas-Murtra; Bartolomé Bejarano; Sergio Ardanza-Trevijano; Herminia Peraita; Dennis P Wall; Pablo Villoslada
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2010-10-12

4.  Age of Exposure 2.0: Estimating word complexity using iterative models of word embeddings.

Authors:  Robert-Mihai Botarleanu; Mihai Dascalu; Micah Watanabe; Scott Andrew Crossley; Danielle S McNamara
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-02-15

5.  Corpus-based age of word acquisition: Does it support the validity of adult age-of-acquisition ratings?

Authors:  Filip Smolík; Maroš Filip
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.752

6.  The Bank of Standardized Stimuli (BOSS), a new set of 480 normative photos of objects to be used as visual stimuli in cognitive research.

Authors:  Mathieu B Brodeur; Emmanuelle Dionne-Dostie; Tina Montreuil; Martin Lepage
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Objective ages of acquisition for 3300+ simplified Chinese characters.

Authors:  Zhenguang G Cai; Shuting Huang; Zebo Xu; Nan Zhao
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2021-06-22

8.  Timed picture naming norms for Mandarin Chinese.

Authors:  Youyi Liu; Meiling Hao; Ping Li; Hua Shu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An ecological alternative to Snodgrass & Vanderwart: 360 high quality colour images with norms for seven psycholinguistic variables.

Authors:  Francisco Javier Moreno-Martínez; Pedro R Montoro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Age of acquisition of 299 words in seven languages: American English, Czech, Gaelic, Lebanese Arabic, Malay, Persian and Western Armenian.

Authors:  Magdalena Łuniewska; Zofia Wodniecka; Carol A Miller; Filip Smolík; Morna Butcher; Vasiliki Chondrogianni; Edith Kouba Hreich; Camille Messarra; Rogayah A Razak; Jeanine Treffers-Daller; Ngee Thai Yap; Layal Abboud; Ali Talebi; Maribel Gureghian; Laurice Tuller; Ewa Haman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.