RATIONALE: Patterns of drug self-administration are often highly regular, with a consistent pause after each self-injection. This pausing might occur because the animal has learned that additional injections are not reinforcing once the drug effect has reached a certain level, possibly due to the reinforcement system reaching full capacity. Thus, interoceptive effects of the drug might function as a discriminative stimulus, signaling when additional drug will be reinforcing and when it will not. OBJECTIVE: This hypothetical stimulus control aspect of drug self-administration was emulated using a schedule of food reinforcement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Rats' nose-poke responses produced food only when a cue light was present. No drug was administered at any time. However, the state of the light stimulus was determined by calculating what the whole-body drug level would have been if each response in the session had produced a drug injection. The light was only presented while this virtual drug level was below a specific threshold. A range of doses of cocaine and remifentanil were emulated using parameters based on previous self-administration experiments. RESULTS: Response patterns were highly regular, dose-dependent, and remarkably similar to actual drug self-administration. CONCLUSION: This similarity suggests that the emulation schedule may provide a reasonable model of the contingencies inherent in drug reinforcement. Thus, these results support a stimulus control account of regulated drug intake in which rats learn to discriminate when the level of drug effect has fallen to a point where another self-injection will be reinforcing.
RATIONALE: Patterns of drug self-administration are often highly regular, with a consistent pause after each self-injection. This pausing might occur because the animal has learned that additional injections are not reinforcing once the drug effect has reached a certain level, possibly due to the reinforcement system reaching full capacity. Thus, interoceptive effects of the drug might function as a discriminative stimulus, signaling when additional drug will be reinforcing and when it will not. OBJECTIVE: This hypothetical stimulus control aspect of drug self-administration was emulated using a schedule of food reinforcement. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Rats' nose-poke responses produced food only when a cue light was present. No drug was administered at any time. However, the state of the light stimulus was determined by calculating what the whole-body drug level would have been if each response in the session had produced a drug injection. The light was only presented while this virtual drug level was below a specific threshold. A range of doses of cocaine and remifentanil were emulated using parameters based on previous self-administration experiments. RESULTS: Response patterns were highly regular, dose-dependent, and remarkably similar to actual drug self-administration. CONCLUSION: This similarity suggests that the emulation schedule may provide a reasonable model of the contingencies inherent in drug reinforcement. Thus, these results support a stimulus control account of regulated drug intake in which rats learn to discriminate when the level of drug effect has fallen to a point where another self-injection will be reinforcing.
Authors: Jose A Crespo; Leigh V Panlilio; Charles W Schindler; Katja Sturm; Alois Saria; Gerald Zernig Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: Bastian Stippekohl; Bertram Walter; Markus H Winkler; Ronald F Mucha; Paul Pauli; Dieter Vaitl; Rudolf Stark Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2012-04-03 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Bastian Stippekohl; Markus Winkler; Ronald F Mucha; Paul Pauli; Bertram Walter; Dieter Vaitl; Rudolf Stark Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2010-01-20 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Charles W Schindler; Joanne P Gilman; Leigh V Panlilio; David J McCann; Steven R Goldberg Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Leigh V Panlilio; Zuzana Justinova; Paola Mascia; Marco Pistis; Antonio Luchicchi; Salvatore Lecca; Chanel Barnes; Godfrey H Redhi; Jordan Adair; Stephen J Heishman; Sevil Yasar; Mano Aliczki; Jozsef Haller; Steven R Goldberg Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2012-03-28 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Leigh V Panlilio; Maria E Secci; Charles W Schindler; Charles W Bradberry Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 4.530