Literature DB >> 17957179

Considerations for determining optimal mouse caging density.

Charmaine Foltz1, Larry Carbone, David DeLong, Bernard E Rollin, Pascalle Van Loo, Julia Whitaker, Axel Wolff.   

Abstract

At the 2006 National Meeting of the American Association of Laboratory Animal Science, a panel discussed the question of what constitutes optimal or acceptable housing density for mice. Though there is a consensus that present guidelines are somewhat arbitrarily defined, scientific research has not yet been able to provide clear recommendations for amending them. Speakers explored the many factors that influence decisions on mouse housing, including regulatory requirements, scientific data and their interpretation, financial considerations and ethical concerns. The panel largely agreed that animal well-being should be the measure of interest in evaluating housing density and that well-being includes not only physical health, but also animals' behavior, productivity and preference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17957179     DOI: 10.1038/laban1107-40

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lab Anim (NY)        ISSN: 0093-7355            Impact factor:   12.625


  9 in total

1.  The response of C57BL/6J and BALB/cJ mice to increased housing density.

Authors:  Charmaine Foltz; David DeLong
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Effects of cage density, sanitation frequency, and bedding type on animal wellbeing and health and cage environment in mice and rats.

Authors:  Mandy J Horn; Shanice V Hudson; Linda A Bostrom; Dale M Cooper
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 1.232

3.  Ethical and IACUC Considerations Regarding Analgesia and Pain Management in Laboratory Rodents.

Authors:  Larry Carbone
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 0.982

4.  The effects of particulate matters inhalation exposures of prallethrin and d-phenothrin mixture in mice (Mus musculus) against exhaled carbon dioxide concentration.

Authors:  Indri Santiasih; Harmin Sulistiyaning Titah; Joni Hermana
Journal:  Toxicol Res       Date:  2019-12-02

5.  Oral gavage in rats: animal welfare evaluation.

Authors:  Patricia V Turner; Elizabeth Vaughn; Janet Sunohara-Neilson; Jelena Ovari; Francesco Leri
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  Long-Term Provision of Environmental Resources Alters Behavior but not Physiology or Neuroanatomy of Male and Female BALB/c and C57BL/6 Mice.

Authors:  Amy E Clipperton-Allen; Joelle C Ingrao; Laura Ruggiero; Lucas Batista; Jelena Ovari; Jutta Hammermueller; John N Armstrong; Dorothee Bienzle; Elena Choleris; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.232

7.  Effects of Varied Housing Density on a Hybrid Mouse Strain Followed for 20 Months.

Authors:  Beverly Paigen; Joanne M Currer; Karen L Svenson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Recommended housing densities for research mice: filling the gap in data-driven alternatives.

Authors:  Karen L Svenson; Beverly Paigen
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 5.834

9.  Effects of housing density in five inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  Judith L Morgan; Karen L Svenson; Jeffrey P Lake; Weidong Zhang; Timothy M Stearns; Michael A Marion; Luanne L Peters; Beverly Paigen; Leah Rae Donahue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.