Literature DB >> 17956851

Maternal investment tactics in superb fairy-wrens.

A F Russell1, N E Langmore, J L Gardner, R M Kilner.   

Abstract

In cooperatively breeding species, parents often use helper contributions to offspring care to cut their own costs of investment (i.e. load-lightening). Understanding the process of load-lightening is essential to understanding both the rules governing parental investment and the adaptive value of helping behaviour, but little experimental work has been conducted. Here we report the results of field experiments to determine maternal provisioning rules in cooperatively breeding superb fairy-wrens (Malurus cyaneus). By manipulating carer: offspring ratios, we demonstrate that helpers allow females to reduce the rate at which they provision their brood. Female reductions, however, were less than that provided by helpers, so that chicks still received food at a faster rate in the presence of helpers. Despite this, chicks fed by parents and helpers were not heavier than those provisioned by parents alone. This is because maternal load-lightening not only occurs during the chick provisioning stage, but also at the egg investment stage. Theoretically, complete load-lightening is predicted when parents value themselves more highly than their offspring. We tested this idea by 'presenting' mothers with a 'choice' between reducing their own levels of care and increasing investment in their offspring. We found that mothers preferred to cut their contributions to brood care, just as predicted. Our experiments help to explain why helper effects on offspring success have been difficult to detect in superb fairy-wrens, and suggest that the accuracy with which theoretical predictions of parental provisioning rules are matched in cooperative birds depends on measuring maternal responses to helper presence at both the egg and chick stages.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17956851      PMCID: PMC2562397          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  8 in total

1.  Parents and helpers compensate for experimental changes in the provisioning effort of others in the Arabian babbler.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 2.844

2.  Dynamics of the caring family.

Authors:  Roger Härdling; Hanna Kokko; Kathryn E Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Reduced egg investment can conceal helper effects in cooperatively breeding birds.

Authors:  A F Russell; N E Langmore; A Cockburn; L B Astheimer; R M Kilner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-17       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The parental investment strategy of an avian cooperative breeder differs between a fragmented and an unfragmented landscape.

Authors:  Gary W Luck
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Cooperative breeding in mammals.

Authors:  M D Jennions; D W Macdonald
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 17.712

6.  Effects of helpers on juvenile development and survival in meerkats.

Authors:  T H Clutton-Brock; A F Russell; L L Sharpe; P N Brotherton; G M McIlrath; S White; E Z Cameron
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Can we measure the benefits of help in cooperatively breeding birds: the case of superb fairy-wrens Malurus cyaneus?

Authors:  Andrew Cockburn; Rachel A Sims; Helen L Osmond; David J Green; Michael C Double; Raoul A Mulder
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2008-02-25       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Escalation of a coevolutionary arms race through host rejection of brood parasitic young.

Authors:  Naomi E Langmore; Sarah Hunt; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-03-13       Impact factor: 49.962

  8 in total
  14 in total

Review 1.  Models of social evolution: can we do better to predict 'who helps whom to achieve what'?

Authors:  António M M Rodrigues; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Maternal effects in cooperative breeders: from hymenopterans to humans.

Authors:  Andrew F Russell; Virpi Lummaa
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Integrating Ecological and Evolutionary Context in the Study of Maternal Stress.

Authors:  Michael J Sheriff; Alison Bell; Rudy Boonstra; Ben Dantzer; Sophia G Lavergne; Katie E McGhee; Kirsty J MacLeod; Laurane Winandy; Cedric Zimmer; Oliver P Love
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Egg size investment in superb fairy-wrens: helper effects are modulated by climate.

Authors:  N E Langmore; L D Bailey; R G Heinsohn; A F Russell; R M Kilner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Kin selection, not group augmentation, predicts helping in an obligate cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  L E Browning; S C Patrick; L A Rollins; S C Griffith; A F Russell
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Manipulating carer number versus brood size: complementary but not equivalent ways of quantifying carer effects on offspring.

Authors:  A L Liebl; L E Browning; A F Russell
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 2.671

7.  Helpers and egg investment in the cooperatively breeding acorn woodpecker: testing the concealed helper effects hypothesis.

Authors:  Walter D Koenig; Eric L Walters; Joseph Haydock
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.980

8.  Maternal effects in relation to helper presence in the cooperatively breeding sociable weaver.

Authors:  Matthieu Paquet; Rita Covas; Olivier Chastel; Charline Parenteau; Claire Doutrelant
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Early growth, dominance acquisition and lifetime reproductive success in male and female cooperative meerkats.

Authors:  Sinead English; Elise Huchard; Johanna F Nielsen; Tim H Clutton-Brock
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  A limit on the extent to which increased egg size can compensate for a poor postnatal environment revealed experimentally in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.

Authors:  Matthew Schrader; Rachel M Crosby; Aimee R Hesketh; Benjamin J M Jarrett; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.