Literature DB >> 17956815

Assessment of tinnitus: measurement of treatment outcomes.

M B Meikle1, B J Stewart, S E Griest, W H Martin, J A Henry, H B Abrams, R McArdle, C W Newman, S A Sandridge.   

Abstract

There is a wide range of assessment techniques for tinnitus, but no consensus has developed concerning how best to measure either the presenting features of tinnitus or the effects of tinnitus treatments. Standardization of reliable and valid tinnitus measures would provide many advantages including improving the uniformity of diagnostic and screening criteria between clinics and facilitating comparison of treatment outcomes obtained at different sites. This chapter attempts to clarify issues involved in developing self-report questionnaires for the assessment of tinnitus. While the tinnitus questionnaires that are currently available provide valuable information on which to base diagnostic and screening decisions, they were not originally developed in such a way as to maximize their sensitivity to treatment-related changes in tinnitus. As a result, their construct validity for measuring treatment benefit has not received appropriate attention. In this paper, special emphasis is devoted to the use of effect sizes as an estimate of the ability of questionnaires (and their individual items) to measure changes associated with treatment. We discuss the criteria relevant to evaluating the effectiveness of a questionnaire for diagnostic purposes vs. for treatment-evaluation purposes, and we present a detailed illustration of how the various criteria have been applied in a recent questionnaire development effort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17956815     DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66049-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Brain Res        ISSN: 0079-6123            Impact factor:   2.453


  11 in total

1.  Readability of patient-reported outcome questionnaires for use with persons with swallowing disorders.

Authors:  Richard I Zraick; Samuel R Atcherson; Bonnie K Ham
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 3.438

2.  Changes over time of psychoacoustic outcome measurements are not a substitute for subjective outcome measurements in acute tinnitus.

Authors:  Sarah Rabau; Tony Cox; Andrea Kleine Punte; Brecht Waelkens; Annick Gilles; Kristien Wouters; Sebastien Janssens de Varebeke; Paul Van de Heyning
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Methodological aspects of clinical trials in tinnitus: a proposal for an international standard.

Authors:  Michael Landgrebe; Andréia Azevedo; David Baguley; Carol Bauer; Anthony Cacace; Claudia Coelho; John Dornhoffer; Ricardo Figueiredo; Herta Flor; Goeran Hajak; Paul van de Heyning; Wolfgang Hiller; Eman Khedr; Tobias Kleinjung; Michael Koller; Jose Miguel Lainez; Alain Londero; William H Martin; Mark Mennemeier; Jay Piccirillo; Dirk De Ridder; Rainer Rupprecht; Grant Searchfield; Sven Vanneste; Florian Zeman; Berthold Langguth
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.006

4.  Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Tinnitus Severity Short Form.

Authors:  Madelyn R Frumkin; Dorina Kallogjeri; Jay F Piccirillo; Eldre W Beukes; Vinaya Manchaiah; Gerhard Andersson; Thomas L Rodebaugh
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  Call for an Evidence-Based Consensus on Outcome Reporting in Tinnitus Intervention Studies.

Authors:  Alain Londero; Deborah A Hall
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2017-04-21

6.  Prevalence and severity of tinnitus in Polish otosclerosis patients qualified for stapes surgery.

Authors:  Beata Dziendziel; Piotr H Skarżyński; Joanna J Rajchel; Elżbieta Gos; Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Efficacy and safety of bilateral continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) for the treatment of chronic tinnitus: design of a three-armed randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Carola Arfeller; Reinhard Vonthein; Stefan K Plontke; Christian Plewnia
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Fluctuations in Subjective Tinnitus Ratings Over Time: Implications for Clinical Research.

Authors:  Jenny X Chen; Jonathon P Whitton; Aravindakshan Parthasarathy; Kenneth E Hancock; Daniel B Polley
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.619

9.  Psychometric properties of the Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI): Assessment in a UK research volunteer population.

Authors:  Kathryn Fackrell; Deborah A Hall; Johanna G Barry; Derek J Hoare
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for Patients With Acute Tinnitus.

Authors:  Li Li; Hao Shi; Min Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.