| Literature DB >> 17955563 |
Abstract
Recently, with the growth of statistical developments for competing risks analysis, some methods have been proposed to compute sample size in this context. These methods differ from a modelling approach: one is based on the Cox regression model for the cause-specific hazard, while another relies on the Fine and Gray regression model for the subdistribution hazard of a competing risk. In this work, we compare these approaches, derive a new sample size for comparing cumulative incidence functions when the hazards are not proportional (either cause-specific or subdistribution) and give practical advices to choose the approach best suited for the study question. Copyright (c) 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2007 PMID: 17955563 DOI: 10.1002/sim.3114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stat Med ISSN: 0277-6715 Impact factor: 2.373