Literature DB >> 17955149

The duplicate method of uncertainty estimation: are eight targets enough?

Jennifer A Lyn1, Michael H Ramsey, D Stephen Coad, Andrew P Damant, Roger Wood, Katy A Boon.   

Abstract

This paper presents methods for calculating confidence intervals for estimates of sampling uncertainty (s(samp)) and analytical uncertainty (s(anal)) using the chi-squared distribution. These uncertainty estimates are derived from application of the duplicate method, which recommends a minimum of eight duplicate samples. The methods are applied to two case studies--moisture in butter and nitrate in lettuce. Use of the recommended minimum of eight duplicate samples is justified for both case studies as the confidence intervals calculated using greater than eight duplicates did not show any appreciable reduction in width. It is considered that eight duplicates provide estimates of uncertainty that are both acceptably accurate and cost effective.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 17955149     DOI: 10.1039/b702691a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Analyst        ISSN: 0003-2654            Impact factor:   4.616


  2 in total

1.  Assessment of sampling and analytical uncertainty of trace element contents in arable field soils.

Authors:  Uwe Buczko; Rolf O Kuchenbuch; Walter Ubelhör; Ludwig Nätscher
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Heterogeneous areas-identification of outliers and calculation of soil sampling uncertainty using the modified RANOVA method.

Authors:  Sabina Dołęgowska; Agnieszka Gałuszka; Zdzisław M Migaszewski
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 2.513

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.