OBJECTIVE: To compare the various paediatric weight estimation methods (Advanced Pediatric Life Support, Broselow Tape, Argall, and Best Guess) and parental estimate to measured weight. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A convenience sample of children aged 1-11 years who presented to the emergency department over a 6 month period were eligible for inclusion. Data collected included height, age, ethnicity, parent estimate of weight and measured weight. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated. The outcome of interest was agreement between estimated weight and measured weight for each method. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and performance of each weight estimation method was compared using mean difference (MD), root mean square error (RMSE) and agreement within 10%. RESULTS: 410 cases were included in this study. The median age was 4 years, there were more boys (54.4%), and the majority of cases were of Caucasian ethnicity (74.9%). The mean BMI of the sample was 17 kg/m2 and mean actual weight was 21.2 kg. Parent estimate was the most accurate method with 78% of parent estimates within 10% of measured weight and the lowest mean difference (-0.6 kg) and RMSE (3.1 kg). The Broselow tape was the most accurate of the other methods, with 61% of estimations within 10% of measured weight. CONCLUSION: Parental estimation of weight is more accurate than the other weight estimation methods studied. When this is not available, the Broselow tape is the most accurate alternative method.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the various paediatric weight estimation methods (Advanced Pediatric Life Support, Broselow Tape, Argall, and Best Guess) and parental estimate to measured weight. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A convenience sample of children aged 1-11 years who presented to the emergency department over a 6 month period were eligible for inclusion. Data collected included height, age, ethnicity, parent estimate of weight and measured weight. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated. The outcome of interest was agreement between estimated weight and measured weight for each method. Data were analysed by descriptive statistics and performance of each weight estimation method was compared using mean difference (MD), root mean square error (RMSE) and agreement within 10%. RESULTS: 410 cases were included in this study. The median age was 4 years, there were more boys (54.4%), and the majority of cases were of Caucasian ethnicity (74.9%). The mean BMI of the sample was 17 kg/m2 and mean actual weight was 21.2 kg. Parent estimate was the most accurate method with 78% of parent estimates within 10% of measured weight and the lowest mean difference (-0.6 kg) and RMSE (3.1 kg). The Broselow tape was the most accurate of the other methods, with 61% of estimations within 10% of measured weight. CONCLUSION: Parental estimation of weight is more accurate than the other weight estimation methods studied. When this is not available, the Broselow tape is the most accurate alternative method.
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-10-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Nichole Ahlers; Anne Holmes; Krista Wright; Ann Harris; Jaylene Weigel; Talita Hill; Kim Baird; Marla Michaels; Gregory L Kearns Journal: J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther Date: 2013-04
Authors: Jennifer Christine Knight; Muhammad Nazim; Dale Riggs; Jane Channel; Charles Mullet; Richard Vaughan; Alison Wilson Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Maria E Moreira; Caleb Hernandez; Allen D Stevens; Seth Jones; Margaret Sande; Jason R Blumen; Emily Hopkins; Katherine Bakes; Jason S Haukoos Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2015-02-18 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: S Wirtz; C Eich; K Becke; S Brenner; A Callies; U Harding; C Höhne; F Hoffmann; J Kaufmann; B Landsleitner; H Marung; T Nicolai; F Reifferscheid; U Trappe; P Jung Journal: Anaesthesist Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 1.041
Authors: Allen D Stevens; Caleb Hernandez; Seth Jones; Maria E Moreira; Jason R Blumen; Emily Hopkins; Margaret Sande; Katherine Bakes; Jason S Haukoos Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 5.262