Literature DB >> 17954794

Maximizing informed cancer screening decisions.

Louise C Walter, Carmen L Lewis.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 17954794      PMCID： PMC3556453          DOI： 10.1001/archinte.167.19.2027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN： 0003-9926


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

1.  Screening mammography for frail older women: what are the burdens?

Authors:  L C Walter; C Eng; K E Covinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in the elderly: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Carmen L Lewis; Mary B Barton
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  Cancer screening in elderly patients: a framework for individualized decision making.

Authors:  L C Walter; K E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-06-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Informed choice in mammography screening: a randomized trial of a decision aid for 70-year-old women.

Authors:  Erin Mathieu; Alexandra Barratt; Heather M Davey; Kevin McGeechan; Kirsten Howard; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-22

Review 5.  Informed decision making: what is its role in cancer screening?

Authors:  Barbara K Rimer; Peter A Briss; Paula K Zeller; Evelyn C Y Chan; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  The effects of mammographic detection and comorbidity on the survival of older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Carol P McPherson; Karen K Swenson; Martin W Lee
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.562

7.  Relationship between health status and use of screening mammography and Papanicolaou smears among women older than 70 years of age.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Karla Lindquist; Kenneth E Covinsky
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Pitfalls of converting practice guidelines into quality measures: lessons learned from a VA performance measure.

Authors:  Louise C Walter; Natalie P Davidowitz; Paul A Heineken; Kenneth E Covinsky
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 56.272
  9 in total
  5 in total

1.  Developing and testing a decision aid for use by providers in making recommendations: about mammography screening in older women.

Authors:  Diana M Tisnado; Alison A Moore; Jennifer R Levin; Sonja Rosen
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2012-12-11

2.  Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: "I think it would be strange".

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Peter H Schwartz; Laura R Holtz; Kianna Montz; Greg A Sachs
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 21.873

3.  Caregiver perspectives on cancer screening for persons with dementia: "why put them through it?".

Authors:  Alexia M Torke; Peter H Schwartz; Laura R Holtz; Kianna Montz; Greg A Sachs
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 5.562

4.  Decision aid on breast cancer screening reduces attendance rate: results of a large-scale, randomized, controlled study by the DECIDEO group.

Authors:  Aurelie Bourmaud; Patricia Soler-Michel; Mathieu Oriol; Véronique Regnier; Fabien Tinquaut; Alice Nourissat; Alain Bremond; Nora Moumjid; Franck Chauvin
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-15

5.  "They Should Be Asking Us": A Qualitative Decisional Needs Assessment for Women Considering Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Brianne Wood; Virginia L Russell; Ziad El-Khatib; Susan McFaul; Monica Taljaard; Julian Little; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Glob Qual Nurs Res       Date:  2018-07-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.