C B Hall1, C Derby, A LeValley, M J Katz, J Verghese, R B Lipton. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1300 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY 10462, USA. chall@aecom.yu.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To test the cognitive reserve hypothesis by examining the effect of education on memory decline during the preclinical course of dementia. BACKGROUND: Low education is a well known risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD). Persons destined to develop AD experience an accelerated rate of decline in cognitive ability, particularly in memory. The cognitive reserve hypothesis predicts that persons with greater education begin to experience acceleration in cognitive decline closer to the time of diagnosis than persons with lower reserve, but that their rate of decline is more rapid after the time of acceleration due to increased disease burden. METHODS: We studied the influence of education on rates of memory decline as measured by the Buschke Selective Reminding Test in 117 participants with incident dementia in the Bronx Aging Study. Subjects had detailed cognitive assessments at entry and at annual follow-up visits. We estimated the time at which the rate of decline begins to accelerate (the change point), and the pre- and post-acceleration rates of decline, from the longitudinal data using a change point model. RESULTS: Each additional year of formal education delayed the time of accelerated decline on the Buschke Selective Reminding Test by 0.21 years. Post-acceleration, the rate of memory decline was increased by 0.10 points per year for each year of additional formal education. CONCLUSIONS: As predicted by the cognitive reserve hypothesis, higher education delays the onset of accelerated cognitive decline; once it begins it is more rapid in persons with more education.
OBJECTIVE: To test the cognitive reserve hypothesis by examining the effect of education on memory decline during the preclinical course of dementia. BACKGROUND: Low education is a well known risk factor for Alzheimer disease (AD). Persons destined to develop AD experience an accelerated rate of decline in cognitive ability, particularly in memory. The cognitive reserve hypothesis predicts that persons with greater education begin to experience acceleration in cognitive decline closer to the time of diagnosis than persons with lower reserve, but that their rate of decline is more rapid after the time of acceleration due to increased disease burden. METHODS: We studied the influence of education on rates of memory decline as measured by the Buschke Selective Reminding Test in 117 participants with incident dementia in the Bronx Aging Study. Subjects had detailed cognitive assessments at entry and at annual follow-up visits. We estimated the time at which the rate of decline begins to accelerate (the change point), and the pre- and post-acceleration rates of decline, from the longitudinal data using a change point model. RESULTS: Each additional year of formal education delayed the time of accelerated decline on the Buschke Selective Reminding Test by 0.21 years. Post-acceleration, the rate of memory decline was increased by 0.10 points per year for each year of additional formal education. CONCLUSIONS: As predicted by the cognitive reserve hypothesis, higher education delays the onset of accelerated cognitive decline; once it begins it is more rapid in persons with more education.
Authors: Joe Verghese; Emmeline Ayers; Nir Barzilai; David A Bennett; Aron S Buchman; Roee Holtzer; Mindy J Katz; Richard B Lipton; Cuiling Wang Journal: Neurology Date: 2014-10-31 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Michal Schnaider Beeri; Erin Moshier; James Schmeidler; James Godbold; Jaime Uribarri; Sarah Reddy; Mary Sano; Hillel T Grossman; Weijing Cai; Helen Vlassara; Jeremy M Silverman Journal: Mech Ageing Dev Date: 2011-11-03 Impact factor: 5.432
Authors: Jagan A Pillai; Charles B Hall; Dennis W Dickson; Herman Buschke; Richard B Lipton; Joe Verghese Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Brandon E Gavett; Al Ozonoff; Vlada Doktor; Joseph Palmisano; Anil K Nair; Robert C Green; Angela L Jefferson; Robert A Stern Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2010-04-07 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: R Scott Mackin; J Craig Nelson; Kevin L Delucchi; Patrick J Raue; Derek D Satre; Dimitris N Kiosses; George S Alexopoulos; Patricia A Arean Journal: Am J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 4.105
Authors: R Ryan Darby; Michael Brickhouse; David A Wolk; Bradford C Dickerson Journal: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-19 Impact factor: 10.154
Authors: Molly E Zimmerman; Marcelo E Bigal; Mindy J Katz; Adam M Brickman; Richard B Lipton Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2012-02-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Annie Robitaille; Ardo van den Hout; Robson J M Machado; David A Bennett; Iva Čukić; Ian J Deary; Scott M Hofer; Emiel O Hoogendijk; Martijn Huisman; Boo Johansson; Andriy V Koval; Maaike van der Noordt; Andrea M Piccinin; Judith J M Rijnhart; Archana Singh-Manoux; Johan Skoog; Ingmar Skoog; John Starr; Lisa Vermunt; Sean Clouston; Graciela Muniz Terrera Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-02-01 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: S D Israeli-Korn; M Masarwa; E Schechtman; A Abuful; R Strugatsky; S Avni; L A Farrer; R P Friedland; R Inzelberg Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 3.282