Literature DB >> 17953146

Eye movements and serial memory for visual-spatial information: does time spent fixating contribute to recall?

Jean Saint-Aubin1, Sébastien Tremblay, Annie Jalbert.   

Abstract

This research investigated the nature of encoding and its contribution to serial recall for visual-spatial information. In order to do so, we examined the relationship between fixation duration and recall performance. Using the dot task--a series of seven dots spatially distributed on a monitor screen is presented sequentially for immediate recall--performance and eye-tracking data were recorded during the presentation of the to-be-remembered items. When participants were free to move their eyes at their will, both fixation durations and probability of correct recall decreased as a function of serial position. Furthermore, imposing constant durations of fixation across all serial positions had a beneficial impact (though relatively small) on item but not order recall. Great care was taken to isolate the effect of fixation duration from that of presentation duration. Although eye movement at encoding contributes to immediate memory, it is not decisive in shaping serial recall performance. Our results also provide further evidence that the distinction between item and order information, well-established in the verbal domain, extends to visual-spatial information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17953146     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  7 in total

1.  The effects of task-relevant saccadic eye movements performed during the encoding of a serial sequence on visuospatial memory performance.

Authors:  Leonardo Martin; Anthony Tapper; David A Gonzalez; Michelle Leclerc; Ewa Niechwiej-Szwedo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The domain-specificity of serial order working memory.

Authors:  Yingxue Tian; Margaret E Beier; Simon Fischer-Baum
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-12-27

3.  Distance estimation is influenced by encoding conditions.

Authors:  Anna Oleksiak; Mirosława Mańko; Albert Postma; Ineke J M van der Ham; Albert V van den Berg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Overt is no better than covert when rehearsing visuo-spatial information in working memory.

Authors:  Richard Godijn; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

5.  Eye movements provide an index of veridical memory for temporal order.

Authors:  Thanujeni Pathman; Simona Ghetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  On-item fixations during serial encoding do not affect spatial working memory.

Authors:  Stefan Czoschke; Sebastian Henschke; Elke B Lange
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The eyes don't have it: Eye movements are unlikely to reflect refreshing in working memory.

Authors:  Vanessa M Loaiza; Alessandra S Souza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 3.752

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.