Literature DB >> 17953144

Predicting voting behavior with implicit attitude measures: the 2002 German parliamentary election.

Malte Friese1, Matthias Bluemke, Michaela Wänke.   

Abstract

Implicit measures of attitudes are commonly seen to be primarily capable of predicting spontaneous behavior. However, evidence exists that these measures can also improve the prediction of more deliberate behavior. In a prospective study we tested the hypothesis that Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures of the five major political parties in Germany would improve the prediction of voting behavior over and above explicit self-report measures in the 2002 parliamentary elections. Additionally we tested whether general interest in politics moderates the relationship between explicit and implicit attitude measures. The results support our hypotheses. Implications for predictive models of explicitly and implicitly measured attitudes are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17953144     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  9 in total

1.  Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.

Authors:  Livio Raccuia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Theta resting EEG in the right TPJ is associated with individual differences in implicit intergroup bias.

Authors:  Bastian Schiller; Lorena R R Gianotti; Thomas Baumgartner; Daria Knoch
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Does the discrepancy between implicit and explicit attitudes moderate the relationships between explicit attitude and (intention to) being physically active?

Authors:  Carolin Muschalik; Iman Elfeddali; Math J J M Candel; Rik Crutzen; Hein de Vries
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2019-08-07

4.  Mindfulness is not associated with dissonant attitudes but enhances the ability to cope with them.

Authors:  Carolin Muschalik; Rik Crutzen; Iman Elfeddali; Hein de Vries
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2020-04-10

5.  Do implicit attitudes predict actual voting behavior particularly for undecided voters?

Authors:  Malte Friese; Colin Tucker Smith; Thomas Plischke; Matthias Bluemke; Brian A Nosek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Controlled versus automatic processes: which is dominant to safety? The moderating effect of inhibitory control.

Authors:  Yaoshan Xu; Yongjuan Li; Weidong Ding; Fan Lu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?

Authors:  I-Ching Lee; Eva E Chen; Chia-Hung Tsai; Nai-Shing Yen; Arbee L P Chen; Wei-Chieh Lin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Choice Between Salary and Employer Brand: The Roles of Materialism and Inclination to Develop an Identity-Motives-Based Relationship With an Employer Brand.

Authors:  Małgorzata A Styśko-Kunkowska; Zuzanna Kwinta
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-03-27

9.  Temporal dynamics of resting EEG networks are associated with prosociality.

Authors:  Bastian Schiller; Tobias Kleinert; Sarah Teige-Mocigemba; Karl Christoph Klauer; Markus Heinrichs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.