Literature DB >> 17952673

Automatic habitat classification methods based on satellite images: a practical assessment in the NW Iberia coastal mountains.

R A Díaz Varela1, P Ramil Rego, S Calvo Iglesias, C Muñoz Sobrino.   

Abstract

Although remote sensing is increasingly in use for habitat mapping, traditional image classification methods tend to suffer shortcomings due to non-normality of spectral signatures, as well as overlapping and heterogeneity in radiometric responses of natural and semi natural vegetation. Methods using non-parametric classifiers and object-oriented analysis have been suggested as possible solutions for overcoming these limitations. In this paper, we aimed at evaluating the performance of some of these techniques for the European Natura 2000 network of protected areas habitats mapping. For this purpose, we tested different methods of supervised image classification in the Northern Mountains of Galicia, Spain, an area included in the Natura 2000 network, which is characterized by a highly heterogeneous landscape. Methods involved the use of maximum likelihood and nearest neighbour decision rules in per-pixel and per-object classification analyses on Landsat TM imagery. Per-object classifications were completed using the segment mean and segment means plus standard deviation feature spaces. The results showed the existence of significant differences in the accuracies for the different methodologies, their strengths and weaknesses and identified the most adequate approach for habitat mapping. Analyses pointed out that significant improvements in accuracy were achieved only under certain combinations of per-object analysis, non-parametric classifiers and high dimensionality feature space.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17952673     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-007-9981-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  4 in total

1.  Directions of change in land cover and landscape patterns from 1957 to 2000 in agricultural landscapes in NW Spain.

Authors:  María Silvia Calvo-Iglesias; Urbano Fra-Paleo; Rafael Crecente-Maseda; Ramón Alberto Díaz-Varela
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2006-10-12       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages.

Authors:  Q McNEMAR
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  1947-06       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.

Authors:  J R Landis; G G Koch
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment?

Authors:  Ronald J Feise
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2002-06-17       Impact factor: 4.615

  4 in total
  2 in total

1.  Use of object-oriented classification and fragmentation analysis (1985-2008) to identify important areas for conservation in Cockpit Country, Jamaica.

Authors:  Minke E Newman; Kurt P McLaren; Byron S Wilson
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Upland vegetation mapping using Random Forests with optical and radar satellite data.

Authors:  Brian Barrett; Christoph Raab; Fiona Cawkwell; Stuart Green
Journal:  Remote Sens Ecol Conserv       Date:  2016-11-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.