Literature DB >> 17952623

Effect of promoter driving selectable marker on corn transformation.

N Shiva Prakash1, V Prasad, Thillai P Chidambram, Shoba Cherian, T L Jayaprakash, Santanu Dasgupta, Qi Wang, Michael T Mann, T Michael Spencer, Raghava S Boddupalli.   

Abstract

Identification of an appropriate selection agent and its corresponding selectable marker gene is one of the first steps in establishing a transformation protocol for a given plant species. As the promoter controls expression level of the genes, the promoter driving the selectable marker gene can affect transformation. However, investigations into the direct effect of promoters driving selectable marker on transformation are lacking in the literature though many reports of relative strengths of promoters driving reporter genes like GUS or CAT or GFP are available. In the present study, we have compared rice Actin1 and CaMV.35S (commonly used promoters in monocotyledonous plant transformation) promoters driving nptII for their effectiveness in paromomycin selection of transgenic corn events. To enable statistically meaningful analysis of the results, a large sample size of nearly 5,000 immature embryos (explants) was employed producing approximately 1,250 independent events from each of the two constructs in four independent experiments. The rate of appearance of resistant calli and percentage of resistant calli recovered was higher with P-Os.Actin1/nptII/nos3' as compared to P-CaMV.35S/nptII/nos3' in all four experiments. There was no appreciable difference either in the frequency of plant regeneration or in the morphological characteristics of plants recovered from the two constructs. Although the escape rate trended lower with P-Os.Actin1 as compared to P-CaMV.35S, the recovery of low copy events was significantly higher with P-CaMV.35S. The higher transformation frequency with P-Os.Actin1 could be related to the strength of this promoter as compared to P-CaMV.35S in the explants and/or calli. Based on these results, we infer that the promoter driving the selectable marker is an important factor to be considered while establishing a high throughput transformation protocol as it could not only influence the transformation frequency but also the copy number of the transgene in the recovered transgenics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17952623     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-007-9149-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  26 in total

1.  Advances in the selection of transgenic plants using non-antibiotic marker genes.

Authors:  Morten Joersbo
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.500

Review 2.  Transgene silencing in monocots.

Authors:  L M Iyer; S P Kumpatla; M B Chandrasekharan; T C Hall
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  Resistance to hygromycin B : A new marker for plant transformation studies.

Authors:  C Waldron; E B Murphy; J L Roberts; G D Gustafson; S L Armour; S K Malcolm
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  High-efficiency transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana with a selectable marker gene regulated by the T-DNA 1' promoter.

Authors:  T Mengiste; P Amedeo; J Paszkowski
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.417

5.  Expression of bacterial genes in plant cells.

Authors:  R T Fraley; S G Rogers; R B Horsch; P R Sanders; J S Flick; S P Adams; M L Bittner; L A Brand; C L Fink; J S Fry; G R Galluppi; S B Goldberg; N L Hoffmann; S C Woo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Ubiquitin promoter-based vectors for high-level expression of selectable and/or screenable marker genes in monocotyledonous plants.

Authors:  A H Christensen; P H Quail
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.788

7.  A mutant neomycin phosphotransferase II gene reduces the resistance of transformants to antibiotic selection pressure.

Authors:  R L Yenofsky; M Fine; J W Pellow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The small, versatile pPZP family of Agrobacterium binary vectors for plant transformation.

Authors:  P Hajdukiewicz; Z Svab; P Maliga
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.076

9.  Glyphosate-tolerant CP4 and GOX genes as a selectable marker in wheat transformation.

Authors:  H Zhou; J W Arrowsmith; M E Fromm; C M Hironaka; M L Taylor; D Rodriguez; M E Pajeau; S M Brown; C G Santino; J E Fry
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.570

10.  Expression of a monocot LHCP promoter in transgenic rice.

Authors:  Y Tada; M Sakamoto; M Matsuoka; T Fujimura
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  10 in total

1.  Unprecedented enhancement of transient gene expression from minimal cassettes using a double terminator.

Authors:  Getu Beyene; Marco T Buenrostro-Nava; Mona B Damaj; San-Ji Gao; Joe Molina; T Erik Mirkov
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Enhanced single copy integration events in corn via particle bombardment using low quantities of DNA.

Authors:  Brenda A Lowe; N Shiva Prakash; Melissa Way; Michael T Mann; T Michael Spencer; Raghava S Boddupalli
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Marker-free transgenic corn plant production through co-bombardment.

Authors:  N Shiva Prakash; R Bhojaraja; S K Shivbachan; G G Hari Priya; T K Nagraj; V Prasad; V Srikanth Babu; T L Jayaprakash; Santanu Dasgupta; T Michael Spencer; Raghava S Boddupalli
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.570

4.  Induction of resistance to sugarcane mosaic virus by RNA interference targeting coat protein gene silencing in transgenic sugarcane.

Authors:  Suvia Widyaningrum; Dwi Ratna Pujiasih; Wardatus Sholeha; Rikno Harmoko; Bambang Sugiharto
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 2.316

5.  Characterization of a small constitutive promoter from Arabidopsis translationally controlled tumor protein (AtTCTP) gene for plant transformation.

Authors:  Yun-Jeong Han; Yong-Min Kim; Ok-Jin Hwang; Jeong-Il Kim
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  The Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and triticale (x Triticosecale Wittmack): role of the binary vector system and selection cassettes.

Authors:  Agnieszka Bińka; Wacław Orczyk; Anna Nadolska-Orczyk
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Advances in Maize Transformation Technologies and Development of Transgenic Maize.

Authors:  Pranjal Yadava; Alok Abhishek; Reeva Singh; Ishwar Singh; Tanushri Kaul; Arunava Pattanayak; Pawan K Agrawal
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Comparison of the impact of viral and plant-derived promoters regulating selectable marker gene on maize transformation and transgene expression.

Authors:  Jeffrey Beringer; Wei Chen; Russell Garton; Nagesh Sardesai; Po-Hao Wang; Ning Zhou; Manju Gupta; Huixia Wu
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.570

9.  Enhanced transgene expression in rice following selection controlled by weak promoters.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; Yong Yang; Xuming Wang; Feibo Yu; Chulang Yu; Juan Chen; Ye Cheng; Chenqi Yan; Jianping Chen
Journal:  BMC Biotechnol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.563

10.  Use of Agrobacterium rhizogenes Strain 18r12v and Paromomycin Selection for Transformation of Brachypodium distachyon and Brachypodium sylvaticum.

Authors:  Ray Collier; Jennifer Bragg; Bryan T Hernandez; John P Vogel; Roger Thilmony
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.753

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.