Literature DB >> 17952492

Comparison of facial proportions and anthropometric norms among Turkish young adults with different face types.

Seher Gündüz Arslan1, Celal Genç, Bahadir Odabaş, Jalen Devecioğlu Kama.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of three different face types among Turkish young adults based on facial indices, to assess and compare the vertical and horizontal dimensions for each type, and to establish anthropometric norms for Turkish adults.
METHODS: A total of 173 healthy young adults (83 females and 90 males) 17 to 25 years of age were examined. Using anthropometric landmarks, 8 horizontal and 10 vertical direct measurements were made with a millimetric compass.
RESULTS: Using facial indices, 59 of the 173 subjects were classified as euryprosopic, 49 as mesoprosopic, and 65 as leptoproposic. In the total evaluation of both groups, all the parameters were higher in the males except forehead heights 1 and 2. A comparison of face types in females and males separately showed no significant differences between the parameters.
CONCLUSIONS: The data presented in this study may help plastic surgeons and orthodontists objectively determine the relationships between facial structures for different face types. Additionally, the facial anthropometric norms derived from this study may be useful in the treatment of Turkish patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17952492     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-007-9049-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  6 in total

1.  Nasofacial Anthropometric Study Among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran: A Population Based Study.

Authors:  Khojaste Rahimi Jaberi; Fatemeh Kavakebian; Sina Mojaverrostami; Amir Najibi; Manouchehr Safari; Gholamreza Hassanzadeh; Tahmineh Mokhtari
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2019-01-09

2.  Reliability of reference distances used in photogrammetry.

Authors:  Muge Aksu; Demet Kaya; Ilken Kocadereli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Applications of anthropometry in torsoplastic surgery.

Authors:  Fabio Fantozzi
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-05-30

4.  Automatic classification of human facial features based on their appearance.

Authors:  Felix Fuentes-Hurtado; Jose A Diego-Mas; Valery Naranjo; Mariano Alcañiz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Normative anthropometry and proportions of the Kenyan-African face and comparative anthropometry in relation to African Americans and North American Whites.

Authors:  Saurab S Virdi; David Wertheim; Farhad B Naini
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2019-02-22

6.  Facial Anthropometric Norms of the Young Iranian Population.

Authors:  Mohammad Bayat; Mahsa Shariati; Fatemeh Rajaeirad; Mir Saeed Yekaninejad; Fatemeh Momen-Heravi; Zeinab Davoudmanesh
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-05-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.