Literature DB >> 17952122

Breast cancer metastases are molecularly distinct from their primary tumors.

M Vecchi1, S Confalonieri, P Nuciforo, M A Viganò, M Capra, M Bianchi, D Nicosia, F Bianchi, V Galimberti, G Viale, G Palermo, A Riccardi, R Campanini, M G Daidone, M A Pierotti, S Pece, P P Di Fiore.   

Abstract

Metastases have been widely thought to arise from rare, selected, mutation-bearing cells in the primary tumor. Recently, however, it has been proposed that breast tumors are imprinted ab initio with metastatic ability. Thus, there is a debate over whether 'phenotypic' disease progression is really associated with 'molecular' progression. We profiled 26 matched primary breast tumors and lymph node metastases and identified 270 probesets that could discriminate between the two categories. We then used an independent cohort of breast tumors (81 samples) and unmatched distant metastases (32 samples) to validate and refine this list down to a 126-probeset list. A representative subset of these genes was subjected to analysis by in situ hybridization, on a third independent cohort (57 primary breast tumors and matched lymph node metastases). This not only confirmed the expression profile data, but also allowed us to establish the cellular origin of the signals. One-third of the analysed representative genes (4 of 11) were expressed by the epithelial component. The four epithelial genes alone were able to discriminate primary breast tumors from their metastases. Finally, engineered alterations in the expression of two of the epithelial genes (SERPINB5 and LTF) modified cell motility in vitro, in accordance with a possible causal role in metastasis. Our results show that breast cancer metastases are molecularly distinct from their primary tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17952122     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  49 in total

1.  Molecular Classification of Lymph Node Metastases Subtypes Predict for Survival in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Odile David; Robert J Cabay; Klara Valyi-Nagy; Virgilia Macias; Rong Zhong; Barry Wenig; Lawrence Feldman; Ralph Weichselbaum; Michael T Spiotto
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 2.  Matrix-metalloproteinases as targets for controlled delivery in cancer: An analysis of upregulation and expression.

Authors:  Kyle J Isaacson; M Martin Jensen; Nithya B Subrahmanyam; Hamidreza Ghandehari
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Heterogeneity of drug target expression among metastatic lesions: lessons from a breast cancer autopsy program.

Authors:  Patricia S Steeg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Genetic hallmarks of recurrent/metastatic adenoid cystic carcinoma.

Authors:  Allen S Ho; Angelica Ochoa; Gowtham Jayakumaran; Ahmet Zehir; Cristina Valero Mayor; Justin Tepe; Vladimir Makarov; Martin G Dalin; Jie He; Mark Bailey; Meagan Montesion; Jeffrey S Ross; Vincent A Miller; Lindsay Chan; Ian Ganly; Snjezana Dogan; Nora Katabi; Petros Tsipouras; Patrick Ha; Nishant Agrawal; David B Solit; P Andrew Futreal; Adel K El Naggar; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Britta Weigelt; Alan L Ho; Nikolaus Schultz; Timothy A Chan; Luc Gt Morris
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 5.  Eph-dependent cell-cell adhesion and segregation in development and cancer.

Authors:  Eva Nievergall; Martin Lackmann; Peter W Janes
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 9.261

6.  MGMT promoter methylation and immunoexpression in aggressive pituitary adenomas and carcinomas.

Authors:  Fateme Salehi; Bernd W Scheithauer; Johann M Kros; Queenie Lau; Michael Fealey; Dana Erickson; Kalman Kovacs; Eva Horvath; Ricardo V Lloyd
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Frequent genetic differences between matched primary and metastatic breast cancer provide an approach to identification of biomarkers for disease progression.

Authors:  Andrzej B Popławski; Michał Jankowski; Stephen W Erickson; Teresita Díaz de Ståhl; E Christopher Partridge; Chiquito Crasto; Jingyu Guo; John Gibson; Uwe Menzel; Carl Eg Bruder; Aneta Kaczmarczyk; Magdalena Benetkiewicz; Robin Andersson; Johanna Sandgren; Barbara Zegarska; Dariusz Bała; Ewa Srutek; David B Allison; Arkadiusz Piotrowski; Wojciech Zegarski; Jan P Dumanski
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  Tumor suppressor genes are frequently methylated in lymph node metastases of breast cancers.

Authors:  Weiwei Feng; Rosaria Orlandi; Naiqing Zhao; Maria Luisa Carcangiu; Elda Tagliabue; Jia Xu; Robert C Bast; Yinhua Yu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Change of HER2 status in metastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma: heterogeneity of the disease? Case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Jiaxin Niu; Jeffrey Weber; Deborah Gelbspan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2012-12

10.  Comparison of Predictive Immunohistochemical Marker Expression of Primary Breast Cancer and Paired Distant Metastasis using Surgical Material: A Practice-Based Study.

Authors:  Janina Kulka; Borbála Székely; Lilla V Lukács; Orsolya Kiss; Anna-Mária Tőkés; Eszter Vincze; Eszter Turányi; János Fillinger; Zoltán Hanzély; Gabriella Arató; Miklós Szendrői; Balázs Győrffy; A Marcell Szász
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.