Literature DB >> 1795167

Influence of stimulus repetition rate on cortical somatosensory potentials evoked by median nerve stimulation: implications for generation mechanisms.

J Huttunen1, V Hömberg.   

Abstract

Despite growing clinical and experimental interest in the cortical components of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) little is known about their physiological dynamics, e.g. with changing stimulation parameters. This paper reports the influence of varying stimulus repetition rate from 0.5 to 5 Hz on cortical SEPs up to 60-msec latency after right median nerve stimulation, separately analyzed at frontal (F3), central (C3) and parietal (P3) electrodes. The amplitudes of early frontal P20 and N25, central P14 and N18, and parietal N20 did not change with stimulation rate. Later deflections were significantly modified when their amplitudes were determined with respect to the baseline: at F3 negative N30 and N60 diminished and positive P40 was enhanced with increasing rate of stimulation. At P3 the effects were the reverse, so that positive P27 and P45 were attenuated while negative N34 and N60 were enhanced. At C3 both positive P22 and P40 and negative N60 were reduced. However, the corresponding peak-to-peak amplitudes changed much less. We conclude that SEP waveforms following the earliest cortical deflections are very sensitive to small changes in stimulation frequency. The opposite changes at F3 compared with P3 probably represent the opposite scalp field poles from horizontally oriented generator(s) located within the primary sensorimotor cortex (SMI). We suggest that the rate effects are partly due to selective sensitivity of postexcitatory inhibitory postsynaptic potentials to stimulation frequency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1795167     DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(91)90115-n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  6 in total

1.  Movement gating of beta/gamma oscillations involved in the N30 somatosensory evoked potential.

Authors:  Ana Maria Cebolla; Caty De Saedeleer; Ana Bengoetxea; Françoise Leurs; Costantino Balestra; Pablo d'Alcantara; Ernesto Palmero-Soler; Bernard Dan; Guy Cheron
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Cutaneous stimulation of the digits and lips evokes responses with different adaptation patterns in primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Mihai Popescu; Steven Barlow; Elena-Anda Popescu; Meredith E Estep; Lalit Venkatesan; Edward T Auer; William M Brooks
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-05-31       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Stimulus-rate sensitivity discerns area 3b of the human primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Yevhen Hlushchuk; Cristina Simões-Franklin; Cathy Nangini; Riitta Hari
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Development of Human Somatosensory Cortical Functions - What have We Learned from Magnetoencephalography: A Review.

Authors:  Päivi Nevalainen; Leena Lauronen; Elina Pihko
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Similarities and differences between on-scalp and conventional in-helmet magnetoencephalography recordings.

Authors:  Lau M Andersen; Robert Oostenveld; Christoph Pfeiffer; Silvia Ruffieux; Veikko Jousmäki; Matti Hämäläinen; Justin F Schneiderman; Daniel Lundqvist
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Evaluating age-related change in lip somatosensation using somatosensory evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Hiroki Hihara; Hiroyasu Kanetaka; Akitake Kanno; Satoko Koeda; Nobukazu Nakasato; Ryuta Kawashima; Keiichi Sasaki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.