Literature DB >> 17951427

Effects of perch diameter and incline on the kinematics, performance and modes of arboreal locomotion of corn snakes (Elaphe guttata).

Henry C Astley1, Bruce C Jayne.   

Abstract

Animals moving through arboreal habitats face several functional challenges, including fitting onto and moving on cylindrical branches with variable diameters and inclines. In contrast to lizards and primates, the arboreal locomotion of snakes is poorly understood, despite numerous snake species being arboreal. We quantified the kinematics and performance of corn snakes (Elaphe guttata) moving on seven cylinders (diameters 1.6-21 cm) with five inclines (horizontal, +/-45 degrees and +/-90 degrees) and through horizontal tunnels of corresponding widths. When perches were inclined at either 45 degrees or 90 degrees , snakes were unable to move uphill or downhill on the larger diameters. None of the locomotion on perches conformed to any previously described mode of limbless locomotion. On horizontal and uphill perches snakes performed a variant of concertina locomotion with periodic stopping and gripping. When moving downhill, snakes often slid continuously while grasping the perch to reduce their speed. Mean forward velocity decreased both with increased incline and with increased perch diameter, contrary to the beneficial effect of increased diameter on the speeds of lizards. Both tunnel width and perch diameter had widespread and similar effects on kinematics. When perches and tunnels were narrower, the snakes had more lateral bends at shallower angles. The numerous effects of perch diameter on kinematics and the similarity to tunnel concertina locomotion emphasize the importance of fit as a limitation in arboreal locomotion of snakes. However, the slower speeds on horizontal perches compared to tunnels also suggest that balance and grip may further limit locomotor performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17951427     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.009050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  7 in total

1.  Arboreal habitat structure affects route choice by rat snakes.

Authors:  Rachel H Mansfield; Bruce C Jayne
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Gripping during climbing of arboreal snakes may be safe but not economical.

Authors:  Greg Byrnes; Bruce C Jayne
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Geckos cling best to, and prefer to use, rough surfaces.

Authors:  Rishab Pillai; Eric Nordberg; Jendrian Riedel; Lin Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 3.172

4.  Turbulence-driven instabilities limit insect flight performance.

Authors:  Stacey A Combes; Robert Dudley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Jumping with adhesion: landing surface incline alters impact force and body kinematics in crested geckos.

Authors:  Timothy E Higham; Mara N S Hofmann; Michelle Modert; Marc Thielen; Thomas Speck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Getting It Straight: Accommodating Rectilinear Behavior in Captive Snakes-A Review of Recommendations and Their Evidence Base.

Authors:  Clifford Warwick; Rachel Grant; Catrina Steedman; Tiffani J Howell; Phillip C Arena; Angelo J L Lambiris; Ann-Elizabeth Nash; Mike Jessop; Anthony Pilny; Melissa Amarello; Steve Gorzula; Marisa Spain; Adrian Walton; Emma Nicholas; Karen Mancera; Martin Whitehead; Albert Martínez-Silvestre; Vanessa Cadenas; Alexandra Whittaker; Alix Wilson
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Generation of propulsive force via vertical undulations in snakes.

Authors:  Derek J Jurestovsky; Logan R Usher; Henry C Astley
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.312

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.