Literature DB >> 17951076

Variational Bayesian inversion of the equivalent current dipole model in EEG/MEG.

Stefan J Kiebel1, Jean Daunizeau, Christophe Phillips, Karl J Friston.   

Abstract

In magneto- and electroencephalography (M/EEG), spatial modelling of sensor data is necessary to make inferences about underlying brain activity. Most source reconstruction techniques belong to one of two approaches: point source models, which explain the data with a small number of equivalent current dipoles and distributed source or imaging models, which use thousands of dipoles. Much methodological research has been devoted to developing sophisticated Bayesian source imaging inversion schemes, while dipoles have received less such attention. Dipole models have their advantages; they are often appropriate summaries of evoked responses or helpful first approximations. Here, we propose a variational Bayesian algorithm that enables the fast Bayesian inversion of dipole models. The approach allows for specification of priors on all the model parameters. The posterior distributions can be used to form Bayesian confidence intervals for interesting parameters, like dipole locations. Furthermore, competing models (e.g., models with different numbers of dipoles) can be compared using their evidence or marginal likelihood. Using synthetic data, we found the scheme provides accurate dipole localizations. We illustrate the advantage of our Bayesian scheme, using a multi-subject EEG auditory study, where we compare competing models for the generation of the N100 component.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17951076     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  35 in total

1.  Temporal Information of Directed Causal Connectivity in Multi-Trial ERP Data using Partial Granger Causality.

Authors:  Vahab Youssofzadeh; Girijesh Prasad; Muhammad Naeem; KongFatt Wong-Lin
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2016-01

Review 2.  Dynamic causal modeling for EEG and MEG.

Authors:  Stefan J Kiebel; Marta I Garrido; Rosalyn Moran; Chun-Chuan Chen; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  The right hemisphere supports but does not replace left hemisphere auditory function in patients with persisting aphasia.

Authors:  Sundeep Teki; Gareth R Barnes; William D Penny; Paul Iverson; Zoe V J Woodhead; Timothy D Griffiths; Alexander P Leff
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Probabilistic algorithms for MEG/EEG source reconstruction using temporal basis functions learned from data.

Authors:  Johanna M Zumer; Hagai T Attias; Kensuke Sekihara; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Performance evaluation of the Champagne source reconstruction algorithm on simulated and real M/EEG data.

Authors:  Julia P Owen; David P Wipf; Hagai T Attias; Kensuke Sekihara; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem.

Authors:  Behtash Babadi; Gabriel Obregon-Henao; Camilo Lamus; Matti S Hämäläinen; Emery N Brown; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  A spatiotemporal dynamic distributed solution to the MEG inverse problem.

Authors:  Camilo Lamus; Matti S Hämäläinen; Simona Temereanca; Emery N Brown; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  "Change deafness" arising from inter-feature masking within a single auditory object.

Authors:  Nicolas Barascud; Timothy D Griffiths; David McAlpine; Maria Chait
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Subjective rating of weak tactile stimuli is parametrically encoded in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Ryszard Auksztulewicz; Felix Blankenburg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Ten simple rules for dynamic causal modeling.

Authors:  K E Stephan; W D Penny; R J Moran; H E M den Ouden; J Daunizeau; K J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.