Literature DB >> 17950721

Fine-grained sensitivity to statistical information in adult word learning.

Athena Vouloumanos1.   

Abstract

A language learner trying to acquire a new word must often sift through many potential relations between particular words and their possible meanings. In principle, statistical information about the distribution of those mappings could serve as one important source of data, but little is known about whether learners can in fact track multiple word-referent mappings, and, if they do, the precision with which they can represent those statistics. To test this, two experiments contrasted a pair of possibilities: that learners encode the fine-grained statistics of mappings in the input - both high- and low-frequency mappings - or, alternatively, that only high frequency mappings are represented. Participants were briefly trained on novel word-novel object pairs combined with varying frequencies: some objects were paired with one word, other objects with multiple words with differing frequencies (ranging from 10% to 80%). Results showed that participants were exquisitely sensitive to very small statistical differences in mappings. The second experiment showed that word learners' representation of low frequency mappings is modulated as a function of the variability in the environment. Implications for Mutual Exclusivity and Bayesian accounts of word learning are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17950721     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  21 in total

1.  Visual attention is not enough: Individual differences in statistical word-referent learning in infants.

Authors:  Linda B Smith; Chen Yu
Journal:  Lang Learn Dev       Date:  2013-01

2.  How words can and cannot be learned by observation.

Authors:  Tamara Nicol Medina; Jesse Snedeker; John C Trueswell; Lila R Gleitman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Statistical learning and language acquisition.

Authors:  Alexa R Romberg; Jenny R Saffran
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci       Date:  2010-11

4.  Propose but verify: fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  John C Trueswell; Tamara Nicol Medina; Alon Hafri; Lila R Gleitman
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2012-11-09       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Competition between multiple words for a referent in cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Viridiana L Benitez; Daniel Yurovsky; Linda B Smith
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  When experience meets language statistics: Individual variability in processing English compound words.

Authors:  Kaitlin Falkauskas; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Observational Word Learning: Beyond Propose-But-Verify and Associative Bean Counting.

Authors:  Tanja Roembke; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Pigeons acquire multiple categories in parallel via associative learning: a parallel to human word learning?

Authors:  Edward A Wasserman; Daniel I Brooks; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-12-08

Review 9.  The role of partial knowledge in statistical word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Damian C Fricker; Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-02

10.  Competitive processes in cross-situational word learning.

Authors:  Daniel Yurovsky; Chen Yu; Linda B Smith
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-04-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.